Get your ponies back in 15 mins - Page 2 - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource

General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-21-2011
djfllmn's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: York, PA
Posts: 5,796
^correct me if im wrong but chevy used the 454 in the trucks until 99 and ford used the 460 until 98
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011
Masteratarms93's Avatar
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Goose Creek SC
Posts: 4,685
Yeah but the power was a joke. They got rid of them because they could get the same power from a small block.


The big-block was expanded again for 1970 to 454.2 cubic inches (7.4 L) with a 4.251 in (108.0 mm) bore and 4 in (100 mm) stroke. The 1970 Chevy Corvette LS5 version of this engine produced 390 hp (291 kW) and 500 lbft (680 Nm), and the LS6 engine was rated at 450 hp (340 kW). It has been suggested that the LS6 was substantially underrated and actually produced well over 500 horsepower (370 kW) as delivered from the factory, although there is no empirical evidence to support this claim. Indeed, the AHRA ASA Class record holding Chevelle LS6 for the 1970 season posted a record setting trap speed of 106.76 mph (171.81 km/h) "1970 ASA LS6 454 Records", which suggests something on the order of 370 "as installed" (SAE Net) HP for a 3,900 pounds (1,800 kg) car and driver combination.

A 465 hp (347 kW) and 490 lbft (660 Nm) version of the 454, dubbed LS7 was also designed but never went to production. However, a handful of LS7 intake manifolds were produced and sold by a few Chevy dealers as performance parts. The LS7 was later offered as a crate engine from GM and advertised at 500 hp (370 kW).

Power began falling off after 1970, with the 1971 LS5 producing 365 hp (272 kW) and 465 lbft (630 Nm), and the LS6 option coming in at 425 hp (317 kW) and 475 lbft (644 Nm). Only the LS5 remained in 1972, when SAE net power ratings and the move towards emission compliance resulted in to 270 hp (200 kW) and 390 lbft (530 Nm). The 1973 LS4 produced 275 hp (205 kW) and 390 lbft (530 Nm), with 5 hp (3.7 kW) and 10 lbft (14 Nm) gone the following year. Hardened valve seats helped allow these engines to last much longer than the earlier versions, even without the protection previously provided by lead from fuel. 1974 was the last year of the 454 in the Corvette though the Chevelle offered it in the first 1/2 of the 1975 model year. It was also available in the full size Impala/Caprice until model year 1976.

GM continued to use the 7.4 L (454 cu in) in their truck line, introducing a new Vortec 7400 version in 1996. GM also introduced the 7.4 L 454 EFI in 1990 (known as the GEN V; the previous generation was known as the Mark IV produced between 196590; the GEN prefix was used since Ford Motor Company owns the Mark V naming rights since it was used on a Lincoln automobile between 197779), which was electronically fuel injected giving more power and torque. The 454 EFI version was rated from 230 hp (170 kW) to 255 hp (190 kW) and from 385 lbft (522 Nm) to 405 lbft (549 Nm) of torque. The 7.4 L 454 EFI was found on GM 2500 and 3500 trucks throughout the early 1990s until replaced with the Vortec 7400 (GEN VI) in 1996.

In short in 1970 the 454 was 450hp, in 1972 it had 270hp (hahahaha), and in 1990 it produced 230-255hp (hahahahahhahahaha).

If 230hp is all you can get from a 454 big block then I would have phased them out to.

Thank jesus we are FINALLY starting to bring hp and trq number back to where they were in 1970. I think the current Chevy 6.?L truck engine is now at 400hp.
Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
94 starts and runs about 5 mins but dies Jfranklin SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines 1 10-03-2013 11:59 PM
5 lug ponies on a 95? RangerDanger21 Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech 4 02-19-2009 08:53 PM
get my truck back tommorow finally 2003stealthedge General Ford Ranger Discussion 12 01-09-2007 01:21 AM
what new head unit to get? "Gimmie some feed back" fletch12518 Audio & Video Tech 32 01-21-2006 10:03 AM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.