2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

4 cyl or 6cyl??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-10-2013
nalbrecht13's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4 cyl or 6cyl??

I'm looking into buying a ranger, because I want a truck and respectable gas mileage. I am currently looking at a 1997 Ranger XLT 2.3L stick and a 1998 Extended Cab ranger with the 3.0L V6 automatic. Any suggestions? Or other model??
 
  #2  
Old 09-10-2013
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
If you want a truck with respectable mileage the only option you really have is the 4 cylinder, more specifically the 2.3 Duratech in the later model Rangers. The older 2.3 and 2.5 Lima's get only marginally ok mileage for a 4 banger.
 
  #3  
Old 09-11-2013
nalbrecht13's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So none of the older ones are any good for gas mileage? Anyone know how long these engines run? I'm kind of on a tight budget as I'm in college and just trying to trade my car for a 4x4. I've been looking at everything under 3000. So I don't know if i could find a newer one cheap enough.
 
  #4  
Old 09-11-2013
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by nalbrecht13
So none of the older ones are any good for gas mileage? Anyone know how long these engines run? I'm kind of on a tight budget as I'm in college and just trying to trade my car for a 4x4. I've been looking at everything under 3000. So I don't know if i could find a newer one cheap enough.
Well the older 4 bangers are still better than the V6's mileage wise but its really marginal unless you limit yourself to a standard cab, 2wd manual. Plus getting a 4x4 with a 4 banger is very hard to do, they stopped doing a 4 banger/ 4x4 combo around 1993 if Im not mistaken. Any of the engines you can get in a ranger from about the early 90's on will be very reliable though, they can all run for a very long time if kept up on.
 
  #5  
Old 09-11-2013
djfllmn's Avatar
Ford parts guy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 6,013
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by nalbrecht13
So none of the older ones are any good for gas mileage? Anyone know how long these engines run? I'm kind of on a tight budget as I'm in college and just trying to trade my car for a 4x4. I've been looking at everything under 3000. So I don't know if i could find a newer one cheap enough.
No ranger is good for gas mileage...they get fullsize mpg..and if you're in college keep the car until you get out
 
  #6  
Old 09-11-2013
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by djfllmn
No ranger is good for gas mileage...they get fullsize mpg..and if you're in college keep the car until you get out
This isnt entirely true. A newer duratech 2wd standard cab can pull down high 20's for mileage.
 
  #7  
Old 09-11-2013
djfllmn's Avatar
Ford parts guy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 6,013
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
Let me rephrase that...v6 rangers get fullsize mpg
 
  #8  
Old 09-11-2013
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
my 4.0 would get 18-19 when it was stock.

either way my old 1992 4cyl 2.3 would get high 20s easy. Depends on your commute and driving habits usually.
 
  #9  
Old 09-11-2013
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
There is a truck i nthe classifieds that is for sale, 1993 for 1800. 4cyl
 
  #10  
Old 09-11-2013
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
  #11  
Old 09-11-2013
nalbrecht13's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So it's a lie then when people say they are getting 27 mpg? It seemed like a lot of people said that.
 
  #12  
Old 09-11-2013
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by nalbrecht13
So it's a lie then when people say they are getting 27 mpg? It seemed like a lot of people said that.
Depends on what they are driving. If its got a V6 in it they are feeding you a line of BS
 
  #13  
Old 09-12-2013
.Rick's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Olu
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nalbrecht13
So it's a lie then when people say they are getting 27 mpg? It seemed like a lot of people said that.
The best I have ever tested is a little over 26 MPG and that is about half highway half city.

I average 24-25.

The worst I have ever got was 19.

This is with the truck in the ad above.

I was consistently getting 21 MPG until I took out the air cleaner silencer tube and found out the exhaust was plugged.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pbcanney
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
10
03-20-2018 04:53 PM
CadiLLacPimPin
Drivetrain Tech
15
08-14-2014 08:26 PM
dixie_boysles
SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines
3
01-30-2010 06:20 PM
blkrang
Drivetrain Tech
7
12-24-2007 11:37 AM
Ranger00
General Ford Ranger Discussion
28
01-05-2007 04:22 PM



Quick Reply: 4 cyl or 6cyl??



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 PM.