4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Larger MAF?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-05-2009
famousranger13's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Rockledge,Fl
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Larger MAF?

I know their out there. What is a brand? I want a lil more hp. I know tb spacer or tb's help with this. I don't want any major surgery. Something simple to install. Any Help on this one?
 
  #2  
Old 05-05-2009
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It wont help on a stock truck man. But if you really want one then: http://www.zabteck.com/maf.htm
 
  #3  
Old 05-05-2009
famousranger13's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Rockledge,Fl
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
k thanks oh well 4.0 will have to stay slow...
 
  #4  
Old 05-16-2009
morris's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Detroit.
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
how would you get that to work? i guess i'm asking what other mods would a guy have to do to get power out of that zabtech unit?
 
  #5  
Old 05-17-2009
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by morris
how would you get that to work? i guess i'm asking what other mods would a guy have to do to get power out of that zabtech unit?

Higher rpms on a stock motor. But the stock cams / heads fall off about 5700rpms, and the bottom end balance gets dirty up over 5800rpms.. so there is really no point. If you had a balanced bottom end and ported head (w/cams) then IMO it **might** be worth it.

There is a huge misconception about the MAF meter. Truth is the stock one can be made bigger by modifying the sensors physical crossection. That's the first route I'd take. (you'll have to re-map the transfer function)
Then I'd want to see 5V with at least 500rpms to go. Then and only then would I step up to a aftermarket MAF.

Swaping the MAF does not add power. Most likely these aftermarket MAF's transfer function is skewed and leaning out the A/F. That is most likely where the "perception" of a power increase is coming from.

On my ranger the 1-2 shift is at 5800 and I'm no where near maxing out the stock MAF. Even in below freezing (high DA) weather.

If you want real power increases.. go with a larger exhaust system first.

Rich
 
  #6  
Old 05-17-2009
morris's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Detroit.
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
you shift at 5800? wow! i shift around 2500 for all shifts from 1-3. then 4 and 5 i'm closer to 3k or 3500
 
  #7  
Old 05-18-2009
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by morris
you shift at 5800? wow! i shift around 2500 for all shifts from 1-3. then 4 and 5 i'm closer to 3k or 3500
If your only concerned about low rpms.. then you'll never.. ever... have the need of a MAF that can flow more than the stock one.


Guys.. take the time to understand what a MAF does before assuming an aftermarket one will gain you something.

Regards, Rich
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
optikal illushun
General Ford Ranger Discussion
20
10-17-2005 02:09 PM
crawly1025
Suspension Tech
36
07-11-2005 03:55 PM
jtslmn720
Suspension Tech
13
03-14-2005 08:51 AM
Rand
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
1
11-26-2004 10:52 AM
Ranger556kmr
General Ford Ranger Discussion
6
07-07-2004 08:55 AM



Quick Reply: Larger MAF?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.