General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Looks like Ford is finally advertising...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #26  
Old 08-05-2007
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by FMD
man u seriously need to get lucky!
I'm not saying I'm desperate. I was just saying that I enjoy other forms of getting around, and that when I bike the scenery is good.
 
  #27  
Old 08-08-2007
Bhavesh's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: City, State
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
great...it's about time that they're advertising it

as for the gas mileage debate...I've found that for every 20 rangers I see:
-10 of them get sucky gas mileage: 12-15mpg
-4 of them do bad, but ok: 15-18mpg
-3 of them do ok: 18-22mpg
-2 of them do well: 22-25
-1 of them will be awesome: 28+

since 17/20 rangers do ok/bad, I'd say rangers on the whole don't get good gas mileage
 
  #28  
Old 08-08-2007
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Coeburn va
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.3 liter manual ....no offense to anyone that owes one but my 3.0 hardly goes...i mean hills kick my *** how do you handle it?
 

Last edited by Underwear Gnome; 08-09-2007 at 05:33 PM.
  #29  
Old 08-09-2007
dj wayne's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I get 31 mpg on the freeway. My truck is a '03, 4 cylinder, automatic, regular cab, with stock size tires. It's got plenty of power to get around town, a little sluggish on hills but still okay.

I'm surprised the foreign trucks aren't getting better mileage, but I didn't want a foreign truck, I wanted a Ranger. From what I've heard Rangers are very dependable also. I had a Ford Tempo for about 11 years and it was a very dependable car. I'm expecting the same dependability from the Ranger. So far, so good.
 
  #30  
Old 08-09-2007
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Underwear Gnome
2.4 liter manual ....no offense to anyone that owes one but my 3.0 hardly goes...i mean hills kick my *** how do you handle it?
wouldnt know they never make a 2.4L ranger...
 
  #31  
Old 08-09-2007
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Coeburn va
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Redneckstone]wouldnt know they never make a 2.4L ranger...[/QUOTE

Sry typo
 
  #32  
Old 08-12-2007
Meek's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Finleyville, PA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
yes i do.....i speced out a new '08 FX4 Off-Road with the options like a Level II and it was $29,700 + all the extra crap.....that is crazy!

that is what i paid for mine .... sold my 07 Mustang GT after i moved back to PA. cant justify keeping the GT if i cant drive it all year so im happy with the ranger ... will replace the stang in a few years
The 07 Mustang GT got better MPG than the 08 Ranger when my foot wasnt in the floor.
David
 

Last edited by Meek; 08-12-2007 at 08:01 PM.
  #33  
Old 08-12-2007
D94R's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lehi, Utah
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
ya 4cyl reg cab LOL....
The extended cab 2.3 5 speeds get great mileage too. Have a friend who has one, he does mixed driving and gets about 27MPG out of it.

I had an 05 2.3 5 speed. Drove it 80% high way, 20% other. I averaged 28-30Mpg with that. Got a best of 32Mpg a couple times too.
 
  #34  
Old 08-12-2007
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Underwear Gnome
2.3 liter manual ....no offense to anyone that owes one but my 3.0 hardly goes...i mean hills kick my *** how do you handle it?

FOOT to the floor and hope for the best.... Mountains... my truck is WOT and will crest most 5% grades at about 40-50 MPH.... and that is hitting them at 75-80 MPH running start.
 
  #35  
Old 08-12-2007
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
you guys must have automatics...
 
  #36  
Old 08-12-2007
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Coeburn va
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Si automatic
 
  #37  
Old 08-13-2007
D94R's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lehi, Utah
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yah, I never had a problem with slowing down on grades with my 2.3. Just drop her down a gear before your engine strains you should have no problems. Even in an automatic, kick off the overdrive before you approach the grade, that way you are in the upper part of your power band when you start. The truck itself doesn't know you are going up a grade, it just sees a higher load on the engine, then it down shifts. If you rely on that, then you are straining the engine longer then needed, then down shifting continually loses speed as you constantly stay out of the power band.

Think ahead of time and downshift early and you wont have problems.
 
  #38  
Old 08-17-2007
97whitexlt's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my 97 2.3 5spd gets right around 30 on the highway, and that is fairly consistent as I travel between ashland and columbus 2x per week. all highway driving non stop 160 mile round trip. one tank easily for those 320 miles.
 
  #39  
Old 08-25-2007
xxx4life02's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: winston salem, nc
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and there again....the mpg the factory advertises is not actual real life driving....AAA did a study earlier in the year i believe, and they found out that what the manufacturers are putting on their windows (especially with hybrids) are actually lab results, not real world results...so just keep that in mind when searching for new cars based on mpg's
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rick-RF
General Ford Ranger Discussion
3
07-15-2011 10:35 AM
BlackRanger04
General Ford Ranger Discussion
12
06-30-2010 03:25 PM



Quick Reply: Looks like Ford is finally advertising...



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.