The Truth Behind the 3.0L V6
#1
The Truth Behind the 3.0L V6
How is the 3.0L V6 motor? I keep hearing it has the power of the 4 banger and the gas mileage of the 4.0L. I currently have the 2.5L 4 banger and am looking at a Ranger with the 3.0L V6. Will I see an improvement in power and acceleration? I won't be towing or anything just daily driving.
What is your opinion of the 3.0L V6 motor?
What is your opinion of the 3.0L V6 motor?
The following users liked this post:
Zackcaldwell (06-12-2022)
#8
#9
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
maybe mine is just a p.o.s but my 3.0 in my 08 needs a new head gasket already, I've been talking to people and apparently the head gasket is a big problem with them. I've had countless other problems with my truck too. So needless to say im getting rid of it and will never buy a ford again, at least not a ranger.
#11
I have a '99 with a 3.0 auto that is a supercab, and it is a solid motor. It's got 190,000 on the clock and is still running strong. With the stock-sized tires on it i could easily get 18-20 mpg on about 60% city 40% hwy. Also, it has enough power to have fun with and get me in some trouble with the cops. I don't believe you will find much more of a durable engine and think its a fairly good mix between power/reliability
#12
The 3.0 isn't as bad as most make it out to be. if you just like to DD it and take it on occasional fun trips, it a good little motor. Like everyone says the mileage isnt the best but then again it isnt the worst either. In spring to fall I average a good amount of driving and get about 19 MPG in the winter it dropps to about 15 - 16 MPG. Everything else I can say and have said has already been said. Few simple add ons can make it a little bit better of an experience
#13
Junk.
No power, and crap fuel mileage. If you want MPG get a 4 banger and if you want power get a 4.0L. Everyone says they are bulletproof engines and all this other BS, but they aren't. They have two pretty big common issues that they are apparently infamous for. The first being the cam position sensor sync going bad and the second being a pain in the *** coolant leak. The leak comes from the timing chain cover gasket which is located behind the waterpump and takes a bunch of time to replace. Mine is currently leaking.
Get a 4.0l or a 2.3l
No power, and crap fuel mileage. If you want MPG get a 4 banger and if you want power get a 4.0L. Everyone says they are bulletproof engines and all this other BS, but they aren't. They have two pretty big common issues that they are apparently infamous for. The first being the cam position sensor sync going bad and the second being a pain in the *** coolant leak. The leak comes from the timing chain cover gasket which is located behind the waterpump and takes a bunch of time to replace. Mine is currently leaking.
Get a 4.0l or a 2.3l
#14
#15
I agree, mine is an 04 3.0 4x4 Regular cab ranger and it's great for my daily driver. It's night and day difference over my 2001 Ford Ranger 3.0 Regular Cab Ranger 5 speed....I don't know why the 04 feels so much stronger. Same gears, exhaust, and everything.
#18
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont know how people get that fuel mileage, i get 12-13 mpg and the lift/tires didnt really change that at all. it was amybe 13-14 before them. its got 2 HP more then the 2.3, I don't do anything extreme with my truck, I DD it, I've taken it on the odd mild trails, but if i had the opportunity to swap it out for something else i would. IMO Its junk
#19
The camshaft synchronizer was quite a shock to me when mine went bad.I have a 2002 3.0 liter..I didn't know what it was.I had a squeaking sound and luckily I found out on this web site what the problem was.I think the 4.0 also has the scynchronizer.The scary part of the synchronizer is that is connected to the oil pump.If you lose the oil pump you might lock up your engine.My mileage is not that good and power is not that great.It is what it is.Luckily I have not major problems.Just ghost type stuff that makes you scratch your head.Thanks to Toreador I was able to put lights in the instrument cluster.
#20
I agree with the anti 3.0 sentiment. It is an OK motor, but new or used I have no idea why anybody would buy one when a 4.0 pretty much costs the same. The 2001 I bought new, the 4.0 was something like a $600 option. Big whoop the difference between 22K and 23K is nothing when you are spending that much. The mileage IIRC is about the same for comparable equipped rangers, I still think they rate at 15 city and 19 highway on a 3.0 4X4 with 4:10's.
And used, not that I ever looked at one, but used rangers with 4.0’s are so cheap I can’t imagine even looking for a 3.0.
~HJ
P.S. not that this matters much as my advice is get a 4.0, but isn’t the 3.0 a PITA to change the oil filter on a 4x4? It has been at least 10 years since I have changed one but I remember cussing, swearing and burning my arm.
And used, not that I ever looked at one, but used rangers with 4.0’s are so cheap I can’t imagine even looking for a 3.0.
~HJ
P.S. not that this matters much as my advice is get a 4.0, but isn’t the 3.0 a PITA to change the oil filter on a 4x4? It has been at least 10 years since I have changed one but I remember cussing, swearing and burning my arm.
#21
Nah, it's not bad at all after 04 becuase there ins't an EGR valve in the way to change it from the top. I can easily access the it from the top.
#23
Only time I ever changed them was in High school when I worked for Valvoline Rapid oil change. I remember cussing rangers with 3.0's and 95+ cavaliers with automatics. dranted with was 1998-99 so a while ago.
#24
#25