Mercruiser 470 swap
#1
#4
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop...XTc4Bha4&gl=US
#5
In stock form
What about with CJ,SCJ or Police Interceptor head? It's an inline 4 cyl with a 460 head so I know it would fit between the rails.Look m up on ebay I am thinking about it,heck a stock head with Cobra Jet valves and ported exhaust would have to have a + effect.If you went with an aluminum head the weight would be minimal.Then maybe a Super Cobra Jet grind on a custom cam???? The SOHC is a "W I D E" motor and that's were the nickname EXPLODER came from the timing chain for the cams is it's weak point,
#6
A carbed 470 can easily put out 500 HP.
Been there , done that.
A 470 will turn the Ranger frame into a pretzel.
#7
AMAZING!
Thats more than a 302 or 351W or 351C in stock form all that from a "224" 3.7L" 4 cyl I GOTTA do it NOW!
#8
A 470 is not a 3.7L.
It's 470 cubic inches.
A 460 is 460 cubic inches.
They are big block engines that are large,heavy , and will twist your Ranger frame into a mass of scrap metal.
If you got the $$$$ to fab a real frame to hold it , Have at it.
To drop a 460 or 470 into a Ranger won't work.
ALL the weight is on the front , and you would go through a set of rear tires in about an hour.
Well, maybe less if you took it off idle.
#10
Sam , it appears that you need to get your engine sizes straight.
A 470 is not a 3.7L.
It's 470 cubic inches.
A 460 is 460 cubic inches.
They are big block engines that are large,heavy , and will twist your Ranger frame into a mass of scrap metal.
If you got the $$$$ to fab a real frame to hold it , Have at it.
To drop a 460 or 470 into a Ranger won't work.
ALL the weight is on the front , and you would go through a set of rear tires in about an hour.
Well, maybe less if you took it off idle.
A 470 is not a 3.7L.
It's 470 cubic inches.
A 460 is 460 cubic inches.
They are big block engines that are large,heavy , and will twist your Ranger frame into a mass of scrap metal.
If you got the $$$$ to fab a real frame to hold it , Have at it.
To drop a 460 or 470 into a Ranger won't work.
ALL the weight is on the front , and you would go through a set of rear tires in about an hour.
Well, maybe less if you took it off idle.
470 is the model number not displacement. http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/s...ght=mercruiser
#11
I do
Sam , it appears that you need to get your engine sizes straight.
A 470 is not a 3.7L.
It's 470 cubic inches.
A 460 is 460 cubic inches.
They are big block engines that are large,heavy , and will twist your Ranger frame into a mass of scrap metal.
If you got the $$$$ to fab a real frame to hold it , Have at it.
To drop a 460 or 470 into a Ranger won't work.
ALL the weight is on the front , and you would go through a set of rear tires in about an hour.
Well, maybe less if you took it off idle.
A 470 is not a 3.7L.
It's 470 cubic inches.
A 460 is 460 cubic inches.
They are big block engines that are large,heavy , and will twist your Ranger frame into a mass of scrap metal.
If you got the $$$$ to fab a real frame to hold it , Have at it.
To drop a 460 or 470 into a Ranger won't work.
ALL the weight is on the front , and you would go through a set of rear tires in about an hour.
Well, maybe less if you took it off idle.
#13
THANX!
A MERCRUISER 470 is 3.7L. IT IS HALF OF A FORD 460. It is a mercruiser 4cyl boat engine that produces 170-190hp stock.
470 is the model number not displacement. http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/s...ght=mercruiser
470 is the model number not displacement. http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/s...ght=mercruiser
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2001fordranger
Drivetrain Tech
6
03-05-2011 07:06 PM
nobb
General Ford Ranger Discussion
17
11-14-2010 08:41 PM