4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Does adding headers require a re-tune?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2019
  #1  
rskarl's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Highlands Ranch
Does adding headers require a re-tune?

Hello - my son and I want to put headers on his 2003 Ford Ranger FX4 Level II - would doing so require us to change the truck's tune?
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2019
  #2  
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 30,635
Likes: 2,952
From: Vancouver, BC
No.

Exhaust manifolds used scavenged power, free extra power
The factory exhaust manifolds are tuned to get best added power in mid RPM band

Most "headers" are turned for low RPM added power, so you lose the mid-range power, Racing headers are tuned for high-band extra power
So there are 3 off-the -shelf "headers"
Low-RPM band << most popular to change to
Mid-RPM band << stock Ranger manifolds
High-RPM band <<need to keep RPMs above 4,000 to make use of these

You can get free extra power from one band only


The science for it is complicated but there is a simple way to understand it
Anytime you have a high pressure and speed gas(exhaust) dump into a larger pipe you get a pressure DROP, a suction
The length and diameter of a smaller tube and the diameter of the larger tube are what decides when you get the higher suction/pressure drop, the RPM band

In a V6 you have 3 smaller tubes dumping into one larger tube
The size of the smaller tube is what creates the Velocity/speed and pressure of the exhaust when it hits the larger tube, this cause a pressure drop in the other 2 smaller exhaust tubes
So when the exhaust valve opens the exhaust is PULLED out which leaves more power on the piston and crank because it doesn't have to PUSH it out as much.

And thats scavenged power, so nothing to do with the air/fuel or spark timing tuning, so you are good to go
Headers you use need to be for 4.0l SOHC engine of course



Scavenged power is also where the MYTH of back pressure comes from, lol.
Car makers have been using scavenging exhaust manifolds since the 50s/60s

And some people have the thought that exhaust systems in vehicles are restrictive in some manner, on 2-stoke engines yes, they have to be, lol, but never on a 4-stoke engine, no car maker would do that on purpose.
So they would install "free flow" exhaust system, big pipes on the heads and bigger pipes to the back
Then go for a drive....................
"HEY......WTF!!!!..........I LOST POWER????"
"this engine must need back pressure".......................LMAO on that one every time

They lost the scavenged power the factory manifold provided, they lost the lower pressure so pistons had to PUSH exhaust out on every exhaust stroke
 

Last edited by RonD; Aug 13, 2019 at 07:14 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2019
  #3  
rskarl's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Highlands Ranch
Dang - you're smart! Thank you for going above and beyond in your reply - I definitely learned. So, basically, one needs to chose between more power at low RPM, mid RPM or high RPM. From the factory the power, via the stock manifold, is in the mid RPM band and if we switch to headers we'd be moving the power to the low RPM band - more power off the line essentially (as long as we don't accidentally install racing headers).

Is that why headers are so popular - more power off the line?

This is for my son and since he's 17 years old he mostly wants to burn rubber and make noise - I assume that can be somewhat accomplished with the installation of headers targeted for the low RPM band?

Thanks again for the help - I really appreciate it!

One other question - the addition of a cold air intake - would that require modifying the 'tune' since it'll possibly monkey with the air/fuel mix?
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2019
  #4  
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 30,635
Likes: 2,952
From: Vancouver, BC
Yes, most want better off the line power so thats the most common header choice

All Rangers with fuel injection came with cold air intakes(CAI), since 1986
You can look at the air filter box and you will see the air tube that runs to the rad support, it pulls in cooler air from behind the grill instead of warmer air in the engine bay

No changes to engine computer(PCM) would be needed if you modified this
There are two sensors that will report changes to the PCM if you do
MAF(mass air flow) sensor reports the WEIGHT of the incoming air
IAT(intake air temp) sensor reports the air temp

These sensors will compensate for your changes to intake air system, for better or worse.............some CAI systems actually make for less power



Gasoline air:fuel ratio is 14.7:1, this is a WEIGHT ratio, not volume, this is why "pre-vaporizers" AND 200mpg Carburetors were/are hooey
14.7 POUNDS of air to 1 POUND of gasoline
14.7grams of air to 1 gram of gasoline
(laws of physics are reliable even if they suck, lol)

So air weight is very important, and it changes from sea level to 5,000ft elevation, and it also changes by temperature, i.e. "hot air rises" why?, because it is LIGHTER than colder air.
Gasoline's weight changes very little warm or cold

The point of a Cold Air Intake is to take advantage of its heavier weight, computer can add more gasoline to release more energy if air is heavier
This is why engines are "peppier" in the winter, colder air, and why MPG goes down, lol, no its not all because of the added ethanol in winter fuel


And just as a heads up, your son is running a 4.0l SOHC engine, it has 9.7:1 compression ratio, which means it will ping/knock on Regular gasoline(87 octane), so Ford installed a Knock sensor to allow it to run on 87 octane without pinging/knocking, but this also reduces power
For best power 91 octane or 93 octane would make a difference, but also make a big dent in the wallet, lol
 

Last edited by RonD; Aug 14, 2019 at 01:01 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2011rngrguy
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
2
Nov 25, 2017 12:32 PM
Michael weston
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
10
Jan 6, 2017 08:25 AM
gurvirsidhu91
General Ford Ranger Discussion
2
Feb 22, 2016 11:40 AM
Bazman2008Ranger
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
3
Jan 19, 2015 02:18 PM
RaNgEr3.0v6
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
28
Oct 17, 2014 09:20 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.