General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

New truck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-03-2009
kx592's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: asbury
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New truck

I finally purchased an 05 3.0 2wd extended cab ranger off my grandfather. I bought it off him with 14750 miles for 6000. Its spot less and has a bed cover over it. Truck runs like a champ, im very please with it. Just takes some getting use to since im use ot driving my 250 lol Anywho, I calculated milege one time and got 22.3 combined driving, fairly easy. I thought I should be getting better than that with a 3.0 2wd? Also After getting my oil changed and throatle body cleaned i can notice a decline in milege? Any input fellas? Thanks
 
  #2  
Old 11-03-2009
Crackerstein's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Basically hanging out, sm
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
22.3 sounds about right for your gas mileage.

The 3.0 is known for the power of a four cylinder and the fuel economy of the 4.0 V6.

My single cab 2wd 3.0 gets an average of 20 or so.
 
  #3  
Old 11-03-2009
96RpAaNjGoErR's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: wellington
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PICS???
 
  #4  
Old 11-03-2009
kx592's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: asbury
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you saying a 4.0 gets better millage than the 3.0? I thought the 3.0 was the better motor for millage and the 4.0 was for moderate towing. Ill get pics up one of these days. Its a bone stock gold extend. 6ft.

Any cheap intake systems available for this motor and is it worth the money?
 
  #5  
Old 11-03-2009
KLC's Avatar
KLC
KLC is offline
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by kx592
Any cheap intake systems available for this motor and is it worth the money?
In my opinion, they are not worth the money on a stock tuned engine. Good cold air intakes are pretty expensive. I would just get a good drop-in filter for the stock CAI, maybe take out the snorkel.
 
  #6  
Old 11-03-2009
kx592's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: asbury
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KLC
In my opinion, they are not worth the money. Good cold air intakes are pretty expensive. I would just get a good drop-in filter for the stock CAI.
Im not familiar with what your talkin about. can you explain that a little more, maybe post a link to the item? Id appreciate it man
 
  #7  
Old 11-03-2009
KLC's Avatar
KLC
KLC is offline
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Like these: AFE Pro-Dry S Air Filters

The one I linked is reusable and oil-free.
 
  #8  
Old 11-03-2009
kx592's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: asbury
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hows the improvement using this compared to stock? Do you notice better performance and millage or not really?
 
  #9  
Old 11-03-2009
KLC's Avatar
KLC
KLC is offline
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by kx592
Hows the improvement using this compared to stock? Do you notice better performance and millage or not really?
An increased throttle response and a slight MPG increase have been reported. I feel the change is negligible, but it won't hurt. Not to mention, you won't have to buy any filters for awhile.
 
  #10  
Old 11-03-2009
Grot's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Knox, Tennessee
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My 2.3 is only gettin 16-18 MPG. Id love 22
 
  #11  
Old 11-03-2009
Crackerstein's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Basically hanging out, sm
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kx592
Are you saying a 4.0 gets better millage than the 3.0? I thought the 3.0 was the better motor for millage and the 4.0 was for moderate towing. Ill get pics up one of these days. Its a bone stock gold extend. 6ft.

Any cheap intake systems available for this motor and is it worth the money?
No, the 3.0 gets better than the 4.0, but not much. The 4.0 however has much more HP.

The 2.3L gets MUCH better MPG, with just slightly less HP and torque than the 3.0.



The 3.0 is however, known to be a pretty solid, reliable motor.
 
  #12  
Old 11-04-2009
DillonT's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow. i get like 13-15 mpg with my 3.0 your lucky!
 
  #13  
Old 11-04-2009
wildbill's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Crestwood
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Get rid of that air silencer and get a free breathing drop-in filter. You can get more ambitious with a less restrictive exhaust, but then you're spending some money. Anyway, easy in and easy out always improves a motors power and economy.

I don't know why cleaning your TB hurt the mileage...it should have helped a little.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shuckyd
New Ideas
24
08-07-2012 07:50 PM
TRAVELER
Member Introductions
28
09-22-2009 01:19 PM
red_ranger_2000
Member Introductions
30
07-24-2008 12:27 AM
Duke
Member Introductions
15
06-21-2008 01:35 PM



Quick Reply: New truck



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 AM.