Ford Snapshots & Videos Share Ford photos and videos not related to the Ford Ranger in this sub-forum.

My 1994 F-150

  #1  
Old 02-13-2011
04XLTFX4's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Huntingdon,Pa
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 1994 F-150

My F-150 since 1997. Did have a 4in suspention lift and 33s when I got it. I tow alot with it so I went back to stock added overload springs and 4.10s went down to 31s. By 2001 it rusted out I put on Ford bedsides, cab corners, and front fenders, both gas tanks, sandblasted the frame, added a Cervini 4 inch hood, and it hasnt been in salt since and is garaged all the time now. It has 127,000 on it and doesnt burn any oil yet, when it does it will be stroked for a little more torque.
 
Attached Thumbnails My 1994 F-150-resized-f-150.jpg  
  #2  
Old 02-14-2011
rolsmojave3's Avatar
Level III Supporter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looks nice, what does it have for engine.
 
  #3  
Old 02-14-2011
FULLSCALE's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Clinton, Ontario
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Nice looking truck, my favourite body style!
 
  #4  
Old 02-14-2011
04XLTFX4's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Huntingdon,Pa
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rolsmojave3
Looks nice, what does it have for engine.
Thanks is a 351. With the gears itll hang with my dads v10 to almost 80 empty drag race,and will beat his mileage by 1 usually. We travel to Deere shows some and tow similar weight. Thats his Super Duty behind my truck.
 
  #5  
Old 02-14-2011
powerranger262's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hartford, WI
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That looks real nice, makes me miss mine a little.
 
  #6  
Old 02-14-2011
rolsmojave3's Avatar
Level III Supporter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've considered those trucks with the 351, the 302's seem gutless in anything more then a reg cab
 
  #7  
Old 02-14-2011
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Love the body style. We use to have a 94 regcab with the flareside bed with dual tanks. Was lowered just a little and had the 5.0 in it.
 
  #8  
Old 02-14-2011
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rolsmojave3
I've considered those trucks with the 351, the 302's seem gutless in anything more then a reg cab
Avoid the 5.0 period we use to have one in a regcab it was weak on power. They are only rated at 170hp back then.
 
  #9  
Old 02-14-2011
04XLTFX4's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Huntingdon,Pa
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonic04Edge
Avoid the 5.0 period we use to have one in a regcab it was weak on power. They are only rated at 170hp back then.
Some of the lack performance of the body style is the way Ford geared most of them 3.55 was all the gear you could get. With the 302 and no real gears overdrive was almost useless in extended cabs. Chevy was running mostly 3.73 back then and they had a little advanage esp after they finally figured out what multiport fuel injection was.
 
  #10  
Old 02-14-2011
rolsmojave3's Avatar
Level III Supporter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A guy I worked for had an ext cab long box with the 302 and 4:10 gears....it was still gutless.
 
  #11  
Old 02-14-2011
Pless215's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dewy Rose, GA
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We had a reg cab long bed 2wd with the posi-trac 3.55s. Once we had to replace the motor, that thing was quite powerful especially for a longbed.
 
  #12  
Old 02-15-2011
powerranger262's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hartford, WI
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The 5.8L in mine moved the big lead sled around just fine, but hurt at the pumps quite a bit.
 
  #13  
Old 02-15-2011
sniper_101's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sask, Canada
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Awesome looking truck, just awesome! Love OBS Fords!

I'd have a 408W or 460 with a 4-spd & D60 in that sucker if I were made of money!
 
  #14  
Old 02-15-2011
04XLTFX4's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Huntingdon,Pa
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by powerranger262
The 5.8L in mine moved the big lead sled around just fine, but hurt at the pumps quite a bit.
I dont think mine is as hard on gas loaded as the Ranger is. I went to Iowa once and brought back a 66 Mustang and 2 Jd lawn and gardens tractors. Got 14.1 and a 14.2 going out emtoy car trailer and got a 13.1 and a 12.5 coming back. I was really happy with that esp the 13.1 out of Iowa across ILL and Indiana. Cruise set at 68, Air on.
 
  #15  
Old 02-15-2011
powerranger262's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hartford, WI
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That's not bad at all.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MXLuver
General Technical & Electrical
10
04-14-2011 04:11 PM
duffman84
General Ford Ranger Discussion
5
10-14-2008 11:42 AM
Pepi
General Ford Ranger Discussion
12
10-19-2006 06:36 AM
HAZZARDJOHN
New Ideas
11
08-18-2006 11:16 AM
rbmc1968
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
11
07-13-2006 09:17 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: My 1994 F-150



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 AM.