Humanly Possible?
#26
Originally Posted by rngprerunner
Race the 6-Speed, I think even you would get it handed to ya, they are a very quick car, if the driver is any good that is, the clutch in those things are alittle touchy...
All i know is that i handed the *** to my friend in his.. I know someone with a stick... I will get it o n video.. I dont agree with me getting it handed to me..
Yes, he might beat me, but not as bad as you think...
#27
Originally Posted by FoMoCoEdge
All i know is that i handed the *** to my friend in his.. I know someone with a stick... I will get it o n video.. I dont agree with me getting it handed to me..
Yes, he might beat me, but not as bad as you think...
Yes, he might beat me, but not as bad as you think...
#30
The 6 speed RX8 is less than impressive. I drove one a while back and found it to be gutless and less than thrilling to drive. The torque is WEEEAAAAK and the gears feel too long for a motor with such little torque numbers. The FC/FD RX-7s were awesome performance wise, and easily enhanced but I think they ran into some durability issues as well as emissions problems with the old 13b motor...
#33
the Mazda 13B twin rotor engine is being tested in marine applications
the 175c delivers 175 horsepower, weighs only 315 pounds and fits within the space of a 2 foot cube
the RPMC 240Si fits in the same tiny space, but delivers 240 hp weight 350 pounds and is supercharged
boats like high revving motors
just an engagement clutch is required as the water provides enough slip to prevent stalling
the 175c delivers 175 horsepower, weighs only 315 pounds and fits within the space of a 2 foot cube
the RPMC 240Si fits in the same tiny space, but delivers 240 hp weight 350 pounds and is supercharged
boats like high revving motors
just an engagement clutch is required as the water provides enough slip to prevent stalling
#35
OK - so I go from U boat commander to Capt Stubing?
actually when the Crusaders go on my Bertram rotary power is in consideration
the boat posted is a 26' Bertram but with stern drive
I have twin inboards (V6 262 cu in) and the change in weight will be amazing
although a modern engine of the same size and type that I currenlty have now puts out 220 HP against my 22 year old babies at only 165 HP
plus would be 2/3 the cost of those Madza power plants
actually when the Crusaders go on my Bertram rotary power is in consideration
the boat posted is a 26' Bertram but with stern drive
I have twin inboards (V6 262 cu in) and the change in weight will be amazing
although a modern engine of the same size and type that I currenlty have now puts out 220 HP against my 22 year old babies at only 165 HP
plus would be 2/3 the cost of those Madza power plants
#38
#39
I knew a guy at my first co-op that drove an RX-7 twin-turbo. That thing was quite nice in every respect.. but nearly always broken. He constantly had turbo problems! And at his age (early 20's, first real-job) it was tuff for him to maintain it. I think ALL of his income went into that thing..
#40
Originally Posted by sawred
The rotary in the RX-8 is a high reving low torque sports car engine!
Performance
Base Engine Size: 1.3 liters Base Engine Type: Rotary
Horsepower: 238 hp Max Horsepower: 8500 rpm
Torque: 159 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 5500 rpm
Performance
Base Engine Size: 1.3 liters Base Engine Type: Rotary
Horsepower: 238 hp Max Horsepower: 8500 rpm
Torque: 159 ft-lbs. Max Torque: 5500 rpm
#42
well the chevy block Crusaders in my boat have been running since 1984
low hours on them (1275) but they were not treated well before I got my hands on them
no smoke (well sort of hard to tell with a water cooled exhaust) and one one has burned just a little oil
on the trip to the haul out this year one engine was tapping a bit
hydraulic lifters could be the culprit, or I might need a valve adjustment
those little rotary engines are mainly a pipe dream on my part
same as some small volvo or yanmar diesels
I just don't burn enough fuel to make up the huge price difference to justify a diesel conversion
probably will put in some modern gas V6 engines when the time comes
I might consider small V8s as they may actually use less fuel for my purpose
last boat had a single 454 big block (7.4 liter mercruiser) and it actually got decent fuel economy, till those secondaries kicked in.....
low hours on them (1275) but they were not treated well before I got my hands on them
no smoke (well sort of hard to tell with a water cooled exhaust) and one one has burned just a little oil
on the trip to the haul out this year one engine was tapping a bit
hydraulic lifters could be the culprit, or I might need a valve adjustment
those little rotary engines are mainly a pipe dream on my part
same as some small volvo or yanmar diesels
I just don't burn enough fuel to make up the huge price difference to justify a diesel conversion
probably will put in some modern gas V6 engines when the time comes
I might consider small V8s as they may actually use less fuel for my purpose
last boat had a single 454 big block (7.4 liter mercruiser) and it actually got decent fuel economy, till those secondaries kicked in.....
#43
I know where there is a 560 cubic inch ford v8 that is sitting....just needs oil and tranny lol
It all depends on what you wanna do with it. It would take some lightening and some serious gear work, but hey anything is possible if you have the time and money to do it. I am still tossing the possibility around of yanking the SOHC out of my truck when I get it paid for and putting a 7.3 powerstroke in it...I get em cheap through work lol
It all depends on what you wanna do with it. It would take some lightening and some serious gear work, but hey anything is possible if you have the time and money to do it. I am still tossing the possibility around of yanking the SOHC out of my truck when I get it paid for and putting a 7.3 powerstroke in it...I get em cheap through work lol
#46
Really...well, spalusa got a 6.0 to fit and the dimensions of the block are relatively close. Now, I didn't say that it was going to drop in. I would be moving the firewall back, ditching the inner fenders, and adding an engine cover in the cab. I have done the measurements...I work for Navistar/International and have been playing around with the idea for a while...
#47
Have you all even seen the 07-08 mazda RX-7? The engine will be lighter than 1.3L and they are goign to be mainly attacking the torque problem, the frame will be based off the RX-8 but will be shorter, they will bring back the two seater and two doors, the car will also have better aerodynamics than the older RX-7 and RX-8, Mazda aslo hopes to plan on dropping the same engine into a re-worked miata, also based off the RX-8 platform, but shorter as well. they say the Miata will be made for those who want the performance of an RX-7 but dont want to pay the 30k-35k price of the RX-7 i will try to find some pics of both the Miata and the RX-7.
#48