Suspension Tech General discussion of suspension for the Ford Ranger.

pictures of my torsion lift

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2004
  #1  
exjnv's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock Ga
The Grudge

Name:  dfaa927c.jpg
Views: 1751
Size:  101.0 KB
Name:  aac83fc6.jpg
Views: 797
Size:  123.4 KB

i have the 51 series rock crawler extreme steel wheels and im just saving money for tires then im doing exhaust and eventually whipple[/img]
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #2  
Lone Ranger 93's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: ***
Lift is good :D .
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #3  
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 874
Likes: 2
From: outside Detroit, where it's safer
It isn't technically a lift though.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #4  
Lone Ranger 93's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: ***
Cranking the torsion bars to gain 1-1.5" of lift is not a lift how?
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #5  
optikal illushun's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
from daveandjulie: It wouldn't make any difference what you do with the preload on the torsion bars, you can fit the same size tires whether you mess with the preload or not. All you've done is affect the ride height by increasing the preload on the spring. And all that does is change where the suspension sits in the suspension cycle when it is static. It doesn't change anything about the original suspension travel as those points are all still exactly the same as they were before. When you bottom your suspension it, and whatever tire you have, will be in the same place no matter what the preload on the spring is.

You've increased driveline angles, if you have 4wd which will wear the cv joints sooner, decreased ride quality, decreased the suspensions ability to absorb road imperfections, and reduced traction and braking efficiency because the suspension does hot have sufficient static sag and therefore limited or no downtravel.

Playing with the t-bars has only negative effects as far as suspension functionality goes, the only arguably positive thing that comes from it is purely asthetic.
best way i can sum it up...
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #6  
Trevelyn1015's Avatar
Still El Presidente...
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,903
Likes: 6
From: Texas
well, amazingly i couldn't fit the 32's on my truck until i cranked the t-bars... and they rubbed, so we cranked a little more, and now they don't rub...
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #7  
Bigwill41's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,659
Likes: 0
From: Navasota, Texas
It looks good now. :)
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #8  
Lone Ranger 93's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: ***
So leveling coils or leveling spacers on a TTB are not a lift? Because all it does it change the hieght of the suspension when it is static? It does not increase your flex or suspension travel anymore because you are still being limited by the stock axle pivot brackets, radius arms, and such? But you said you can fit the same size tires with or without a crank of the torsion bar, Trevelyn said he fit 32's with the crank and leveling spacers on a gen 3 will allow 33x10.50s with no rubbing. So I still am confused with this not being a "lift". It's not a "lift kit" for sure, but increasing the ride height seems like it would consitute a lift. And you did say cranking the T bars is a result from this...

I'm not trying to be rude or anything, I just don't know much about the 98+ IFS suspension and learning more never hurts :) .
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #9  
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 874
Likes: 2
From: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Originally Posted by Trevelyn1015
well, amazingly i couldn't fit the 32's on my truck until i cranked the t-bars... and they rubbed, so we cranked a little more, and now they don't rub...
There are two possible explinations for that. It could be because you have increased the spring rate so much that the suspension no longer flexes enough during the impacts experienced in your normal driving so that the tire never moves far enough to rub. Or it could be that the tires didn't fit when the suspension was in the area of the cycle that it was with the stock preload setting, and now that you've changed it they will fit. In either case, the tire will still rub exactly as it did before if the suspension is subjected to the right load to move to the place in its cycle where the tire will rub.

The point I am trying to make it that the torsion bar is not a ride height adjustment, it is a spring preload adjustment. It does affect the ride height of the vehicle, but it does so with consequences to the spring rate. A real ride height adjustment does nothing but change the ride height, the preload on the spring itself is unaffected. Stock Rangers do not have that feature.

Only negative things come from adjusting the preload on the torsion bar, I can't think of anything functionally positive.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #10  
Wowak's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 2
From: Merritt Island, FL
Originally Posted by Lone Ranger 93
So leveling coils or leveling spacers on a TTB are not a lift? Because all it does it change the hieght of the suspension when it is static? It does not increase your flex or suspension travel anymore because you are still being limited by the stock axle pivot brackets, radius arms, and such? But you said you can fit the same size tires with or without a crank of the torsion bar, Trevelyn said he fit 32's with the crank and leveling spacers on a gen 3 will allow 33x10.50s with no rubbing. So I still am confused with this not being a "lift". It's not a "lift kit" for sure, but increasing the ride height seems like it would consitute a lift. And you did say cranking the T bars is a result from this...

I'm not trying to be rude or anything, I just don't know much about the 98+ IFS suspension and learning more never hurts :) .
Basically, no matter how the T-bar is adjusted, its NEVER going to change the highest and lowest travel points for the suspension, thus its not a lift in the conventional sense. Its the equivalent of changing spring rates so that *AT REST* the truck sits up higher, but the suspension will still have full range of travel, and bigger wheels will STILL bottom out sooner when flexing or driving off-road. Only changing the actual mounting point of the wheel relative the vehicle frame constitutes a suspension lift. Thats why I would argue that a spindle lift is a genuine lift, although it doesn't modify the suspension, it moves the mounting point of the wheel lower, having the same desired effect.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #11  
Lone Ranger 93's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: ***
Originally Posted by Dave and Julie
There are two possible explinations for that. It could be because you have increased the spring rate so much that the suspension no longer flexes enough during the impacts experienced in your normal driving so that the tire never moves far enough to rub. Or it could be that the tires didn't fit when the suspension was in the area of the cycle that it was with the stock preload setting, and now that you've changed it they will fit. In either case, the tire will still rub exactly as it did before if the suspension is subjected to the right load to move to the place in its cycle where the tire will rub.

The point I am trying to make it that the torsion bar is not a ride height adjustment, it is a spring preload adjustment. It does affect the ride height of the vehicle, but it does so with consequences to the spring rate. A real ride height adjustment does nothing but change the ride height, the preload on the spring itself is unaffected. Stock Rangers do not have that feature.

Only negative things come from adjusting the preload on the torsion bar, I can't think of anything functionally positive.
Agreed! but.... I'm still confused why an increase in ride height is not a "lift" as you stated earlier. Let's say Trevelyn was just nipping the fenders with 32's at stock height. Cranking the T bars could of possibly gave just enough "lift" to clear the fenders, therefore no more rubbing.

On that note about negative things a result from this, I totally agree with ya there! Ford did not intend for their rangers to be modified, among others, so would it be safe to assume any major modification will adversely affect the behavior of the truck because Ford did not intend for the vehicle to be subject to this sort of modifcation?
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #12  
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 874
Likes: 2
From: outside Detroit, where it's safer
It's not really a Ford thing per se. It's a general suspension thing. You need a certain amount of static sag (roughly 30%) for a suspension to perform well. If you put so much preload into the spring that the suspension sits at the top of it's travel you'll have no static sag, no down travel. You need down travel to get the best performance.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #13  
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
The ONLY positive thing, and there is one, is the extra ground and tire clearance. Other than that I agree. However, mine are cranked about an inch anyway and that puts the ride height measurement right at the top of the Ford spec, as they measure it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #14  
Lone Ranger 93's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: ***
Hopefully the guy who created this post learned a thing or 2 also!
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #15  
Wowak's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 2
From: Merritt Island, FL
Hopefully everyone who reads this is learning a thing or two!
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #17  
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 874
Likes: 2
From: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Of course if they droop the bars should be adjusted to put the front end back in spec.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #18  
Skyjacker_44's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 1
From: Hillsboro,Texas
heres my deffinition step one

Go take a messuring tape put the end on the ground "beside front tire" extend tape until u reach the fender
step 2 scrible down the number u got...now go twist ur t bars and take the number again.......

if it's higher than it was when u first did it wala lifted lol
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #19  
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
PIC REQUEST: Switches!

That's a lousy procedure. Move the truck and bounce the suspension before making the second measurement or you may have problems and get more than you want!
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #20  
Dave and Julie's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 874
Likes: 2
From: outside Detroit, where it's safer
Originally Posted by 04 EDGE
i personaly would like to see some hard facts as to when you should never adjust the preload on torsion bars!
For you I will change my wording so that "you shouldn't mess with the torsion bars" is now "the torsion bars should only be adjusted as neccessary to keep them within the manufacturers specifications".

We already agree that they should not be adjusted until the bolt bottoms out.

I haven't looked, but does the Ford spec call for at ride height bushing installation for the front end? Adjusting the torsion bar preload also twists the bushings which can cause premature failure.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2004
  #21  
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
No, as far as I've seen only the t-bar twist is used.
 
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2004
  #22  
SONICEDGE03's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Tryon, NC
I am going to have to crank mine, I am actually starting to get some negative camber going on. You can see that both of the front tires are tilted in at the top a little. Just enough to bug the heck out of me. What are these explorer torsion bars that you speak of? This sounds interesting.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004
  #23  
DownSouthTAS's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, SC
You can get Explorer Sport Trac torsion bars, I would get load rating B. They are about a hundred bucks for the pair and bolt right up.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
01RangerEdge
OLD - Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
7
Jan 10, 2013 05:01 AM
00RedRangerXLT
Snapshots
2
May 10, 2011 09:33 PM
RangerNVS
OLD - Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
26
Jan 22, 2010 10:28 AM
jrpro130
Snapshots
50
Jan 2, 2009 06:24 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 AM.