4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Ranger 4.0 vs Dakota 318 V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-25-2007
ReconRanger03's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Alamos
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ranger 4.0 vs Dakota 318 V8

anybody raced one or knows who would win?
 
  #2  
Old 10-25-2007
jdm03edge's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cleburne, Texas
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dakota 318 v8
 
  #3  
Old 10-26-2007
bryce-man's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: beach cities,CA
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah hands donw 318 v8 over the 4L v6 ...

heres yer sign!
 
  #4  
Old 10-26-2007
Matt3203's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: phenix city, alabama
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what bout the 3.9 dakota
 
  #5  
Old 10-26-2007
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boring, Oregon
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
yea...I stomp my buddies 3.8 dakota. So yes....a 4.0 ranger beats a 3.8 or whatever dakota. 5.2, I don't know.

But, a 4.0 has NO CHANCE w/ a 5.9 R/T Dakota.
 
  #6  
Old 10-26-2007
Urandaman's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: wher ever uncle sam wants
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4.0 keeps up with 5.3 chevy single cab from a 45 roll its dead even til about 65-70 and then the chevy starts pullin haha.

the 318 is the 5.2 correct? id say it could be a close race til higher speeds when teh 4.0 starts to top out
 
  #7  
Old 10-26-2007
karrbass4life's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Last time I checked the ranger wasn't a performance truck at all. Use this rule.
V8 in a mini = pwnage
V6 in a mini = win, unless new toyota
v8 fulsized truck = idk i've seen losses and wins
Srt 10 = crack is bad
 
  #8  
Old 10-26-2007
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
My 3.0 can take my dads 3.9, I need to get someone else to drive the Dakota tho and actually race em. My truck feels a heck of a lot faster then the Dakota tho, i'll find out next weekend.
 
  #9  
Old 10-26-2007
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
A few years in a row we Michigan Lightning Owners club had track days where we shared the day/event with the Dakota club.

The V8 versions in mostly stock trim run mid to low 15s. The bolt on guys could click off mid to high 14s.
So even my fairly well "bolt on" modified ranger would have a tough time out running a 2wd V8 version.
I **think** the V6 Dakotas ran high 15s if memory servs me right?

Rich
 
  #10  
Old 10-26-2007
Cody_288's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oil City, PA, Pittsfield, PA
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I raced a 99 single cab 3.9 5 speed dakota with dual exhaust when I had 31x10.50s and walked him like a dog from a dig.

My '03 Suzuki Z400 (quad) destroyed the same dakota from a dig but I got caught up with and passed when he got up to approximately 90mph.
 
  #12  
Old 10-26-2007
Cody_288's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oil City, PA, Pittsfield, PA
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D.
I think its possible .
hahaha... Well yours is a little ridiculously fast...
 
  #14  
Old 10-26-2007
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boring, Oregon
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
come on D, your truck is not "normal". I'm thinking stock vs. stock. Of course it may be possible. der.
 
  #15  
Old 10-26-2007
mj550's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh those 5.2s and 5.9s arent that fast, heck a friend of mine has a r/t that runs 15s. Heck, the 4.7L one is a different story....
 
  #16  
Old 10-26-2007
Cody_288's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oil City, PA, Pittsfield, PA
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D.
Not at all. 13-14second times arent ' fast '.. well.. to me its not fast... or ' fast enough ' :)
Well for a 4.0 Ranger, it is ridiculously fast.
 
  #17  
Old 10-27-2007
mj550's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cody_288
Well for a 4.0 Ranger, it is ridiculously fast.
Yep I agree, heck 14s I believe is mustang gt territory.
 
  #18  
Old 10-27-2007
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the 4.7 vs. the 4.0 modular?

My neighbor has a 98 Dakota, 4x4, 4.7 - he bought it used with no cats & a si/so flowmaster muffler, man does it sound nice. I'm pretty sure thats the only performance mod he has...

I wonder how good of a race it would be..
 
  #19  
Old 10-27-2007
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't think D's 4.0L is 4 liters anymore...
 
  #20  
Old 10-27-2007
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boring, Oregon
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
i don't think so either.
 
  #21  
Old 10-29-2007
Urandaman's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: wher ever uncle sam wants
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
What about the 4.7 vs. the 4.0 modular?

My neighbor has a 98 Dakota, 4x4, 4.7 - he bought it used with no cats & a si/so flowmaster muffler, man does it sound nice. I'm pretty sure thats the only performance mod he has...

I wonder how good of a race it would be..

do race and let us know :)
 
  #23  
Old 10-29-2007
ReconRanger03's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Alamos
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was just asking cause I was reading a dakota forum or something where they said the ranger was quicker even with a trailer but I guess they were talking about the v6. atleast we're better at the off roading : ) http://www.offroadrangers.com/forum/...ad.php?t=21125
 
  #24  
Old 10-29-2007
01xltranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Urandaman
do race and let us know :)
He's too much of a baby..
 
  #25  
Old 11-02-2007
demonatng's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Selah,wa
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With 4.10's and 31's I could out run my friends xcab 4x4 318 dakota with 32's up to about 60-65mph, after that it was point less. I did have a lot less miles on my rig then her too 10k vs 80k.
 


Quick Reply: Ranger 4.0 vs Dakota 318 V8



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.