Squires Turbo 4.0 (250-313 rwhp)
#1
Squires Turbo 4.0 (250-313 rwhp)
I did some searches and didnt see anything revelant. It might be a repost though. Anyways, they make 2 different turbos for the 4.0 and they make some awesome rwhp.
heres the link
http://www.ststurbo.com/mustang_v6
most of their set up likes this are right around $5000...which is about right and not too shabby
heres the link
http://www.ststurbo.com/mustang_v6
most of their set up likes this are right around $5000...which is about right and not too shabby
#3
#8
#10
Unregistered User
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by optikal illushun
thats only like 380 at the crank. stock is 205, sure its a decent jump but for 5 grand? thats 13.4ish per hp...not very cost effective.
Lotsa change to buy the boys some beer too!
#12
Also worth noting.. power comes at a price. Pushing a *stock 4.0L* to nearly double it's stock power output is going to take a toll. If it lives.. it's life will not be too long. A built 4.0L motor or a V8 can make the same power and do it for years.
Gotta pay to play.
If you really want to make cheap power and have it last? ***Ramp up** nitrous to more than a 50shot.
Rich
Gotta pay to play.
If you really want to make cheap power and have it last? ***Ramp up** nitrous to more than a 50shot.
Rich
#16
Unregistered User
Posts: n/a
I thought I was smart. Yeah.. I'll try a M90 supercharger.. Wound up giving it away for nothing to ScottyG or Gerry or someone.. Wasn't all I thought it would be. I tried a procharger PS1C.. Same results.. Still didn't have the 'umph' I wanted.. Juice? Yeah, all flavors and variations..
Having 2 less cylinders is like going to a stag party without your pair of ' boys ', your driving an impotent Eunuch.
Theres NO replacement for displacement, I wasted over 5 grand remembering such.
Having 2 less cylinders is like going to a stag party without your pair of ' boys ', your driving an impotent Eunuch.
Theres NO replacement for displacement, I wasted over 5 grand remembering such.
#17
Originally Posted by D.
I thought I was smart. Yeah.. I'll try a M90 supercharger.. Wound up giving it away for nothing to ScottyG or Gerry or someone.. Wasn't all I thought it would be. I tried a procharger PS1C.. Same results.. Still didn't have the 'umph' I wanted.. Juice? Yeah, all flavors and variations..
Having 2 less cylinders is like going to a stag party without your pair of ' boys ', your driving an impotent Eunuch.
Theres NO replacement for displacement, I wasted over 5 grand remembering such.
Having 2 less cylinders is like going to a stag party without your pair of ' boys ', your driving an impotent Eunuch.
Theres NO replacement for displacement, I wasted over 5 grand remembering such.
C'mon now D!
#18
The stock bottom ends can take atleast 350 whp. Our Cologne engines have hypereutectic pistons (meh) but we do have forged rods. I used to have a 4.0 Mustang, the ideal turbo for the 4.0 is the Powerhouse turbo.
http://www.powerhouse411.com/
It's made up 450 whp on 4.0 Mustangs, with stock motors.
http://www.powerhouse411.com/
It's made up 450 whp on 4.0 Mustangs, with stock motors.
#21
#22
#23
Unregistered User
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by NicksterSVT
C'mon now D!
I don't mean to be a hater, but these ' 6-packs ' aren't like that KEG of 302. They only go so far..
A slightly modified ( heads/cam/intake/exhaust/bolt-on whatever ) 302 will THUMP our 6-packs. I've tried, even on the happyness of laughing gas, its tough.
They start pulling and its over.
#24
Unregistered User
Posts: n/a
#25
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eBay / Craigslist Find: UWS Black Low-Pro toolbox $250 kernerville NC $250
dixie_boysles
eBay & Craigslist Finds
5
10-28-2010 02:19 PM
Ranger1
General Ford Ranger Discussion
18
05-02-2005 10:35 AM