Performance test: Thunderbolt catback duals vs. factory - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource
Ford Ranger Forum - Forums for Ford Ranger enthusiast!

Go Back   Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource Arrow Ranger-Forums Technical Forum Arrow General Technical & Electrical

General Technical & Electrical General technical and electrical discussion for the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-15-2006
rwenzing's Avatar
Thread Starter

RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
I am: Bob .
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Vehicle: 2003 Ford Ranger
Drive Type: 4x4
Engine: 5.0
Posts: 7,773
Total Props: 19
Performance test: Thunderbolt catback duals vs. factory

I have been wondering how the performance of the SLP/Roush/Hillbank Thunderbolt dual exhaust compares to the factory muffler/tailpipe. When SLP offered this exhaust as part of a performance option on the Thunderbolt Rangers, they claimed a 15 HP increase when used along with their cone filter. It doesn't feel that much stronger to me but sometimes it's hard to make an objective evaluation when the sound is different.

Lacking a dyno, I decided to run a simple acceleration test. This is not very scientific, just a back-to-back comparison. I scouted the local roads and found a deserted piece of country road with good visibility and no driveways or cross roads. A line of telephone poles provided convenient start and finish markers.

In an attempt to eliminate as much variability as possible, only one gear was used along with a rolling start. That way there would be no clutch launch or shifting involved. For each run, I rolled up to the starting point at 40 MPH on the cruise in third gear and did a WOT stomp until I had completed three telephone pole intervals. At the last pole, I noted the indicated speed on the speedometer.

This should be a good real world test with the initial RPM at about 2500 on the tach and the final approaching 5000.

After three repetitions, I returned home and swapped the exhaust. This is actually much easier than it sounds - just jack up the truck to let the axle drop, remove the spare, pop off the 3~4 isolation biscuits, remove two bolts and slide the whole system out over the rear axle. On my 4x4, this works for both the factory system and the fully assembled duals.

Doing the swap and running the two sets of trials on the same day minimized any possible effects due to differences in temperature, humidity or barometric pressure. The wind was calm throughout the day and the skies were overcast. My overhead console was reading 45F during the first tests and 45F in the second group as well.

All tests were run at WOT in third gear from a 40 MPH rolling start with the same start and finish points. The truck weighed the same except for the added weight of the duals which weigh more than twice as much as the stocker. Here are the results (indicated finish line speeds in MPH):

Factory Exhaust:

Thunderbolt Exhaust:

I should also mention that my engine is nearly stock. I have the intake silencer removed from the airbox, a set of JBA headers and synthetic 5W30 in the crankcase - that's it. Another truck with significant breathing mods might possibly make better use of this exhaust.

So, obviously, if you are looking for a big performance gain with a stock Ranger, this is not the answer. It is a good looking and good sounding exhaust system at a great price. I'm still glad I bought it.

2003 FX4 Level II, Supercharged 5.0L V8, Headers,Duals 4R70W auto, BW4406 manual T/C
Aussie Locker, Torsen L/S, 4.10's, Bilstein 7100 rezzies, Cadillac/Mustang rear discs, Duff traction bars
Keypad Entry, Lock LEDs, ABS switch, sway bar discos, Heated seats, Explorer EATC, Trip Computer and consoles

5.0L V8 swap: Click
Supercharger: Click

2003 XLT 2.3L M5OD-R1 reg cab beater, 2011 Taurus SEL, 2016 C-MAX Energi Plug-in Hybrid
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 02-15-2006
92 Ranger's Avatar
I am: Kurt W
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Raleigh NC
Vehicle: 1992 Ford Ranger Stx
Posts: 1,229
Total Props: 0
awsome write up bob... good info!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 02-15-2006
I am: Kristoffer Jusnes
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC
Vehicle: 1972 Ford Gran Torino 2-Door Formal Roof
Posts: 506
Total Props: 0
Bravo, Bob!
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 02-15-2006
HarryTasker's Avatar
I am: Kyle R
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Vehicle: 1996 Ranger Splash
Posts: 1,490
Total Props: 0
Isn't this pretty common with most exhausts on an engine with the stock intake?
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 02-15-2006
Unregistered User
Posts: n/a
Total Props: 0
Hey Bob...

I have Leo's old 75mm Pro-M maf thats been calibrated for 24lb injectors.. Might be fun to digimoto ( you have an ecc5 with 03/stick + codes unaltered, same as what mine used to be ) the results and see what happens as you have stock wheels/tires and no ' machine ' work done. Can calculate quarter mine, torque curve and cfm statistics between the 2 exhausts...

I plan on being out your way sometime in the near future as I have to drop some items off for others.

Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lookin to get duals tonkaranger04 Exterior Semi-Tech 10 07-13-2006 07:11 AM
Duals For 06 Ranger Sport 3.0 draco28303 2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech 5 06-10-2006 11:53 AM
Catback Duals on the '05 bmwysocki Exterior Semi-Tech 13 03-18-2006 04:34 PM
test drove a thunderbolt blue_bandit General Ford Ranger Discussion 15 02-14-2006 04:29 PM
trailer hitch & duals gatorblue92 General Ford Ranger Discussion 19 03-19-2005 10:39 AM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 PM.