2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

dif. between 01 3.0 and 04 3.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-24-2006
hpyford's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stuart
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dif. between 01 3.0 and 04 3.0

i was the owner of a 2001 edge 3.0 2wd with 3:73 gears. after totalling it a week ago today. https://www.ranger-forums.com/forum2...ad.php?t=27034 i am now challenged with the daunting task of finding another truck within my price range. while looking, i drove a 2004 ranger edge 3.0 2wd 5 speed. same as mine with the exception of this one being an extended cab. my question is whether or not there is any engine tweaks from 01 to 04. i can easily tell the 04 would pull a lot better than my 01 would. it felt even more peppy in 3rd. are these the same motors or are there some adjustments?
 
  #2  
Old 08-24-2006
Pinecone's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing.
 
  #3  
Old 08-24-2006
SanityAside's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe the 2004 ranger you drove had 4.10 gearing
 
  #4  
Old 08-24-2006
hpyford's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stuart
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well that's what i don't understand. it allegedly has 3:73 gears also. so i have no clue. i did notice a plastic cover over the manifold on the 04, whereas on the 01 it is just ceramic showing. i know that makes no dif. to the motor though
 
  #5  
Old 08-24-2006
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'04+ have less horsepower.. i believe 150-152hp for the 98-03ish 3.0L's then the hp went down to 148 in 04.. They changed to a composite intake manifold in 2002, but other than that, nothing really.
 
  #6  
Old 08-24-2006
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
the hp did change minimally during those years... as far as the rear on the truck you are looking at there is a axle code on the vin sticker on the doorjamb that will tell you what you have... the code sheet can be found here
http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/Axles.html
 
  #7  
Old 08-24-2006
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
#1 advice do not ever ever buy another 3.0L stick with 4.0L's you will be so much happier
 
  #8  
Old 08-24-2006
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
#1 advice do not ever ever buy another 3.0L stick with 4.0L's you will be so much happier
i love my 3.0 stick... but i drive slow even when i drive fast cars so im not the best judge
 
  #9  
Old 08-24-2006
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by gatorblue92
i love my 3.0 stick... but i drive slow even when i drive fast cars so im not the best judge
BLA put me in a fast car or not even a fast car and i turn into a kind on speed going insane i cant do that...thats another reason i tend to never care about MPG lol...
 
  #10  
Old 08-24-2006
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hell you dont even have to drive fast to get a fast car to.. go fast :P
 
  #11  
Old 08-24-2006
jtslmn720's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent State, Kent Ohio
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
yea id go with the 4.0 if all possible, i would have but in my price range it was only the 4.0 ohv and i dont have that much money to throw around on filling up my tank often...
 
  #12  
Old 08-24-2006
Roach2004's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There is a diffrence it has to do with the MAF I dont know what it is but they make difrent CAI for them.
 
  #13  
Old 08-24-2006
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
some 3.0's came without a egr system too... i think the 04 has them and the 01 didnt... no idea why
 
  #14  
Old 08-24-2006
Rand's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Barberton,Ohio
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the MAF is now part of the airbox instead of after the airbox.
 
  #15  
Old 08-25-2006
Mr. Special's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is a difference. The 2001-2003s have 148hp and 2004+ have 154hp. But to have it pull that much harder the 04 must of had 4.10s... honostly tho, for gods sakes get a 4.0
 
  #16  
Old 08-25-2006
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Some difference:

New calibrations.
The 2001 had the restrictive aluminum intake manifold and the later models have a plastic one that is smooth and almost "ported and polished" from the factory.

I have an '02 that was stock at one time, lol. I got 4.10 gears in it and it was worth it. I made a big difference.

The 3.0 is still the most long-lived engine of the two. If you don't need the power and you are going to keep the truck the 3.0 will probably last longer with less maintenance.
 
  #17  
Old 08-25-2006
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Special
there is a difference. The 2001-2003s have 148hp and 2004+ have 154hp. But to have it pull that much harder the 04 must of had 4.10s... honostly tho, for gods sakes get a 4.0
Other way around..
 
  #18  
Old 08-25-2006
hpyford's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stuart
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahh i see. Well i am certain that my 01 3.0 had an egr seeing as the egr valve had to be replaaced twice over the two years i had the truck. i would love to have a 4.0. only problem is finding one like i want. ford didn't make many 4.0's how i want mine to be. i want anywhere from a 99-04 4.0 ohv or sohc, 5spd 2wd. yeah, extended cab would be nice too. all about the money
 
  #19  
Old 08-25-2006
Mr. Special's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bwester04
Other way around..
Wrong

http://www.internetautoguide.com/car...ger/index.html

like i said the 04+ have a massive 6 more HP lol
 
  #20  
Old 08-25-2006
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr. Special
Wrong

http://www.internetautoguide.com/car...ger/index.html

like i said the 04+ have a massive 6 more HP lol
Wrong again 04+ has 148 while the 01-03 have 154. Trust me i've owned both and I was like wtf why less hp lol.

http://www.fordvehicles.com/trucks/r...res/specs/#per
 
  #21  
Old 08-26-2006
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like the 04+ lost a bit of torque as well.. last i read my 2000 FFV 3.0L was like 152hp/185lb-ft, i thought that '02+ composite intake manifold was 'less restrictive..? i guess they played around with the exhaust and intake systems, for the worst.
 
  #22  
Old 08-26-2006
Mr. Special's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mmm i still call bs on all them then... cuz from everysite i'e seen the 03s have 148 and 04s have 154... but honsotly **** it; the 3.0 blows ***** reguardless. and the fact of the matter remains that i would never buy another ranger unless it had the 4.0 in it, [Cleve]keep searching till you find one you can afford
 
  #23  
Old 08-26-2006
hpyford's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stuart
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, that's more than likely what i'll do. the only part i dread is driving a 1986 f150 300ci 4speed with a flat bed to school everyday until then. seeing as i don't have a license at the moment. i'll get it back come thursday when i go to court. it's hard to find a 4.0 supercab 00+ for 9750 or less. oh well. we'll see. i guess i'll just have to see what i can find
 
  #24  
Old 08-27-2006
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr. Special
mmm i still call bs on all them then... cuz from everysite i'e seen the 03s have 148 and 04s have 154... but honsotly **** it; the 3.0 blows ***** reguardless. and the fact of the matter remains that i would never buy another ranger unless it had the 4.0 in it, [Cleve]keep searching till you find one you can afford
I posted from fords actual site which shows the 07 with 148hp which has been the same since 04.

I love my little 3.0 it does its job and still gets decent gas mileage(I use it to deliver pizza's)

Did you ever get a programmer for yours? If not it would be well worth it.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jfink
General Technical & Electrical
2
11-23-2010 07:42 PM
David N
Drivetrain Tech
12
01-14-2010 10:12 AM
INT3RC3PTOR
Drivetrain Tech
13
08-21-2007 06:31 PM
UNCCRang49
Drivetrain Tech
16
02-27-2007 03:43 PM
texasfan1000
Drivetrain Tech
11
09-24-2006 06:55 PM



Quick Reply: dif. between 01 3.0 and 04 3.0



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM.