Suspension Tech General discussion of suspension for the Ford Ranger.

IFS vs TIB

  #1  
Old 10-26-2006
rangerdan01's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IFS vs TIB

Ive got some money put teogeather to buy a new truck, I would like to go with another ranger but I dont know what I want to go with( IFS or TIB) what are some of the pros and cons of the two. I need a second opnions. I want to buil the truck so it can handle a little bit of everything from climbing small rocks to good old mudslinging.
 
  #2  
Old 10-26-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tib is a 2wd system, do you want a 4x4? 4x4 is either TTB or IFS.

2wd? for mud slinging and rock climbing?

if you want a 4x4 between the two systems, i hear greater things about the TTB than the IFS.
 
  #3  
Old 10-26-2006
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah i'd got TTB because it would be pretty painless to swap in a solid axle! However if the truck is going to spend most it's life on the road then i'd go IFS for on road comfort.
 
  #4  
Old 10-26-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonic04Edge
Yeah i'd get TTB because it would be pretty painless to swap in a solid axle! However if the truck is going to spend most it's life on the road then i'd go IFS for on road comfort.
ya, if you plan to use it on the road ifs might be more comfortable. if not the ttb has similar traits to a solid axle or c be swapped to a solid axle
 
  #5  
Old 10-27-2006
Joush's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Marshalls Creek, PA
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TTB (or TIB) is IFS. TTB is costs less to lift than A-arms. as to which is better its up to you lifted TTBs have more wheel travel than lifted A-arm rangers do.
 
  #6  
Old 10-27-2006
rangerdan01's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am looking for a 4x4, it will spend a good amount of time on the road but also I would like to run around a 33. I hear that IFS doesnt hasnt bigger tires that well.Is it true
 
  #7  
Old 10-27-2006
Bumpncarstereo's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: btwn the Buff and the Roc
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok help the noob out, i know what IFS is but what is TTB, and TIB? torsen bar?
 
  #8  
Old 10-27-2006
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
TTB= Twin Traction Beam (the front suspension system used on the '97 and older Ranger 4x4 models.)
TIB= Twin "I" Beam (the front suspension system used on the '97 and older Ranger 4x2 models.)

ALL FRONT SUSPENSIONS IN RANGERS ARE IFS.....Independent Front Suspension.....just they had 2 different designs of the IFS....

The TTB is a good off road design, but isn't too practical for on road driving.....because the way it pivots, it allows the inner part of the tire to contact the road more, causing faster inner tire wear........they are GREAT off road because they pivot in the center of the truck allowing for one side to fully flex, and the other to have a the full contact patch of the tire on the ground...........

in a 2wd....the TIB is a good for desert trucks because you can get extreme travel from how they pivot in the center of the truck......

both are super cheap to lift compared to the new SLA front suspensions.....The TTB and TIB are very simular to a solid axle, but are still a IFS suspension.......the TTB and TIB are less complicated, and have less parts to try to drop when in a lifting condition....you can have a TTB or TIB suspension out of a truck in no time........

It took gumby, scott, and myself about 30 minutes to get 1 side of mine almost out last Saturday.....PS- scott was even working on his race car....
 
  #9  
Old 10-27-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would go TTB....PERSONALLY!
 
  #10  
Old 10-27-2006
xp1ik99's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lexington Park, MD
Posts: 3,230
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
get something with a straight axle....(hint-01 or older dodge ram.....)
 
  #11  
Old 10-27-2006
Big04Ranger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Avon, IN
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or you can be like me and go strait on an 04 w/ 35k miles...
 
  #12  
Old 10-27-2006
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
the larger tire comment a TTB or the newer IFS sysems BOTH dont like tires over 35" the TTB will handle it better but still not recommeded. if you want to SAS it later on your 100% better off going TTB then doing a SAS is 10X easier because it already has a steering box and coil buckets.
 
  #13  
Old 10-27-2006
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
the larger tire comment a TTB or the newer IFS sysems BOTH dont like tires over 35" the TTB will handle it better but still not recommeded. if you want to SAS it later on your 100% better off going TTB then doing a SAS is 10X easier because it already has a steering box and coil buckets.
have a miller....cause that is a good call!
 
  #14  
Old 10-27-2006
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ft Hood, TX
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
have a miller....cause that is a good call!
LMAO. and when he gets a ttb we can say "good desision". lol.
 
  #15  
Old 10-27-2006
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
have a miller....cause that is a good call!
acully good job now i want a beer i get off at midnight and I am heading to Kroger and getting a 6 pack of miller genuin select lol...
 
  #16  
Old 10-27-2006
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
lol........
 
  #17  
Old 11-01-2006
_97_4X4_'s Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
the larger tire comment a TTB or the newer IFS sysems BOTH dont like tires over 35" the TTB will handle it better but still not recommeded. if you want to SAS it later on your 100% better off going TTB then doing a SAS is 10X easier because it already has a steering box and coil buckets.
The steering box is a DEFINATE advantage of the TTB... the coil buckets are only good if you are using an early bronco D44 and are keeping the front coil springs... I am going w/ a waggy D44 so the coil buckets serve no purpose to me... but I do agree... seems much easier to swap a solid axle in a TTB Ranger...
 
  #18  
Old 11-01-2006
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
ya i would rather have coils then leafs just me... and also its good for jeep axles that have coils...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djboldt@hughes.net
Drivetrain Tech
3
11-15-2010 04:25 PM
5speedin2.3
Suspension Tech
13
08-16-2007 10:14 PM
5speedin2.3
Suspension Tech
9
11-15-2006 05:07 PM
sawred
Suspension Tech
34
07-28-2005 10:57 PM
loneFX4
Suspension Tech
49
02-01-2005 02:02 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: IFS vs TIB



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 AM.