General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Catalytic Converter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-21-2008
JKFTerry's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Grovetown, GA
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Catalytic Converter

Hi Everybody. I have a 94 Ranger Supercab 4.0 w/199,900K & I need info on removing cats & installing straight pipe. We don't have vechicle inspections in the state of Ga., and this is something I was just toying with. Since both O2
sensors are before the cats I was wondering about the effects on driveability & performance! Any input would be appreciated!
Thanks,
J.Terry
 
  #2  
Old 03-21-2008
Downey's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Muncy, PA
Posts: 8,470
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
i have the ?? free bump
 
  #3  
Old 03-21-2008
elementsenjoi's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 352 Florida
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
it won't affect drivability, performance may be a little better, and it will be louder w/o the cats. if the sensors are before the cats it shouldn't throw a code and turn the c/e light on.
 
  #4  
Old 03-21-2008
5speedin2.3's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Livonia, Mi
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or you could just buy an aftermarket cat to replace yours.
 
  #5  
Old 03-21-2008
Roach2004's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Performance will be better. Just throw a pipe in there!
 
  #6  
Old 03-22-2008
Oasis's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Orrrrr you could just keep your cat(s) and do the environment a favor.

I guess it's "anything goes" for some people though.

http://www.epa.gov/OMS/regs/im/960092.pdf
 
  #7  
Old 03-22-2008
5speedin2.3's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Livonia, Mi
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you ever get caught you will get a HUGE ticket/fine.

have fun.
 
  #8  
Old 03-22-2008
Machine090767's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 6,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 5speedin2.3
if you ever get caught you will get a HUGE ticket/fine.

have fun.
Here in MN, "tampering with or removing any Emissions control devise (s)from a vehicle will result in a $500 fine."
 
  #10  
Old 03-22-2008
Mr. Special's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Oasis
Orrrrr you could just keep your cat(s) and do the environment a favor.

I guess it's "anything goes" for some people though.

http://www.epa.gov/OMS/regs/im/960092.pdf

haha so the fact that ive spent the last few days gradually installing a full race header on a 06 rsx-s makes me a bad person.... welp the end result in performance and sound is a perfectly justifyable offset for me!


id ditch mine in a second if i had anyhting but this 3.0
 
  #11  
Old 03-22-2008
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Why make pollution when it's not necessary? You all are just too cheap to do it right and get performance WITH a CAT -- and it can be done.

So yes, you're an uncaring person who takes the easy way out. No respect for that.

If the vehicle is race only, who cares? But it's wrong to do it to a daily driver. Period.
 
  #12  
Old 03-22-2008
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
I took the cat off of my car and it made a TREMENDOUS difference. Not only did it sound much louder at high RPM (pretty much the same at low RPM) it gave me atleast 25 HP at the tire. I had the car dyno'ed after I did this and a few other mods and I had increased 37HP so I don't know how much of this 37 came from having the cat off but I am guessing about 25. As for emissions testing, you can use spark-plug defoulers to pull the sensor out of the flow so that the sensors will not tell the computer that the cat is missing, this is what I did and it works perfect. I can pass emissions no problems.
 
  #13  
Old 03-22-2008
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Right, Mr. Turbo. 25 HP from the CAT -- which vehicle by the way? And I don't believe you can pass emissions. I think you're full of...stuff.

(another one heard from...)
 
  #14  
Old 03-23-2008
JKFTerry's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Grovetown, GA
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all input, negative as well as positive! Just an idea I was toying with. I made up my mind to go with a high performance cat. Any suggestions on said part?
Thanks,
J.Terry


He Who Knows EveryThing - Don't Know Squat!!!
 
  #15  
Old 03-23-2008
Mr. Special's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by n3elz
Right, Mr. Turbo. 25 HP from the CAT -- which vehicle by the way? And I don't believe you can pass emissions. I think you're full of...stuff.

(another one heard from...)
id assume his Evo. as for the defouler, that should only prevent the computer from throwing a cel...

and honostly, (tho not as much on our trucks) getting 10-30+ wheel hp on a single mod to a performance vehicle costing under $600 ($190 in my case) is one of the best cost to gain you an get
 
  #16  
Old 03-27-2008
Oasis's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by n3elz
Why make pollution when it's not necessary? You all are just too cheap to do it right and get performance WITH a CAT -- and it can be done.

So yes, you're an uncaring person who takes the easy way out. No respect for that.

If the vehicle is race only, who cares? But it's wrong to do it to a daily driver. Period.
THANK YOU!


You're a homo Sean... and your Ranger sucks.


j/k...


... about the Ranger


... you're still a homo.
 
  #17  
Old 03-27-2008
RangerExtreme's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Robinson, Pa
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by n3elz
Right, Mr. Turbo. 25 HP from the CAT -- which vehicle by the way? And I don't believe you can pass emissions. I think you're full of...stuff.

(another one heard from...)
Thats cause he is bsing....not if u gte the probe in the exhaust...and even before that it fails the visual...sooo i guess that wouldn't work out would it.
 
  #18  
Old 03-27-2008
5speedin2.3's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Livonia, Mi
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you guys do know that some states don't have inspections right..?

theres still no reason to remove the cats unless they are plugged/broken.
i can see cutting the cats off an offroad only vehicle(IE: race car or trail beater), but thats a different story.
 
  #19  
Old 03-27-2008
Downey's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Muncy, PA
Posts: 8,470
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Jp7
I took the cat off of my car and it made a TREMENDOUS difference. Not only did it sound much louder at high RPM (pretty much the same at low RPM) it gave me atleast 25 HP at the tire. I had the car dyno'ed after I did this and a few other mods and I had increased 37HP so I don't know how much of this 37 came from having the cat off but I am guessing about 25. As for emissions testing, you can use spark-plug defoulers to pull the sensor out of the flow so that the sensors will not tell the computer that the cat is missing, this is what I did and it works perfect. I can pass emissions no problems.
if he did this to his evo i can see maybe 15 hp because your making the exhuast flow better which in turn helps the turbo but i cant see 25. but who knows i only have one cat on my 94 4.0 and i don't have a muffler i love the sound of it if your going for sound just punch out the second cat there is no need for 2 cats its b.s and you will gain some performance out of it. i noticed a little better and a little better gas milage too so w.e its up to you.
 
  #20  
Old 03-31-2008
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
I did the downpipe from the turbo back and the testpipe at the same time. And yes the defouler trick works perfect. I have been running the car this way for nearly 4000 miles with no Check engine light (no codes, so the car will pass) 37 horsepower at the tire was the measured improvement from these mods (downpipe and testpipe)
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Johnny Mac
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
12
10-22-2008 10:22 PM
Jp7
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
15
11-30-2007 09:54 AM
zabeard
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
31
07-18-2007 04:05 AM
FORZDA
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
18
07-05-2007 10:08 PM
seneca
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
14
01-31-2006 07:57 PM



Quick Reply: Catalytic Converter



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 PM.