4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2015
  #1  
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: PA
Headers

I have an exhaust leak I have been trying to fix forever.

It is the passenger side where the y-pipe meets the manifold.

I am thinking the manifold is no longer round where the y-pip seals it.

If I am going to replace it, I might as well upgrade.

Anyone have any input on the Stainless JBA shorty headers

2004 4.0 5 speed
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2015
  #2  
redranger04g's Avatar
Member

iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Placentia, CA
RonD will probably chime in a little later with a more detailed analysis. But basically headers are not an "upgrade", they don't increase power they just move the powerband to a different RPM range.

However, you will definitely be upgrading the finish on you headers. I think some stainless JBA headers would look good under the hood, and from what I have seen most people have been very happy with the JBA headers. Most reviews say they are not worth the money, but if you already have to replace them then IMO you should get the JBA headers.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2015
  #3  
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by redranger04g
RonD will probably chime in a little later with a more detailed analysis. But basically headers are not an "upgrade", they don't increase power they just move the powerband to a different RPM range.

However, you will definitely be upgrading the finish on you headers. I think some stainless JBA headers would look good under the hood, and from what I have seen most people have been very happy with the JBA headers. Most reviews say they are not worth the money, but if you already have to replace them then IMO you should get the JBA headers.


Thanks for the input. JBA was stating a 16hp increase at the same 4872 RPM

As for looks... This truck is used and abused, not polished and pushed so I could care less
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2015
  #4  
redranger04g's Avatar
Member

iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Placentia, CA
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad
Thanks for the input. JBA was stating a 16hp increase at the same 4872 RPM

As for looks... This truck is used and abused, not polished and pushed so I could care less
I haven't researched this stuff for a long time, but I am pretty sure that the 16 hp number you are quoting is JBA's claim when you add their headers, exhaust and ignition wires. Theoretically if you are gaining 16 hp at 4872 RPM, then you are losing hp elsewhere. Just keep in mind there is no way you will gain 16 hp throughout the powerband.

IMO they ARE an upgrade over stock and I would get them if I was in your situation. Just trying to make sure you understand the facts.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2015
  #5  
RLong31's Avatar
The Ban Hammer
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 2
From: Monrovia, IN
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad
Thanks for the input. JBA was stating a 16hp increase at the same 4872 RPM

As for looks... This truck is used and abused, not polished and pushed so I could care less
Think about that for a second.. 4872 RPM.. when are you ever at that RPM range unless maybe WOT?
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2015
  #6  
bravetitan24's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 3
From: Haughton, LA
Yeah, you're ******* the hell out of it at 4872 RPM
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2015
  #7  
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: PA
Some reading for you guys
http://www.jbaheaders.com/assets/dyno/04rangerdyno.jpg
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2015
  #8  
redranger04g's Avatar
Member

iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Placentia, CA
Like I said, those numbers are for headers, exhaust and ignition wires. Still, you can see you are losing low end power. How many times are you at 4872? The JBA dyno clearly shows that stock has more power at 2200 rpm. Guess what rpm you usually cruise at at 65 mph? Ford isn't dumb, they tune their engines/exhaust to get the most fuel efficient numbers at the EPA mandated mph.

Also, keep in mind that was a study published by JBA, not a third party.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2015
  #9  
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: PA
And that is why I asked. The chart shows at 2400+ the headers surpass the stock setup.


I already have a full stainless exhaust since mine rotted off 2 years ago and I was also looking at wires since mine now have 185k on them
 

Last edited by Diesel_Brad; Feb 22, 2015 at 02:48 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2015
  #10  
redranger04g's Avatar
Member

iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Placentia, CA
Got it. Well yeah you should get them, the 4.0 loves those higher RPMs
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sawred
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
33
Jul 22, 2009 07:07 AM
zabeard
General Ford Ranger Discussion
42
Aug 5, 2005 03:42 PM
V8 Level II
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
19
May 7, 2005 12:24 AM
james13f
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
11
Mar 28, 2005 04:15 AM
bjv11
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
4
Jun 11, 2004 01:14 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 AM.