2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

weight in bed = why is this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2007
  #1  
Jeremy102579's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: North Tonawanda, NY
weight in bed = why is this?

Ok, we all know 3.0's are slow as ever.

I have noticed the few times i have loaded the bed up with weight, firewood or whatever.....the truck seems to drive better and the acceleration seems to be better.

is it just me or is there something about doing this that helps?

1994 supercab 3.0 xl stick 4x4 with 165,000 miles
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2007
  #2  
Marcaronio's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 560
Likes: 1
From: Spring Hill, FL
Trucks are designed to have weight in the bed therefore the rear suspension usually functions better when hauling a load. By better I mean it hops around less. I'm not sure about acceleration being better though. If anything I would think it would get worse with more weight having to be pushed around. The only thing I can think is maybe you would get better traction allowing you to take off faster.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2007
  #3  
04BlackFX4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
From: Maine
The more weight in the back makes the tires grab the ground better, which is traction. its like for 2wd's, if you put some heavy stuff in the back its going to grab the ground better and get you out of most situations, such as snow.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2007
  #4  
telemaster1952's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
From: Nowhere
mine performed the same if not better when hauling logs/cement/anything else as it did when it was empty
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2007
  #5  
0sixsport's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: Logan, Utah
So traction bars would give the same effect right?
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2007
  #6  
gearhead299's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Pennington, NJ
mine is definetly slower with a lot of weight in the bed, not by much but is certainly doesn't get faster, traction has never been much of an issue for me, the only time my truck broke lose taking off was on rainy day when i had 215/75s on it, i will say that back bounces around less with some extra weight in it
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2007
  #7  
Boomdock's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Washington, IA
A smoother ride and that's it. SLOWER acceleration when it's a heavy load.
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2007
  #8  
shadow905's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 0
From: Boerne, TX
Originally Posted by Boomdock
A smoother ride and that's it. SLOWER acceleration when it's a heavy load.

haha....same here. i have slow and slower. not fast at all. and with a load of dirt or something....i might as well forget it
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FMD
General Ford Ranger Discussion
18
Sep 8, 2019 03:16 PM
Fenech627
General Ford Ranger Discussion
42
Jan 2, 2008 03:57 PM
firstranger
General Ford Ranger Discussion
10
Jul 22, 2007 12:30 PM
2XRAD Ranger
New Ideas
16
Jan 10, 2007 04:46 PM
Jeremy102579
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
25
Nov 27, 2006 06:41 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 AM.