General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Scan Gauge or X Cal - Next Mod?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-31-2008
FullThrottle02's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: McHenry,IL
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Icon5 Scan Gauge or X Cal - Next Mod?

I have heard such good things from both, but with fuel economy being important it seems like the Scan Gauge would be the thing to get. So what would you get?
 
  #2  
Old 07-31-2008
Goodysgotacuda's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Not really impressed with my bang for buck on my xcal. Yea its a little better all around, shifts are a little firmer..maybe a mpg or two at speed. Just my 2cents, basically stock 3.0. If i had a chance to try it out or something first, i would have put $380 in my truck elsewhere, like some spindles. Just my opinion though!
 
  #3  
Old 07-31-2008
FullThrottle02's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: McHenry,IL
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do have a 4.0 and I have: headers, cat-back, cold air, udp's, plug wires, e-fan, and synthetic fluids. So it might benefit me, but I like the fact that I could fine tune my driving style to get better fuel economy. Also I wouldn't have to install after market gauges, as it is all in one.I usually drive about 5 mph over the speed limit, but I get there as fast as I can. I have a heavy lead foot. I don't know, I just need some opinions.
 
  #4  
Old 07-31-2008
Blackhawk's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think with all those other engine mods, you probably would be better off get the X-cal II.
 
  #5  
Old 07-31-2008
leadfoot's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So an X-cal is not worth it on a stock truck?
 
  #6  
Old 07-31-2008
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boring, Oregon
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
TUNER!!! The tuner will much better group those mods together...tweak the curves a bit better. Tuner is my vote.


EFF it.....whats another 140 for the scangauge? Get both!
 
  #7  
Old 07-31-2008
Goodysgotacuda's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by leadfoot
So an X-cal is not worth it on a stock truck?
I think i would have been happier spending the money on a rebuilt limited slip, underdrive pulley, flowmaster, and have some change. May be different on a 4.0. I expected more out of the shifting and a little more torque. My m/ts are pretty sticky tires, but in a coat of rain and with 4.10s i can't hardly spin the tires by loadin the brakes all the way up and holding it to the floor. Won't hardly powerbrake in the dirt either. Wasn't expecting miracles...but more than it gave. Probably helps more on a more modded engine i'd imagine.
 
  #8  
Old 07-31-2008
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why don't you get the livewire 3? Isn't it a tuner and "gauge" in one??

It should be on some of the vendors website. If not I'll link it up.
 
  #9  
Old 08-01-2008
FullThrottle02's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: McHenry,IL
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would love to get both but funds are limited. I thought livewire 3 wasn't compatible with rangers? I may just wait until I can by both. They would be a great combination and compliment each other.

Jason
 
  #10  
Old 08-01-2008
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
I think the x-cal 3 is either out.. or will be avail before too long.

I'd suggest the scanguage. It'll not save you any fuel. But it will allow you to use it on other cars and *learn*. You can learn what mods have what effect, how to maximize your driving style, and you'll have more accurate fuel consumption recordings.

The x-cal w/a good tune will save fuel. But it's tied to your computer and really is best suited for folks who are into modding.

(I've got both btw)

Rich
 
  #11  
Old 08-01-2008
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Ive got both. Scangauge is sweet but really no added benefit besides monitoring sensors.

The xcal is a benefit IMO, it actually changes things on your truck

Scangauge does not change anything, you have to make the changes yourself in your driving habits to see better MPG
 
  #12  
Old 08-01-2008
Goodysgotacuda's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FullThrottle02
I do have a 4.0 and I have: headers, cat-back, cold air, udp's, plug wires, e-fan, and synthetic fluids. So it might benefit me, but I like the fact that I could fine tune my driving style to get better fuel economy. Also I wouldn't have to install after market gauges, as it is all in one.I usually drive about 5 mph over the speed limit, but I get there as fast as I can. I have a heavy lead foot. I don't know, I just need some opinions.

Looking back at this quote, admitting to having a lead foot and looking into a tool to watch for better mileage....doesn't that contradict itself? Are you actually going to drive 'better' according to the scangauge to get better mileage?
 
  #13  
Old 08-01-2008
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, I don't know if I'm different or not, I have both.

The x-cal was an AMAZING difference. Opened the truck up to a whole new world. Kevooo has it on his truck as well (as do many others), and I remember taking the first "test" drive with 35's and 4.10's on his 4.0, and my head going back into the seat hearing the tires chirp on the torque tune...it will not do that stock, or at least to that extent.

X-cal is without a doubt one of the best things to get better gas milage as well, as long as you whatch your foot (hence why everyone says a scangague). I am getting ~16 mixed. And I don't drive fast, but conservative. I get 14 w/o the tuner, I just took it back to stock tune for an entire tank, I track all my miles by GPS, not the odo, so it's accurate :)
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robert99ranger
General Ford Ranger Discussion
69
10-06-2009 11:05 PM
poor_boy_custom
General Technical & Electrical
9
04-20-2009 08:49 AM
robert99ranger
General Ford Ranger Discussion
10
12-25-2008 04:50 PM
robert99ranger
General Ford Ranger Discussion
13
12-16-2008 11:11 AM
Ranger Carl
General Ford Ranger Discussion
11
04-11-2008 10:06 PM



Quick Reply: Scan Gauge or X Cal - Next Mod?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 AM.