Suspension Tech General discussion of suspension for the Ford Ranger.

Rear suspension upgrade - Bilstein 7100 shocks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-16-2006
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Rear suspension upgrade - Bilstein 7100 shocks

I recently installed a set of Bilstein 7100 reservoir shock absorbers on the front of my Ranger:
https://www.ranger-forums.com/forum2...ad.php?t=27975

I liked how the swap turned out, so I decided to get a matching set of 7100's for the rear of the truck. I chose a set of 12" travel 'short body' shocks that have almost exactly the same compressed length as stock Ranger 4x4 shocks but allow 2" of additional rebound travel.

My original (wishful) thinking was that, unlike the front, the rear swap would be a simple bolt-on. Well, not exactly. It turned out that there were a couple of problems to overcome.

The first issue was the mounts. These are universal shocks that are sold under the assumption that mounts will be built specifically for them. They are not offered as a direct replacement for any specific OE shock absorber.

7100s come from Bilstein with very nice 1/2" bore Heim joints installed. That's fine for the Ranger lower mounts which use 12mm bolts and Bilstein had thoughtfully included 1/2" to 12mm adapters.

The upper mount is a different story. Rangers have a shouldered stud mount on top that has a 16mm OD. That is very close to 5/8" and there is obviously no way that a 1/2" Heim is going to slide on to a ~5/8" stud. I ended up removing the upper Heims and substituting some polyurethane bushings leftover from a James Duff traction bar kit. All I had to do to make them fit was turn a 26mm OD step on each JD bushing to match the ID of the Bilstein upper eye.

Now I thought I was truly home free .... until I tried to mount the driver side shock. The reservoir hose exits the shock body at about 45 degrees. If the hose is aimed up, it runs directly into the bottom of the bed with no room to turn. Flip the shock over and the hose fitting hits part of the spare tire crossmember.

Undaunted, I ripped the box off and broke out the MIG. To make some room for the reservoir hose, I cut a notch in the crossmember and reinforced it with side plates welded in. There weren't many options for the mounting of the reservoir itself. I finally decided to put it between the evap canister and the spare tire winch. A piece of motorcycle exhaust tubing was welded to the spare bracket to make a place to clamp the polyurethane reservoir mounts that came with the shocks. In this location, the Schrader valve can be accessed easily with the spare dropped. The bed still has to be lifted to remove the DS shock but that was a given regardless of where the reservoir was placed.



By comparison, the passenger side was easy. I just used the curve on the top edge of the frame as a mounting point and clamped it on.

 

Last edited by V8 Level II; 09-16-2006 at 08:31 PM.
  #2  
Old 09-16-2006
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Geez Bob... way to make me feel inferior AGAIN!
 
  #3  
Old 09-16-2006
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Huntsville, Tx
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah. dont work too hard on that. nice work. im more of a OEM fit kinda person
 
  #4  
Old 09-16-2006
pastfinder's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awesome work Bob! I just installed your old Bilsteins :)
 
  #5  
Old 09-16-2006
EdGe_wannabe's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 4,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are the shiz-nazz Bob. Dang man, many props.

Brenton
 
  #6  
Old 09-16-2006
HighRollerII's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 10,073
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
looks good bob..ive always wanted some of those with the seperate resv.
 
  #7  
Old 09-16-2006
rngprerunner's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Awesome Bob! Very cool!

So how's it ride?
 
  #8  
Old 09-16-2006
r0ng5's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 2,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by texasbullseye89
yeah. dont work too hard on that. nice work. im more of a OEM fit kinda person
I think that's what Bob was going for.. and it turned out freakin crazy.



---

damn.. 7100's up front AND back?!? that's insane. How DOES it right?
 
  #9  
Old 09-17-2006
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by rngprerunner
Awesome Bob! Very cool!

So how's it ride?
I haven't had it off road yet but I have tried a couple of washboard dirt roads. The front is great but the rear is a little bit choppy. I guess that you have to expect some of that in a nearly stock small pickup.

At first, I was concerned that the Ranger damping stack wouldn't be compatible with the full size Chevy spring swap but, when I checked the Bilstein valving guide, the recommended damping was the same for both Rangers and full size pickups (255/70).
 
  #10  
Old 09-17-2006
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
When you talk about valving stack, is that more or less the 'stiffness' of the shock? Would softening them up do any good on the dirt roads? Or would you want them stiffer?
 
  #11  
Old 09-17-2006
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Gearhead61
When you talk about valving stack, is that more or less the 'stiffness' of the shock? Would softening them up do any good on the dirt roads? Or would you want them stiffer?
Yes, Bilstein offers 6 different valving options for the 7100s. I am using Bilstein's recommended settings:

Front:
Part number suffix "06" AKA 360/80
This is 800 Newtons compression force and 3600 Newtons rebound force measured at 0.52 meter/sec.

Rear:
Part number suffix "04" AKA 255/70.
This is 700 Newtons compression force and 2550 N rebound force measured at 0.52 m/s.

Higher numbers mean more restrictive or "firmer" damping. Lower numbers are softer. The shocks can be disassembled and revalved to any of the 6 settings. I am going to drive them for awhile as received to see if there is any break-in change. They can always be revalved later if necessary.
 
  #12  
Old 09-17-2006
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
nice job.....
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
teddy
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
3
01-21-2015 09:32 PM
Scallion02EDGE
OLD - Ranger Based Vehicles
1
06-18-2013 12:28 PM
Scott B.
OLD - Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
0
09-25-2011 06:34 PM
Jakespeeds
OLD - Ranger Based Vehicles
3
07-02-2010 07:11 AM
V8 Level II
Suspension Tech
20
09-08-2006 05:08 PM



Quick Reply: Rear suspension upgrade - Bilstein 7100 shocks



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 AM.