Project backhalf/3link
#301
Sounds like a plan man. Gona be sick. And I dont thjink you have to worry about the iroks looking funny on a 17" rim, its les sidewall to "balloon". Now when dudes put 42's on 15's, thats when it starts to look funny.
Last edited by INT3RC3PTOR; 07-22-2009 at 05:18 AM.
#303
#304
#306
on the iroks 39.5 and smaller they use a slightly different tread design than the 42 s
the 42s dont look ballooned on any size rim but u have my vote on the iroks
beside its function over form anyways who cares what they look like as long as they work right
btw pitbulls dont work that great and their sizes are off by about an inch
the 42s dont look ballooned on any size rim but u have my vote on the iroks
beside its function over form anyways who cares what they look like as long as they work right
btw pitbulls dont work that great and their sizes are off by about an inch
#308
they look bigger than like a spider 9 housing. idk.. could just be me.
but they also cost like $80 less.
the ones they had plans for at school was massive.. like the pumpkin was probably twice the size it had to be.
I've never really been impressed with the iroks performance to tell ya the truth.
but they also cost like $80 less.
the ones they had plans for at school was massive.. like the pumpkin was probably twice the size it had to be.
on the iroks 39.5 and smaller they use a slightly different tread design than the 42 s
the 42s dont look ballooned on any size rim but u have my vote on the iroks
beside its function over form anyways who cares what they look like as long as they work right
btw pitbulls dont work that great and their sizes are off by about an inch
the 42s dont look ballooned on any size rim but u have my vote on the iroks
beside its function over form anyways who cares what they look like as long as they work right
btw pitbulls dont work that great and their sizes are off by about an inch
#309
#310
I just charged the shocks to 85 psi, i hope that is close. I read that Fox air shocks provide 1.15 pounds of spring force for every pound of nitrogen pressure. So I needed around 80 in/lb.
Lets just say last night sucked, I am not a fan of hard brake lines that you have to flare yourself. :)
Lets just say last night sucked, I am not a fan of hard brake lines that you have to flare yourself. :)
#311
Zach man! You need to get some dimple dies and do some custom plating on that thing - it would look SICK + Add some more sturdiness (not that its needed). Craft up a spot to mount up a fire saftey kit, and a highlift and lots of plating on teh sides + a spare or two.. yeah.. yum!
#313
I got a deal on them. Its not permanent. I know they are not ideal for what I am going to do with the truck but I didnt want the 1200$ price tag of coilovers yet. Hopefully they work ok for me for a while, seems alot of people are starting to use them.
Jey have you guys used any 18" coilovers? What are they doing with springs? Last I read I didnt think anyone made a 20" coil?
Jey have you guys used any 18" coilovers? What are they doing with springs? Last I read I didnt think anyone made a 20" coil?
#315
#317
if i spent that much on coil overs i wouldn't want them acting as the limit strap.
#318
i mean the problem is the slider between the main and the tender will catch on the shock body if the main isnt long enough. you really need like an 18" coil to cover the whole shaft and part of the body when full droop.
i do thinkin limit straps but i dont think you 'must' have them.
that is where my truck lacks. Limit straps and bump stops. LOL
#321
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Corvallis,OR
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
on the iroks 39.5 and smaller they use a slightly different tread design than the 42 s
the 42s dont look ballooned on any size rim but u have my vote on the iroks
beside its function over form anyways who cares what they look like as long as they work right
btw pitbulls dont work that great and their sizes are off by about an inch
the 42s dont look ballooned on any size rim but u have my vote on the iroks
beside its function over form anyways who cares what they look like as long as they work right
btw pitbulls dont work that great and their sizes are off by about an inch
#322
Single 18". I'm running a single 600lbx18"x3" coil in the front on an 8" shock, and the rear is running a dual rate 300/400 with a 400lbx18"x3" lower spring and 300lbx16"x3" upper, on a 16" shock. All Eibach springs on SAW shocks.
#324
i'm willing to sacrifice travel to save hundreds of dollars in shocks.
i totally disagree!!! in the rocks, slick and dry... My pitbulls performed better than the iroks. Iroks are a real good tire but my pitbulls just did better. Plus iroks chunk way too easy for my taste. Just cause everyone and their mom has iroks, doesn't mean they are all that great. Just IMO.