2.9l
#1
2.9l
I need some of your honest opinions on the 2.9L V6. Im looking at a 88 Ranger that had 54,000 original miles, 5-speed, manual transfer case and hubs. Its what Im looking for but I saw a 2.9L in a Bronco 2 warp the heads and blow the head gaskets. I know the 2.9 gets a bad rep but is it just different opinions or is this just not a reliable motor. Thanks
#2
@ 54k and the right price, I'd grab it.
Can always throw a 4.0 in it, if it ever comes to that.
Like any motor, don't ever overheat it.
Look at the pedal pads for more wear than 54k would indicate. For example, my 93 @ 135k has bare metal showing through pedal wear at one corner (wasn't MY foot). My 2000 @ 100k has barely detectable wear, mostly just imbedded grit.
Can always throw a 4.0 in it, if it ever comes to that.
Like any motor, don't ever overheat it.
Look at the pedal pads for more wear than 54k would indicate. For example, my 93 @ 135k has bare metal showing through pedal wear at one corner (wasn't MY foot). My 2000 @ 100k has barely detectable wear, mostly just imbedded grit.
#3
I need some of your honest opinions on the 2.9L V6. Im looking at a 88 Ranger that had 54,000 original miles, 5-speed, manual transfer case and hubs. Its what Im looking for but I saw a 2.9L in a Bronco 2 warp the heads and blow the head gaskets. I know the 2.9 gets a bad rep but is it just different opinions or is this just not a reliable motor. Thanks