View Poll Results: What should be the next step?
Leave the DAMN TRUCK ALONE
30
34.09%
Double lift it ASAP
40
45.45%
Double lift it when the tires wear out
18
20.45%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll
Should the Jeweler double lift???????
#51
Just like trent said. I wasn't saying the lift kit was unreliable. Just stating that if he feels his truck is reliable as is. He had another option without going through the expense of doing a lift kit.
He could add the 1-2" front and 2-2.5" in back for about 50-60 bucks vs 1500 for a lift.
He could add the 1-2" front and 2-2.5" in back for about 50-60 bucks vs 1500 for a lift.
#52
because your stock suspension is so much higher than a stock trucks?
Last time I looked your frame rails are still at the same height they came from the factory.
Only thing a bodylift truly does is provide clearance for bigger tires cheaply. Does not turn your truck into a offroad beast.
Last time I looked your frame rails are still at the same height they came from the factory.
Only thing a bodylift truly does is provide clearance for bigger tires cheaply. Does not turn your truck into a offroad beast.
heres a pick for you "offroad expert" we messured.... my truck was 6+ inchs taller than this stock 4x4 from the frame rail to the ground...
Last edited by TheBearJeweler; 01-14-2009 at 07:28 AM.
#53
Let me put it this way...
You run 35s and you will be replacing brakes, TREs, balljoints, hubs, etc probably once a year or 1.5 years. 35s wear the crap out of the ranger front end.
I had my 35s for 6-8 months and EVERYTHING was worn out. Which is why I went with SAS. Now I drove my truck 20K + miles a year. I loved it double lifted but it was crazy expensive IMO.
When my ranger was on 33s for a year it was perfect, I really enjoyed it. But dont get me wrong I still like the truck to where it is, but I would have had a ton more money if I would have just stuck with 33s.
You run 35s and you will be replacing brakes, TREs, balljoints, hubs, etc probably once a year or 1.5 years. 35s wear the crap out of the ranger front end.
I had my 35s for 6-8 months and EVERYTHING was worn out. Which is why I went with SAS. Now I drove my truck 20K + miles a year. I loved it double lifted but it was crazy expensive IMO.
When my ranger was on 33s for a year it was perfect, I really enjoyed it. But dont get me wrong I still like the truck to where it is, but I would have had a ton more money if I would have just stuck with 33s.
#54
#55
Let me put it this way...
You run 35s and you will be replacing brakes, TREs, balljoints, hubs, etc probably once a year or 1.5 years. 35s wear the crap out of the ranger front end.
I had my 35s for 6-8 months and EVERYTHING was worn out. Which is why I went with SAS. Now I drove my truck 20K + miles a year. I loved it double lifted but it was crazy expensive IMO.
When my ranger was on 33s for a year it was perfect, I really enjoyed it. But dont get me wrong I still like the truck to where it is, but I would have had a ton more money if I would have just stuck with 33s.
You run 35s and you will be replacing brakes, TREs, balljoints, hubs, etc probably once a year or 1.5 years. 35s wear the crap out of the ranger front end.
I had my 35s for 6-8 months and EVERYTHING was worn out. Which is why I went with SAS. Now I drove my truck 20K + miles a year. I loved it double lifted but it was crazy expensive IMO.
When my ranger was on 33s for a year it was perfect, I really enjoyed it. But dont get me wrong I still like the truck to where it is, but I would have had a ton more money if I would have just stuck with 33s.
#57
#59
I agree with Zack. When I had my SL with 33's I had no front end issues then I went to 35's for a short time and when I sold my truck it needed a lot of front end work. I would say it need everything Zack said and some.
If you want to improve your offroad ability through a locker in the front and you will be surprised what your truck will do.
If you want to improve your offroad ability through a locker in the front and you will be surprised what your truck will do.
Last edited by casfz1; 01-14-2009 at 08:07 AM.
#61
Ever heard of hydrolock??????????????????????????????????? my truck is 6 inchs taller than a stock 4x4 as far as airbox height... and lets see... my tires are 33's and stock 4x4 comes with 29s... so there 4 inches... then i cranked my tbars 2.5 inchs.... so my truck is overall 6 inches taller than a stock 4x4.
heres a pick for you "offroad expert" we messured.... my truck was 6+ inchs taller than this stock 4x4 from the frame rail to the ground...
heres a pick for you "offroad expert" we messured.... my truck was 6+ inchs taller than this stock 4x4 from the frame rail to the ground...
your truck came with 30.8" tires
3" BL
tires only lift a truck half as much of the increased size. so 32.8-30.8= 2 / 2 = 1
So 4" of lift right there. Now if you cranked the Tbars maybe 1.5" to 2" if your lucky.
#62
Let me put it this way...
You run 35s and you will be replacing brakes, TREs, balljoints, hubs, etc probably once a year or 1.5 years. 35s wear the crap out of the ranger front end.
I had my 35s for 6-8 months and EVERYTHING was worn out. Which is why I went with SAS. Now I drove my truck 20K + miles a year. I loved it double lifted but it was crazy expensive IMO.
When my ranger was on 33s for a year it was perfect, I really enjoyed it. But dont get me wrong I still like the truck to where it is, but I would have had a ton more money if I would have just stuck with 33s.
You run 35s and you will be replacing brakes, TREs, balljoints, hubs, etc probably once a year or 1.5 years. 35s wear the crap out of the ranger front end.
I had my 35s for 6-8 months and EVERYTHING was worn out. Which is why I went with SAS. Now I drove my truck 20K + miles a year. I loved it double lifted but it was crazy expensive IMO.
When my ranger was on 33s for a year it was perfect, I really enjoyed it. But dont get me wrong I still like the truck to where it is, but I would have had a ton more money if I would have just stuck with 33s.
#65
#66
And the picture you took next to a new truck, keep in mind that the new 4x4's are like 1 inch lower for some reason than previous years.
Tires and momentum are prob the reason you did not get stuck in the creek, slap a set of bfg at's on a stock 4x4 and it will go through the same stuff.
#67
#68
To be honest i regret ever goin any bigger then just the body lift. i have enuff $$ in the truck now that im sure could have been spent better elsewhere. yes i still love the truck, but i rarely drive it anymore. i choose to drive the T-bird most of the time just because i dont get 20 people gawkin at me everytime i stop..lol if u want it bigger go for it tho. just hope that gas does not spike back up to $4 a gallon
#70
because your stock suspension is so much higher than a stock trucks?
Last time I looked your frame rails are still at the same height they came from the factory.
Only thing a bodylift truly does is provide clearance for bigger tires cheaply. Does not turn your truck into a offroad beast.
Last time I looked your frame rails are still at the same height they came from the factory.
Only thing a bodylift truly does is provide clearance for bigger tires cheaply. Does not turn your truck into a offroad beast.
listen. if he where to install a super lift on his stock 31's his frame might be higher but the limiting factor of his front IFS and his rear diff are still stock hight thus would cause him to scrape the diffs on anything..
now body lift your frame rails dont go up and neither does your diffs.
the only way to gain diff clearness which is usually the huge main limiter is tires thats how you get clearness so yes body lift is now allowing his truck to sit 2-2.5" higher then it was before.. also it helps approach angles front and rear of the body...
hell go ask beard he got his truck stuck front going forward with SAS at the dunes on 35's because of his diff..
yes with out the frame rails higher you can high center but you usually smack the IFS or rear diff on something first..
#71
not true he is running M/T so if a stock with BFG A/T went anywhere with mud being that they turn into slicks he would get horribly stuck and his M/T would drag him threw it good try tho
#72
A stock 4x4 or 4x2 ranger would never make it through that without hydrolocking.
Only truck I would ever take through that would be a Lifted 4wd.
Ben's air box was never in any danger. The angel he hit that and went through it was always on the driver side. The passenger side never was low
Series of pictures
These pictures taken by me were taken thousands of seconds apart
Never do you see his passenger side in the water.
I know some of you will say O the first one his passenger side is in the water.
That was just splash the water was going away from the truck
Only truck I would ever take through that would be a Lifted 4wd.
Ben's air box was never in any danger. The angel he hit that and went through it was always on the driver side. The passenger side never was low
Series of pictures
These pictures taken by me were taken thousands of seconds apart
Never do you see his passenger side in the water.
I know some of you will say O the first one his passenger side is in the water.
That was just splash the water was going away from the truck
#75