WTF Ford? 2010 F-150 4.6L Triton pictures - Page 2 - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource


General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #26  
Old 03-20-2010
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianjwilson View Post
The air doesn't sit there long enough to heat up much I'm sure.
Even that ugly setup is probably colder than 90% of the aftermarket "cold air intakes" that are out there.
you mean the HOT air intakes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by zabeard View Post
I LOL

this is one of the dumbest things i have read this morning... lol
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-20-2010
Needforspeed3685's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lowell, AR
Posts: 1,836
I'm just shocked to find such "extra" intake runner volume that is absolutely unnecessary except for EPA numbers. The over-all view of the engine isn't too impressive, either.

Name:  0317101721-03.jpg
Views: 2
Size:  58.8 KB
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-20-2010
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,045
your point? its a truck i bet that thing will take so much abuse and work that it doesnt really matter. who looks under the hood anyway? i dont look under mine even when i had a supercharger or now that i have a 5.4. its an engine if it functions then that works for me!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-20-2010
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Killafornia
Posts: 1,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Needforspeed3685 View Post
I'm just shocked to find such "extra" intake runner volume that is absolutely unnecessary except for EPA numbers. The over-all view of the engine isn't too impressive, either.

larger intake runners would help a motor, since they would flow more easily threw the plenum, a manifold with larger runners would make more power and more mpg, it is less meaning full on efi since you dont need the added intake volume for air fuel mix but larger runner wouldnt hurt.

and how do you know did you pull the top of the motor apart and measure them out?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-21-2010
johndeeregarner's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Memphis
Posts: 157
Welcome to the future.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Triton blowout plug question amgcustoms General Ford Ranger Discussion 5 11-24-2011 07:08 PM
2010 F-150 4x4 XLT leftofEDGE Ford Snapshots & Videos 15 05-29-2010 10:49 PM
f150 4.6 triton v8 or 4.0 sohc? 07silver4.0Lsport General Technical & Electrical 26 10-25-2009 10:20 PM
5.4L triton 99ranger4X4OFFROAD 8-Cylinder Tech 85 03-26-2008 02:47 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.