2.3L & 2.5L I4 Tech General discussion of 2.3L and 2.5L I4 Ford Ranger engines.

Guessing game

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-15-2004
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I just drove a 4 cylinder Ranger, but it didn't run on gasoline...
 
  #2  
Old 09-15-2004
Skyjacker_44's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hillsboro,Texas
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Guessing game

i'v heard a few people say this..i guess the rangers with the Leaf thing on the back on the tail gate... like where you would normally have a dealership badge?? means it can run on gas and some thing else?
 
  #3  
Old 09-15-2004
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That is the FFV, which can run on alcohol, but those are 6 cylinder engines.
 
  #4  
Old 09-15-2004
PickupMan92's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orange City, FL
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
pure hydrogen??????????????
 
  #5  
Old 09-15-2004
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Website re-naming and re-coding itself... Is it posessed??

Nope, not hydrogen.
 
  #6  
Old 09-15-2004
SilverTank's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you telling us you drove a diesel ranger?
 
  #7  
Old 09-15-2004
PickupMan92's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orange City, FL
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
how about just eletrcity?
 
  #8  
Old 09-15-2004
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SilverTank
Are you telling us you drove a diesel ranger?
We have a winner! Don, tell him what he's won...
 
  #9  
Old 09-15-2004
PickupMan92's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orange City, FL
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
oh geesh, sorry I still consider diesel a gas maybe cause it is........
 
  #10  
Old 09-15-2004
SilverTank's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, don't keep us in suspense. How's the thing drive?
Was it one of the 4 door diesels, or a regular Ranger with a diesel in it?
 
  #11  
Old 09-15-2004
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somewhere, XYZ
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He very clearly said it didn't run on gasoline, which diesel fuel is not.

That's freakin' cool. I assume it's a turbo injected engine. Any details? Whadjah think? How long do you estimate before it's available to us pleabs? Or is this another fleet only bit?
 
  #12  
Old 09-16-2004
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It was South American. I can't really talk about it much because I don't know what is prototype and what is already in production, but I will say I would probably buy one. The 4.0L is faster because the diesel needs boost to get out of its own way. Once it is on the boost though it moves just as fast as the 4.0L, the only thing I wish I knew is what the fuel economy is on the thing. If it was 20mpg I would say it isn't worth it, if it was 25mpg I would say it is.
 
  #13  
Old 09-16-2004
SilverTank's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hopefully, it's the Duratorq diesel that they introduced back in 02 for the Ford Transit (van).

The Argentinian Rangers use the older Power Stroke 2.8 made by International
http://www.international-engines.com...oma=2&Id=5
It's a great engine. The only specs I could find indicate a 10 Km/l mileage, which I guesstimate at around 22-23 mpg.


The Duratorq on the the other hand, kicks butt in terms of mileage.
taken from this article: http://www.automotivetimes.com/pr/ford93002.html


Ford has now introduced a Duratorq TDCi 2.0-litre turbodiesel engine into the diverse Transit powertrain range. The 125 PS (123 bhp/93 kW) engine offers commercial vehicle customers increased torque, higher power, greater refinement and lower fuel consumption - the multiple benefits of high-pressure common-rail technology.

The new Duratorq TDCi 2.0-litre engine delivers peak torque of 285 Nm (208 lb ft). Its variable nozzle turbocharger provides robust low- and mid-range torque levels that give the new Transit TDCi excellent responsiveness and in-gear acceleration. Its pulling power is calibrated especially for the needs of Transit commercial vans and chassis-cabs as well as drivers of the new Ford Tourneo minibus.

Its fuel economy is impressive. According to homologation data for 1,700-kilogram inertia weight class models, Transit TDCi fuel consumption levels are certified, in litres per 100 kilometres, at 8.8 (32 mpg) urban, 6.2 (45.5 mpg) extra urban and 7.2 (39 mpg) combined in the new European driving cycle. This gives Transit TDCi models in this class an effective range of 1,100 kilometres (680 miles) between fill-ups of its standard, 80-litre fuel tank.
 
  #14  
Old 09-16-2004
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That is not the engine they use in south america, they use a 2.5 liter, and more recently the 2.8 powerstroke.
 
  #15  
Old 09-16-2004
SilverTank's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave and Julie
That is not the engine they use in south america, they use a 2.5 liter, and more recently the 2.8 powerstroke.
Yup, I just finished editing my first post. The 2.8 is a great engine, but the mileage is probably low. The trade off is tons of torque, and it's supposedly a very quiet engine with low vibration.
Was it the 2.8 in the one you drove?
 
  #16  
Old 04-19-2005
Codizzle's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Eatonville, Wa
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
could it have run on propane?
 
  #17  
Old 04-19-2005
Mudhippy's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
whoa, whe did they come back....its been awhile
 
  #18  
Old 04-19-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Exit 105 New Jersey
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yo McFly - check the original post date back in September 2004
 
  #19  
Old 04-19-2005
rngprerunner's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
It's He, julie doesnt post.. and check the date

Edit:: Neil beat me to it.. ha
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rngprerunner
General Technical & Electrical
13
06-07-2018 07:12 PM
FMD
General Ford Ranger Discussion
4
12-07-2006 10:59 AM



Quick Reply: Guessing game



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 PM.