4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2007
  #1  
FX403/STX96's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: MI
Icon5 Headers

Who out there has headers on an 01+ and if you do did you run true dual exhaust with the OEMl cats? Or how did you run it? Whats works the best and what should I avoid?
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007
  #2  
WowMike2001's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 4
From: Stevenson, WA
I would stick with a single to dual or a single/single exhaust, our engine isnt quite buff enough to run a true dual without losing some much needed back pressure... perhaps some of thsoe that are running a supercharger among other mods.. a true dual would be a nice setup to put in.. you jsut need the room to do it as well, and thats really tough to do considering you need a cat on each run.. and we ont have much room down tehre to do it.. unless yoru runnign a decent lift on yoru truck :-)
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007
  #3  
Urandaman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: wher ever uncle sam wants
i have jba headers(got pics of the install on a different computer, ill get around to emailing them to myself one day)
all the rest of the exhaust is stock
id stick with single in single out style cat back.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007
  #4  
brad@JBAHEADERS's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: La Jolla
we have actually tested true duals on these and its really not worth it, a good set of headers with a singe in/out is really the best way
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2007
  #5  
jimmclrk1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Is there a difference in the 4.0 in the Ranger and the 3.8 in the v6 Mustangs that makes the Mustang engine more agreeable with a true dual set-up? I know several v6 Mustang owners with true dual set-ups, and it has never made sense to me.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2007
  #6  
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2
From: Round Rock, Tx
^they sound like crap too (IMO). My sister had an '02 V6 stang with true duals and it had a nasty sound (and not in a good way) when you got the RPMs up there..
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007
  #8  
karrbass4life's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by bwester04
^they sound like crap too (IMO). My sister had an '02 V6 stang with true duals and it had a nasty sound (and not in a good way) when you got the RPMs up there..
That weed eater with a borla exhaust sound?

Originally Posted by WowMike2001
I would stick with a single to dual or a single/single exhaust, our engine isnt quite buff enough to run a true dual without losing some much needed back pressure... perhaps some of thsoe that are running a supercharger among other mods.. a true dual would be a nice setup to put in.. you jsut need the room to do it as well, and thats really tough to do considering you need a cat on each run.. and we ont have much room down tehre to do it.. unless yoru runnign a decent lift on yoru truck :-)
The gas tank is in the way too isnt it?
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007
  #9  
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2
From: Round Rock, Tx
worse... flowmasters, so its raspy at the higher rpms.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008
  #10  
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 9
From: Ohio
From a TQ curve standpoint for a 4x4. True duals on a short stroke motor is not a smart move. Most 4x4 guys are interesting in low to mid rpm TQ. Not 5000+ rpms.

A better way might be to extrude hone (or hand port) your existing manifolds and get a set of high flow contertors with a 2.5" single mid pipe. After the muffler it won't matter much what you do.

Rich
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sawred
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
33
Jul 22, 2009 07:07 AM
zabeard
General Ford Ranger Discussion
42
Aug 5, 2005 03:42 PM
V8 Level II
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
19
May 7, 2005 12:24 AM
james13f
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
11
Mar 28, 2005 04:15 AM
bjv11
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
4
Jun 11, 2004 01:14 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 PM.