2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

CATs

  #1  
Old 10-24-2004
BigRed01's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Perry County, Ohio
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
alrighty, ive got a question, i jsut took my flowmaster off my 01 ranger, and put straight pipe on it, and its is NOT much louder than it was with the flowmaster on it. Would it hurt anything to remove the catalytic converters? just wondering it if would hurt anything.

thanks
BigRed01
 
  #2  
Old 10-24-2004
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
If you have emission inspection in your area, it will, lol. You would have to take ALL 5 CATS off to really make a difference. The 3.0 Ranger uses a multi-stage cat system for efficiency and minimum backpressure. There are 2 "preheat" cats on each branch of the Y-pipe that do some conversion and keep the exhaust gas hot before the main cat. 2+2+1=5 cats.

In '01, you have a catalyst efficiency monitor that reads the oxygen both pre-cat and after the cat and determines if they are working properly. If you remove the cat/cats you will have a constant check engine light.

It's illegal under federal law and I believe most state laws to alter the emission system by removing the cats. If you don't have state emission inspections then you may never be caught -- but it's something to think about.

But it doesn't hurt anything but the air we breath -- which isn't a great idea. You'll find some people on the boards who will tear you a new you-know-what for taking your cats off, lol.

Overall, I'd say don't do it unless your truck spends most of it's life offroad or racing.
 
  #3  
Old 10-24-2004
PickupMan92's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orange City, FL
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The less backpressure you have the less toruqe and I know from driving other's 3.0, there isn't a whole lotta torque to begin with.

IMO I'd jsut put the flow back on or maybe get a dual flow with long 18" 3" wide tips. If it's the sound you are going for, that's your best bet.
 
  #4  
Old 10-24-2004
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
True! The sound quality with the dual pipes is VERY deep and rumbly even on a 3.0. Some guys around here have done that.

But LOUD it is not.
 
  #5  
Old 10-25-2004
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You'll get very familiar with your check engine light. The fine for doing so is also very heav. You'll gain absolutely nothing, in fact you'll lose performance. Oddly enough, the vehicle was designed to run with the cats.
 
  #6  
Old 10-25-2004
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Absolutely. Dave, did you read my post about IAT and the FFV? Can you find anything out for me?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jaycheetwood
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
14
10-03-2008 08:54 PM
00 Ranger
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
21
05-16-2008 05:06 PM
TXranger4x4
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
10
07-11-2006 12:34 AM
Rangerboy03lvl2
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
18
08-27-2005 11:37 AM
jerrod07
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
19
08-25-2005 10:29 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: CATs



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:03 AM.