2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

K&N intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-27-2008
texasfan1000's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
K&N intake

I was offered a K$N intake for my truck for free. My question is Ive heard that sometimes they mess up your MAF. What are the chances. Ive never owned one and have no idea what the upkeep is on them. any input would be nice.
 
  #2  
Old 10-27-2008
Alon's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,555
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
upkeep is clean them when they are dirty, just buy a cleaning kit and follow the instructions. Don't over oil the filter and you'll be fine, but if it is running weird, all it takes is cleaning the MAF with some electrical cleaner and you're fine.

People that have problems with their MAF getting oiled is usually a self inflicted problem
 
  #3  
Old 10-27-2008
t3ob's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
  #4  
Old 10-28-2008
Takeda's Avatar
Level I Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
The K&N will pass more dirt (and oil) than the OEM paper filter, and can gum up your IAC valve, throttle body, AND MAF sensor. And since there is no
performance advantage, why would you want to dump dirt into your engine?
In addition to that, it pulls in HOT air, where the OEM setup is a true CAI.

Here is a post from Rich (wydopnthrtl), and he is a aftermarket intake "FAN":

I'm a big fan of aftermarket intake kits. (have one on my Ranger) But only because of high rpm power increases. If your not interested in 5000+ rpms.. don't waste your money.

You won't see a MPG increase as compaired to a properly working OEM setup.
You will *likely* increase the amount of grit entering the intake.
You very well might have the warrenty denied.
And your pretty much waisting money for a daily driver.



And check out this recent thread on K&N intakes:

https://www.ranger-forums.com/forum2...ad.php?t=73737
 

Last edited by Takeda; 10-28-2008 at 04:52 AM.
  #5  
Old 10-28-2008
WowMike2001's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stevenson, WA
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I have been running a cone K&N FIPK II for a year and then some now; never ever had a problem.. just do the standard upkeep.. clean yoru maf every now and then, and the filter as well.. just like you would do normally with a paper filter.
 
  #6  
Old 10-28-2008
Takeda's Avatar
Level I Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by WowMike2001
I have been running a cone K&N FIPK II for a year and then some now; never ever had a problem.. just do the standard upkeep.. clean yoru maf every now and then, and the filter as well.. just like you would do normally with a paper filter.
My 1999 is getting ready to turn 160K miles, and I've only used Purolator, or Motorcraft OEM filters, and I've never had to clean my MAF sensor, IAC valve, or throttle body.
 
  #8  
Old 10-28-2008
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Bob throws in little things which are simply false (aka "lies"). A properly oiled filter will not "gum up" the parts. They do allow more grit to get by.. but it's not enough to hurt the motor within 150k miles IMO.

He has quoted me properly but throws in these little lies to make his point of staying stock seem *credible*.
Unless your at high rpms quite often.. you won't gain anything. But if you do like to get it into the 4000+ rpm area? Then it most definately improves power. I even datalogged this to prove it.

Rich
 
  #9  
Old 10-28-2008
Takeda's Avatar
Level I Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by wydopnthrtl
Then it most definately improves power. I even datalogged this to prove it.

Rich
This is the lie! The tuner method you used to dalalog has been PROVEN

to be VERY INACCURATE!!!

And if it didn't gum things up, why do you have to clean your MAF sensor and throttle body so often? "grit" should not stick to the MAF sensor, or throttle body!!!

Talk about lies, one time you post 5000+ RPMs, and now it's 4000+ RPMS, which is it?
 

Last edited by Takeda; 10-28-2008 at 08:09 AM.
  #10  
Old 10-28-2008
Takeda's Avatar
Level I Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by wydopnthrtl
Bob throws in little things which are simply false (aka "lies"). A properly oiled filter will not "gum up" the parts. They do allow more grit to get by.. but it's not enough to hurt the motor within 150k miles IMO.

He has quoted me properly but throws in these little lies to make his point of staying stock seem *credible*.
Unless your at high rpms quite often.. you won't gain anything. But if you do like to get it into the 4000+ rpm area? Then it most definately improves power. I even datalogged this to prove it.

Rich

Way to go Rich, you started the mess again by calling me a liar!!!!!
 
  #11  
Old 10-28-2008
Alon's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,555
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Takeda
Way to go Rich, you started the mess again by calling me a liar!!!!!
He's right.
 
  #13  
Old 10-28-2008
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Listen to people that have actual experience with these products.

I have had K&N on four different cars with no problem. The twin turbos on my RX7 never pulled oil from the K&N filters even when running 14 PSI.
 
  #14  
Old 10-29-2008
jtfoxman's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Poconos
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You will have no problems unless you do not care for it correctly. Had mine for 8 years and never had a problem. Paper filter works well also I just prefer the K&N.
 
  #15  
Old 10-30-2008
bidness's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bladenboro, NC
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've used K & N filters since 1988. 1st was on a 1984 Mazda B2000 with a weber carb. Sold that truck with 150000 miles( family got bigger.) 2nd truck 91 nissan hardbody , sold that one after 175000 miles, now have 2 rangers with k & n filters. Never had the 1st moments problem related to the K & N. I did compression checks on the mazda and Nissan , both were well with in tolerance. I inspect my filters every 2 months or so clean as them as needed.
 
  #16  
Old 11-02-2008
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: phoenix AZ
Posts: 3,040
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Harley Davidson puts K&Ns on for you. Scream'in Eagle replacement air cleaner.
 
  #17  
Old 11-08-2008
rybread5520's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Naples, Fl
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a k & n filter. No problems with it. Over 25,000 miles on it. Had one in my mustang before selling it. If you are the type of person to do routine maintenance like me and I am sure many others in here. Cleaning things like the maf or throttle body are on my occasional list of thinggs to clean. With or without a k & n. I always like to keep this as clean as possible. If I have the hood popped for one thing. It doesnt take long to clean a few more things around the engine bay. Plus they do flow better than stock. So technically over a long period of time. Many many miles, it will benefit you in the long run. Saving you the price of changing the stock filters plus gas. Just matters how much you like to work on and clean your truck.
 
  #18  
Old 11-08-2008
LuckyRanger13's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Santa Fe, TN
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Avoid over oiling and you should be fine. I personally don't recommend using the open K&N air intakes but if you do just avoid over-oiling and you'll be ok.

Design and intention of the product is excellent, just not personally sure about the open end in a engine bay.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boyd_835
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
9
03-26-2014 10:31 PM
fordboston
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
6
01-25-2010 09:37 PM
Toreador4x4
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
8
07-16-2009 09:34 PM



Quick Reply: K&N intake



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 PM.