An evil Idea...
#28
Yes I know (L.O.L). This is a good truck as it is but I feel that something is missing from it power wise. I usually run with the tailgate down but I closed it for the purpose of the photo. it looks good don't it.
#31
Hahahaha! "800whp straight motor" lol how will this be accomplished with a stroked low comp 302? jw, not saying you wont have a ridiculous "track" terror with v8s and turbos and headers en such, just sounds like a bit of a wast for a ford ranger why not just buy a second car that's already turbo, and save your truck for moving furniture and piles of rocks?
#32
Update....
Hahahaha! "800whp straight motor" lol how will this be accomplished with a stroked low comp 302? jw, not saying you wont have a ridiculous "track" terror with v8s and turbos and headers en such, just sounds like a bit of a wast for a ford ranger why not just buy a second car that's already turbo, and save your truck for moving furniture and piles of rocks?
#33
I'll post one for you this weekend after I finish detailing it. I wanted to do it today but from where I had to work this past friday and due to the weather, I was too tired and I slept too late as well.
#34
Hahahaha! "800whp straight motor" lol how will this be accomplished with a stroked low comp 302? jw, not saying you wont have a ridiculous "track" terror with v8s and turbos and headers en such, just sounds like a bit of a wast for a ford ranger why not just buy a second car that's already turbo, and save your truck for moving furniture and piles of rocks?
#35
#36
OMG Dear jesus...
Well I went on www.jegs.com to see what they had in terms of Fuel Injection systems and carbs. THEY'VE FINALLY DONE IT. They now have a Carb that can and has been used in turbocharging. It's called the Mighty Demon "Blow Through" Carb with Downleg boosters. It's rated at 850 cfms and they even have the fuel pump that goes with it. What took them so long, we'll never know but A Carb that can handle up to about 50 lbs of boost is amazing. usually the best kind if carb that was used in Forced Induction systems was for a supercharger and can handle up to about 15 lbs of boost (the most that I've seen out of a supercharger). But now they've opened the door for more younger people to learn more about carbs. Fuel Injection is best for economy purposes. Racing systems that use this usually LOSE POWER ON THE TOP END. Even with meaner injectors that really doesn't help much without additional components. The Carbs however usually gains power on the top end of the RPM range. Engine Masters magazine even did an article about this. There's also been too many dyno sheets that have stated the same thing as well. I aint Knocking Fuel Injection now because there are some F.I. systems that can do extremely well in High RPM situations. I've decided to find either an 80's model ranger or an early 90's model Mazda B2000 4 banger donor truck to begin as soon as I can get every thing I need. That carb versus Fuel Injection, i'll take the carb.
#37
"Oh, I forgot to mention this earlier. 9.5:1 is NOT A LOW COMPRESSION RATIO. That means with this CR i'll have to use the supreme unleaded. The new Supercharged Shelby Mustangs have to run supreme unleaded fuel and they run the same cr."
#38
WTF? dude your posts ramble sooooo bad! I did not mention fuel grades, and almost any aftermarket boost application will need a higher octane, besides this i would say 9.5:1 is low comp, and why are you dropping engine displacement hp quotes? A Toyota supra 2jz turbo 3.0 motor can make 1300hp I would love to see a ford ranger sohc 4.0 v6 make comparable power, nuff said. I just think this is a bit ambishious for what will really become reality.
Last edited by knightmare1015; 04-20-2008 at 03:29 AM.
#39
#41
#43
If I'm not mistaken stock 302 blocks aren't good for much over 450-500hp with any longevity. The blocks flex too much. If you plan on a bottom end girdle etc I imagine you could go farther. The 302 Boss blocks built in 1969-1970 were strong but are rare of course.
The blocks used in NASCAR are based on the 351 Windsor with 351 Cleveland journal sizes. The heads used in NASCAR are 351C "canted valve" derivitives also.
The blocks used in NASCAR are based on the 351 Windsor with 351 Cleveland journal sizes. The heads used in NASCAR are 351C "canted valve" derivitives also.
#44
An Update....
Well so much for any further updates at this point. This will be the last one posted. I was really wanting to use low CR but that won't be the case. I'm told i'll have around 10.5:1 CR with 72 CC's. The engine builder I'm using said that it. He's wanting me to higher on the CC's but I'm comfortable with 72 CC's. the block will be from DSS Racing. they're trying to get me to buy a "turnkey or Crate engine" but that's too easy.
#45
Who's B.S.ing? And for your information they'll know by the engine code and when I retitle it which I have to do unfortunately. I thought that was the Stock CR dude. I was mistaken about that. But no big deal. You shouldn't put someone down like that dude. That was wrong.
#46
If I'm not mistaken stock 302 blocks aren't good for much over 450-500hp with any longevity. The blocks flex too much. If you plan on a bottom end girdle etc I imagine you could go farther. The 302 Boss blocks built in 1969-1970 were strong but are rare of course.
The blocks used in NASCAR are based on the 351 Windsor with 351 Cleveland journal sizes. The heads used in NASCAR are 351C "canted valve" derivitives also.
The blocks used in NASCAR are based on the 351 Windsor with 351 Cleveland journal sizes. The heads used in NASCAR are 351C "canted valve" derivitives also.
#47
Yes and no. The donor vehicle serves 2 purposes in the Hotrod world. The first is what you just mentioned. The 2nd is for complete restoration which could cost pretty much the bank. Alot of Hotrod shods don't usually start from scratch anymore, in fact they'd rather do a resto project with a rolling chassis than build from scratch (Frame and all).
#48
Well to be honest I haven't either, but alot of these high performance engine companies are starting to do that from where they partner up with camshaft companies to increase their revenues and to offer a "more complete kit" than their competiton. Nelson Racing engines gives you a set of turbos (45 MM), pistons, rods, camshafts, and crankshaft to go with the kit.
#49
Who's B.S.ing? And for your information they'll know by the engine code and when I retitle it which I have to do unfortunately. I thought that was the Stock CR dude. I was mistaken about that. But no big deal. You shouldn't put someone down like that dude. That was wrong.
#50
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mistaking a 6.8:5 Compression Ratio??? Do you know anything about engines?1.36:1 for CR, huh? I'm not putting you down. I'm telling you to cut the crap. The engine code won't tell anyone about a stroker motor either. It will tell them the original size, that's it. You don't have to retitle it either. I just read all the VA laws on this stuff...