I'm in Freakin' Mullet Hair Blowing in the Wind Love!
#52
11-02-2009
looks a little like a 71 Judge...but then I looked back at pics of a 73 T-A...
my question is this: If they based the 5th-gen Camaro off the 1st-gen Camaro, then why not style the 5th-gen T-A off the 1st-gen T-A, instead of a 2nd-gen?
I dunno, I think I'd pass on it. I'll stick with the new Challenger.
my question is this: If they based the 5th-gen Camaro off the 1st-gen Camaro, then why not style the 5th-gen T-A off the 1st-gen T-A, instead of a 2nd-gen?
I dunno, I think I'd pass on it. I'll stick with the new Challenger.
#53
11-02-2009
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CC, Indiana
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#54
11-02-2009
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Robinson, Pa
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#58
11-03-2009
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Owensboro, KY
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
looks a little like a 71 Judge...but then I looked back at pics of a 73 T-A...
my question is this: If they based the 5th-gen Camaro off the 1st-gen Camaro, then why not style the 5th-gen T-A off the 1st-gen T-A, instead of a 2nd-gen?
I dunno, I think I'd pass on it. I'll stick with the new Challenger.
my question is this: If they based the 5th-gen Camaro off the 1st-gen Camaro, then why not style the 5th-gen T-A off the 1st-gen T-A, instead of a 2nd-gen?
I dunno, I think I'd pass on it. I'll stick with the new Challenger.
morris-
and specs for 2010 camaro and mustang
camaro-
6.2L v8
hp- 426@5900
tq-420@4600
curb weight-3849lbs
price-$32k
mustang-
4.6L v8
hp-316@6000
tq-325@4250
curb weight-3483
price-$32k
#62
11-03-2009
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#63
11-03-2009
#64
11-03-2009
im a huge fan of the trans ams. i currently am rebuilding a 85 ta. the white one shown here is the first ive seen of that body kit. heres a link to another one that i like better. its generally the same but has some slight differences. the white one would have been better if they had put smaller rims on itand cut the gfx height down about 4 inches. 15x7 rims in the front and 16x8 in the rear with some 265's would have been good.
http://www.ridelust.com/wp-content/u...trans-am-1.jpg
http://www.ridelust.com/wp-content/u...trans-am-1.jpg
#65
11-03-2009
#66
11-03-2009
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#67
11-03-2009
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#68
11-04-2009
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Owensboro, KY
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fx4wannabe01
General Technical & Electrical
15
04-17-2007 09:07 PM
Austin1
General Ford Ranger Discussion
25
04-17-2007 05:55 PM
