General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Gas mileage results w/Tonno cover

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-10-2005
winks's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jackson, New Jersey
Posts: 4,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gas mileage results w/Tonno cover

For the past few weeks, I've been moving things into my new place from mom and dad's. Because of this, I've just left my tonno cover rolled up (laziness is the cause of this experiment). I've recorded my mileage with the cover on and off, durring the last few weeks and figured I'd post my findings for anybody interested. The truck is a 2004 Edge, 4.0 liter, 5 speed with 4.10 gears and 33 inch tires. The tonno cover is a soft, snap cover made by TruckTek The results are skewed a bit because of the larger tires, and transporting some light loads.
For normal driving, mostly highway but with a lot of traffic lights in between, and little city driving, my mileage with the tonno cover on averaged out to be 16.67 mpg. With the tonno cover off my mileage has averaged 16.50 mpg. Once again, the true numbers are skewed due to the larger tires.
I used a number of $2.80 for the price per gallon of gas and divided that by my mileage. This gave me $0.168 as the cost to drive one mile with the tonno on, and $0.170 as the cost to drive one mile with the tonno off. Next I used a number of $200 for a toono cover, I believe that's about average. If my calculations are correct, it would take 100,000 miles of driving with the tonno cover on to make up the savings to pay for the expense of the tonno cover. I made this up pretty quick, so it is possible that I have made some mistakes, if you catch any, feel free to post.

CLIFF NOTES VERSION:

The tonno cover will save you roughly $0.002 per mile. You'd have to drive 100,000 miles with the cover on in order to make up the price of a $200.00 cover.
 
  #2  
Old 10-10-2005
GregsEdge's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lol thats funny...I'd rather put 200 in my tank hah. Good info anyways
 
  #3  
Old 10-10-2005
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
yes but you need to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of having a tonneu cover.

to me i dont care if it gets worse with one, i want one.
 
  #4  
Old 10-10-2005
winks's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jackson, New Jersey
Posts: 4,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't get worse, it gets better, but very little for the money. It is nice to have, keeps my tools and whatever else back there hidden.
 
  #5  
Old 10-10-2005
RangerJustin's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i like having more space to store stuff in the bed without worrying about theft...
 
  #6  
Old 10-10-2005
DaneTrain's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wellington, CO
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, mine isn't "much" better with the tonneau, but I love mine. It retracts, and still is a hard top.
 
  #7  
Old 10-10-2005
fx4me's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I do too much tailgating to have a tonneau. I always have my bed filled with people.
 
  #8  
Old 10-10-2005
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Pretty good, John. Way back in GenEdge days, some of us did some testing and concluded that the Ranger does not have a "bed turbulence" problem for some reason of the aerodynamics -- though none of us could point to why.

But quite a few people with tonneaus tried this and nobody got any data supporting that idea that a tonneau saves any money. All the results showed either a slight gain or slight loss -- but overall it was a wash.

I don't doubt that some pickups have a problem with this -- just not the modern Rangers.
 
  #9  
Old 10-10-2005
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I have also done this a while ago just after i put the 32's on i can avarage anywhere from no difference at all with it to about 2mpg. its all in driving habits...
 
  #10  
Old 10-10-2005
SonicBlueFIB's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Roscoe, IL
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bought my 2004 4.0 Ranger Edge in May 2004. I have tracked the fuel mileage of my truck for every tank of gas that has gone in. That means that every time I went to the gas station I filled the truck all the way up, then recorded mileage from the trip meter and figured out what my fuel economy was for that tank. This is all recorded in an excel sheet. I now have 30895 miles on the truck, have filled up 133 times and purchased 1718.91 gallons for a total of $3684.40 (ouch). Total average fuel economy for the truck is 17.97 mpg.

The truck was bone stock for 13548 miles. During that time my average fuel economy was 17.74 mpg.

At 13548 miles I installed a K&N air filter. I didn't expect any gains in fuel economy, but I noted the change just to see. Without making any other changes I drove the truck for 14452 miles. During that time my average was 17.94 mpg, basically no change.

I then installed a tonneau cover at 28000 miles. Since then I have driven 2895 miles. My average has gone up to 19.18 mpg, however, this data is not as good of an average as the other data because I just don't have as many data points.

Bottom line: I haven't noticed much change since I installed the cover. Its nice to have a place to keep things hidden and dry though.

Oh Yeah, for all the tailgate droppers or tailgate removers: There was no noticeable difference up, down, or off.
 
  #11  
Old 10-10-2005
3LiterBeater's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The numbers are too gray area to call it anything but a wash. Sooo many factors, that unless the numbers come back blatantly higher or lower with the cover you can't really determine either way as to its benefit. I say, Tonneaus are for covering your bed, not getting better fuel mileage...
 
  #12  
Old 10-10-2005
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i noitced a difference of about 4mpg more on my 92 with the tonneau and no difference on my 02 its the same tonneau cover too
 
  #13  
Old 10-10-2005
3LiterBeater's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by gatorblue92
i noitced a difference of about 4mpg more on my 92 with the tonneau and no difference on my 02 its the same tonneau cover too
Must have to do with the cab design then, Just the way the air circulates off the end of the cab and into the bed?
 
  #14  
Old 10-10-2005
92 Ranger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good i need to save gas money anywho
 
  #15  
Old 10-10-2005
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Yes, that's why I said the more modern Rangers. The older squarer ones must have different aerodynamics which influence all this.
 
  #16  
Old 10-10-2005
rideac1's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Kensington, PA
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I read somewhere that leaving the tailgate down rather than up (without a tonneau cover) is actually better. It gives more downforce and somehow creates LESS drag, this was in an auto magazine somewhere during the summer. They didn't do any tests with a tonneau but said that it would help if anything for mileage. I have one and can't tell if there's a gain or not. I like how it looks and for putting stuff under it though.
 
  #17  
Old 10-10-2005
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Yah but there is a downside to no tailgate. I don't remember who explained this or who told me(god everything I know could be smart, if I just had sources! I'll jus say John Griggs told me). But if you don't have a tailgate on your truckbed then the bedside support is gone. so like, your bed can either bow in our out over the years. Also in a carcrash, your chances of F'ing up your bed are greater since there's that crosssupport we call teh tailgate.


But, hey, tailgate down looks cool!

Aaron
 
  #18  
Old 10-11-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somewhere, XYZ
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I keep a fuel log for my truck. I've logged every gallon of gas I've pumped through this thing since I took delivery from my dealer back in '03. I've done entire tanks w/ and w/o the tonneau installed, closed, on summer vs winter (tight vs loose) snap setting and I've yet to see any conclusive differences either.

The tonneau may save you some fuel, but not enough to be worthwhile.
Originally Posted by 3LiterBeater
The numbers are too gray area to call it anything but a wash. Sooo many factors, that unless the numbers come back blatantly higher or lower with the cover you can't really determine either way as to its benefit. I say, Tonneaus are for covering your bed, not getting better fuel mileage...
I couldn't agree more!

As for the tailgate up vs down, this has been discussed at length. Somewhere around here there is a discussion about a paper done by some Mech-E college students where they wind-tunnel tested a model of a pickup body w/ different types of 'aerodynamics enhancements'. The moral was that pretty much none of them helped much.. except dropping the tailgate HURT aerodynamics quite a bit! It destroy's a relatively high pressure bubble that forms in the bed and creates quite a bit of drag behind the cab..
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ClemsonRanger03
Ranger Products, Company, & Member Reviews
10
07-07-2010 07:13 PM
FULLSCALE
General Ford Ranger Discussion
12
06-11-2010 08:08 PM
Johns777
OLD - Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc.
4
01-20-2010 04:35 PM
FMD
General Ford Ranger Discussion
11
11-07-2009 11:46 AM
n3elz
Ranger Products, Company, & Member Reviews
22
06-02-2005 07:53 PM



Quick Reply: Gas mileage results w/Tonno cover



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 PM.