New Ideas Have a new idea for your Ford Ranger? General discussion of new ideas for the Ford Ranger.

2 row radiator (3.0 & 4.0)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-25-2006
sawred's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 row radiator (3.0 & 4.0)

This should be a simple bolt-on (I'll know later for sure) for those looking for more cooling for their 3.0 or 4.0 (seems we use the same radiator guys..which seems a bit odd)

Here's the specs from http://www.radiatorbarn.com

Specifications (2003 3.0 Ranger)
Core Size: 20-3/4 X 23-5/8 X 1
Inlet Header: 3 X 23-3/4
Outlet Header: 3 X 23-3/4
Inlet Connection: 1-1/2 PASSENGERS SIDE
Outlet Connection: 1-1/2 DRIVERS SIDE
Transmission Oil Cooler: 12 (7 PLT)
Engine Oil Cooler: NONE
Mounting: TOP FLANGE/BOTTOM CRADLE
Notes: ONE ROW, PLASTIC TANKS/ALUMINUM CORE

Specifications (2003 4.0 Ranger)
Core Size: 20-3/4 X 23-5/8 X 1
Inlet Header: 3 X 23-3/4
Outlet Header: 3 X 23-3/4
Inlet Connection: 1-1/2 PASSENGERS SIDE
Outlet Connection: 1-1/2 DRIVERS SIDE
Transmission Oil Cooler: 12 (7 PLT)
Engine Oil Cooler: NONE
Mounting: TOP FLANGE/BOTTOM CRADLE
Notes: ONE ROW, PLASTIC TANKS/ALUMINUM CORE

Specifications (1998 5.0 Explorer)
Core Size: 20-13/16 X 23-5/8 X 2-3/16
Inlet Header: 3 X 23-3/4
Outlet Header: 3 X 23-3/4
Inlet Connection: 1-1/2 PASSENGERS SIDE
Outlet Connection: 1-1/2 DRIVERS SIDE
Transmission Oil Cooler: 12 (7 PLT)
Engine Oil Cooler: NONE
Mounting: TOP FLANGE/BOTTOM CRADLE
Notes: TWO ROW, PLASTIC TANKS/ALUMINUM CORE


The connections are the same size and on the proper side and the dimension (width or height I'm not sure which...I usually go WxH so in that case it would be the W) is only off about 1/16". The depth obviously is doubled. Actually the one I saw was 1-3/16" deeper (stock 3.0's is 1"D). I am just having the guys at the shop make sure I have at least 2-3" between the fan now and the motor.

Note: I also have a Pro-Form E-Fan for a 5.0 so you'll have to check your clearance with either your sotck clutch fan or your aftermarket E-Fan.
 

Last edited by sawred; 04-25-2006 at 03:14 PM.
  #2  
Old 04-25-2006
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
May not be too much of a problem for me. I have my fan mounted in the stock shroud, and there's space in there. Pretty good find and something I AM considering, Mike, thanks!
 
  #3  
Old 04-25-2006
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
good find, now just get yourself an electric fan and dont worry about clearance. with the e fan you should have around 3"-4" extra of clearance between the back of the fan and the water pump nose.
 
  #4  
Old 04-25-2006
sawred's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks. Glad I could help!

Already have an E-fan. Well, half of one left :p haha But the new one will be here tomorrow. I am fairly sure there is at least 2-3" there...I had my hand in there trying to break the other blades...but I know it was a tight fit.
 
  #5  
Old 04-25-2006
advantEDGE's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you might if it becomes a problem just get one of those "pusher" efans and mount it on the front, right?
 
  #6  
Old 04-25-2006
sawred's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my fan is a pusher fan but it's wired in reverse to pull it through instead of push it out. not sure if it would mount on the front though...hmm

i took a look tonight and it's probably gonna be a tight fit...keyword fit..well tight too.
but there was probably 2" there. Not the factor of safety I'd like but I guess it'll be an experiement.
 
  #7  
Old 04-25-2006
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I thought reversed s-blade fans didn't move as much air?

Mine is reversible, but the blades are symmetrical -- which makes it noisier, lol. Still, mine has been very abused in water crossings and lives on.
 
  #8  
Old 05-01-2006
sawred's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately I haven't been able to head up this little project and had to turn it over to my mechanic. He said he tried about 2 hours trying to get the Explorer radiator in there and couldn't get it mounted. Since I wasn't there I don't know what the issue is. I will try to get details as to why it wouldn't mount. Maybe the dimensions are similar and the fittings are correct but the actual mounts are different. IDK. I may stop at a radiator shop to see if they have one of each to compare.

EDIT: Last heard from shop that the two radiators were very similar but they couldn't get the radiator into the slot (I think). He also noted the pro-form fan would have hit the pullies. (Depth is 4.000". Flex-a-lite's Black Magic is 4.250". Flex-a-lite does offer a low-profile line of slimmer e-fans along the lines of 2.625" in depth)

So for now the stock radiator will stay and I'm getting a larger second trans cooler, 180 T-stat and switching to syn. ATF. I may look into this option or another option (custom radiator or heck, why not just mount the radiator in the bed with some dual e-fans like a race truck )
 

Last edited by sawred; 05-01-2006 at 03:16 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
njdriver04
SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines
6
01-13-2012 01:34 PM
Bmwlover540i
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
5
04-17-2007 09:58 PM



Quick Reply: 2 row radiator (3.0 & 4.0)



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:08 PM.