General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

Throttle Body Spacers!?

  #1  
Old 07-26-2006
fletch12518's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Havre De Grace,Md
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Throttle Body Spacers!?

do they even make em for my truck? are the worth getting? Just a ? thats all.
 
  #2  
Old 07-26-2006
jtslmn720's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent State, Kent Ohio
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
i remember reading somewhere that the throttle body on rangers is so small thats its not going to improve the engine much, if any...
 
  #3  
Old 07-26-2006
winks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jackson, New Jersey
Posts: 4,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do a search, I think they don't do anything for our trucks if I remember correctly.
 
  #4  
Old 07-26-2006
fletch12518's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Havre De Grace,Md
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah i heard like battles back and fourth about them. im stuck in the middle
 
  #5  
Old 07-26-2006
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by fletch12518
do they even make em for my truck? are the worth getting?
Yes. No. If you want to read more about TB spacers, there have been a few threads about them before.
 
  #6  
Old 07-26-2006
fletch12518's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Havre De Grace,Md
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nvm then.........
 
  #7  
Old 07-26-2006
KARPE's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Valrico, Fl 33594
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E-Fan, under-drive pulleys, intake filter change, exhaust, and Programmers.

Focus on these additions first, they are the easiest and and cheapest things to add or change to gain power and MPG. There are additional things you can alter, but until you have done all these things, don't worry about anything else on the market.
 
  #8  
Old 07-26-2006
fletch12518's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Havre De Grace,Md
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KARPE
E-Fan, under-drive pulleys, intake filter change, exhaust, and Programmers.

Focus on these additions first, they are the easiest and and cheapest things to add or change to gain power and MPG. There are additional things you can alter, but until you have done all these things, don't worry about anything else on the market.
Yeah that sounds good. Have the filter, need the cold air in take part.
 
  #9  
Old 07-26-2006
BRENSRANGER's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
it gave me 4 mpg better,and a little whine from the engine
 
  #10  
Old 07-26-2006
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Hmmm.

Fuel economy is a very big deal to automotive manufacturers. If a simple device could yield even a 0.1 MPG increase, it would be installed from the factory. Any engineer who could come up with a cheap or free way to improve FE by 1 full MPG would be worshipped as a god. 4 MPG from a TB spacer? No way.
 
  #11  
Old 07-26-2006
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Just arguing the .1 mpg thing Bob. Why don't rangers come from factory with electric fans which save more than .1 mpg?

Car manufactures care about profit. And efans probably cost more for them so they'd rather just use a lil more gas up with the old style fans
 
  #12  
Old 07-26-2006
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
Just arguing the .1 mpg thing Bob. Why don't rangers come from factory with electric fans which save more than .1 mpg?

Car manufactures care about profit. And efans probably cost more for them so they'd rather just use a lil more gas up with the old style fans
A manufacturer has to develop vehicles that will perform properly under the most extreme conditions that the they are likely to see.

Ordinary car-type electric fans won't pass desert cooling tests in trucks towing trailers at max GCWR. You really need a higher power fan for that and a more capable charging system than what is standard in a Ranger. Sure, lots of us get away with using electric fans under less strenuous conditions but they can't cut it in severe testing.

Ford could put a massive pusher/puller set up on a Ranger but the cost would be prohibitive, both for the fans themselves and for the charging system to support it. The other choice would be to severly downgrade the rated towing capacity but that would surely cost sales.

In the end, you have to come up with a balance between cost/benefit/sales.
 
  #13  
Old 07-26-2006
BRENSRANGER's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ok, more like 1 or 2 mpg ,but the whine is still their, lol
 
  #14  
Old 07-26-2006
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by danger93ranger
ok, more like 1 or 2 mpg ,but the whine is still their, lol
No offense but I don't believe that it gave any FE improvement. If you like the whine, maybe that's enough reason to own one.

Here's some good reading that shows these "magic" devices to be either worthless or actually detrimental to power and economy.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...s/1802932.html

http://autorepair.about.com/cs/gener...a022203a_3.htm
 
  #15  
Old 07-27-2006
fletch12518's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Havre De Grace,Md
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if they are that worthless idk why the hell people make em! jus pisses me off
 
  #16  
Old 07-27-2006
jtslmn720's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent State, Kent Ohio
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
its like an ad for gold coins that said that gold has risen in value 150% but the dow and nasdaq have dropped since 2001...and if anyone follows stocks, theyll know that the dow and nasdaq are reaching all time highs...


its just to get the uninformed people to buy it...
 
  #17  
Old 07-27-2006
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by fletch12518
if they are that worthless idk why the hell people make em! jus pisses me off
Because they are easy to make for a variety of engines and easy to install.

I find the throttle body spacer idea to be ludicrous. You'll notice that companies make spacers for virtually every popular engine out there. That implies that every dyno facility at every major manufacturer got the intake manifold dimensions wrong and that they are all too short! What do you think the odds are of that happening?

Now I'm not saying that every intake manifold in the world is perfectly optimized. Actually, a manifold can't be optimized for every RPM and load. But you know what? You never see an aftermarket company offering a mod to shorten one. I would think that, statistically, at least once in awhile some of the "stupid" factory engineers would have come with a dimension that is too long instead of too short.

Again, I think it comes down to this: an engine-specific spacer is very easy to make and easy for the consumer to install. Add a few BS claims about mixture enhancement and swirl and you have a saleable product. And that means money in someone's pocket.
 
  #18  
Old 07-27-2006
BRENSRANGER's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i agree,but my truck got 1 to 2 mpg better,it works on my truck,the price of one sucks a$$ though
 
  #19  
Old 06-14-2007
ringer4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
this devices just don't make sense especially on a modern fuel injected vechicle..they aren't spinning fuel and air which would make some sense just spinning air ( fuel doesn't get injected until right before the cylinder) only way i would consider one is is if they isolated the tb from heat ( coolant line to tb would also would to be elimitated to get full benefit) however that could cause some driveability issues especially in colder weather- this wouldn't increase fuel mileage though i believe one of the reasons the tb is heated fromthe factry is to increase fuel mileage
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
insistent
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
3
08-11-2014 02:37 PM
jaycheetwood
General Technical & Electrical
11
09-18-2008 03:01 PM
dangelj316
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
34
11-17-2007 12:41 AM
3.slow
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
18
06-01-2007 07:49 PM
PharmRanger4x4
General Technical & Electrical
3
04-08-2005 09:48 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Throttle Body Spacers!?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:00 AM.