4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Mac intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2010
  #1  
Villen's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Mac intake

Someone on here was selling a mac intake for the 4.0. Was just wondering how this intake performs?

Or are there better intakes around? I see alot of people running the k&n intakes as well.

Just thought I would check cause I haven't heard much about Mac...
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2010
  #2  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Of all the intakes available for the SOHC, the Mac intake is known to be the best one out there. Save for the Volant.

If you're interested, I've got a mac intake for sale too.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2010
  #3  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010
  #4  
Villen's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Does anyone have a picture of either kit installed?
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010
  #5  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
i have a volant installed.. sorry to say it.. an intake is mental ************.. your not going to gain noticeable hp at all. you may see a slight .5mpg increase thats about it.

oh my volant is For sale as well.
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010
  #6  
Rolldogg's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 5
From: Ottawa, Ontario
I have a MAC cone filter on the stock intake tube. Makes a great woosh noise on hard acceleration....LOL To really see performance gains, a complete intake kit along with an aftermarket cat back exhaust system would be needed.
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010
  #7  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by Rolldogg
I have a MAC cone filter on the stock intake tube. Makes a great woosh noise on hard acceleration....LOL To really see performance gains, a complete intake kit along with an aftermarket cat back exhaust system would be needed.
And a tune, and head work...
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010
  #8  
Rolldogg's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 5
From: Ottawa, Ontario
exactly.....

On a DD with no modifications.......it really does nothing for you. I got mine for cheap, and it's more of a mod list check more then anything....LOL
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2010
  #9  
crawly1025's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
From: Steubenville Ohio
Have a MAC but took it off. It was really good at sucking large amounts of hot air from the engine compartment. Not sure if I'm going to put it back in or not. If you do the air silencer mod to the factory airbox, you'll get the same sound when you hit the gas. I'm currently running a Fram Airhog filter and the stock box with the silencer mod....intake air temps have gone way down.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010
  #10  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Originally Posted by Jp7
And a tune, and head work...
so what he is saying is.. thats its pointless to do on our trucks.. and we are better of making power on something meant to go fast.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010
  #11  
gts007's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 2
From: 559, CA
Originally Posted by crawly1025
Have a MAC but took it off. It was really good at sucking large amounts of hot air from the engine compartment. Not sure if I'm going to put it back in or not. If you do the air silencer mod to the factory airbox, you'll get the same sound when you hit the gas. I'm currently running a Fram Airhog filter and the stock box with the silencer mod....intake air temps have gone way down.
I totally believe it, but how did you determine the air temperature ?
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010
  #12  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
The key is having a closed airbox. That's it. I'm running a Thunderbolt box w/ a cone filter inside and a custom steel tube going to my throttle body. I'm regularly seeing cold air(colder than ambient temp) via my scangauge. Stock intake I was seeing higher numbers with temps being hotter than outside air, even at 70mph. Not to mention my truck felt like it was choking especially after the Tbolt box install w/ the stock tube. No hard evidence to back myself up, just I've seen the numbers from the PCM.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010
  #13  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by Fx4wannabe01
The key is having a closed airbox. That's it. I'm running a Thunderbolt box w/ a cone filter inside and a custom steel tube going to my throttle body. I'm regularly seeing cold air(colder than ambient temp) via my scangauge. Stock intake I was seeing higher numbers with temps being hotter than outside air, even at 70mph. Not to mention my truck felt like it was choking especially after the Tbolt box install w/ the stock tube. No hard evidence to back myself up, just I've seen the numbers from the PCM.
Colder than ambient is physically impossible. Heat-transfer 101. Your MAF is reading temperature slightly off.

In saying this, its like measuring horsepower. My car on a DD Dyno measures 580-610whp, same car with same tune measures 650-680whp on a DJ Dyno. MAF log comparisons are a way of measuring improvement, not exact values.
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010
  #14  
gts007's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 2
From: 559, CA
Yeah I think he means same as ambient. colder than ambient isn't possible unless hes got some kind of refrigeration setup at his air filter lol
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2010
  #15  
crawly1025's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
From: Steubenville Ohio
Originally Posted by gts007
I totally believe it, but how did you determine the air temperature ?
I have a Scangauge hooked up to check the intake temps. I'm sure it's not exact, but there was a major difference between the open filter and the stock box. The reality is, while the 4.0L is, as far as I'm concerned, a better than average powerplant, the intake for me was pointless when I had the trailer hooked up or was driving through a field to get to a fishing spot. The MAC pulled air like crazy, but I doubt it made any power difference and all the air it pulled was hot engine air.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2010
  #16  
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: MI
My MAC intake on the 4.0L SOHC seemed to help, espesically with my high flow exhaust. I'm sure with a tuner it would be even better.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pushdeck
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
3
Mar 15, 2007 10:00 PM
crawly1025
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
15
May 23, 2006 03:26 PM
Johns777
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
11
Mar 22, 2006 09:21 PM
RicksTJR
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
7
Mar 21, 2006 06:27 AM
FORZDA
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
8
Jun 10, 2005 02:42 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 PM.