Project Logs For detailed builds specific to the Ford Ranger, one thread per vehicle please.

Project backhalf/3link

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #301  
Old 07-21-2009
INT3RC3PTOR's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minnesooooota
Posts: 8,201
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by zabeard
im pretty stuck on the Kores since they are members of the pirate community and he seems like a pretty cool guy and it comes with a good price. Probably just get some 17x9 cragers and weld that kore beadlock to it.
Sounds like a plan man. Gona be sick. And I dont thjink you have to worry about the iroks looking funny on a 17" rim, its les sidewall to "balloon". Now when dudes put 42's on 15's, thats when it starts to look funny.
 

Last edited by INT3RC3PTOR; 07-22-2009 at 05:18 AM.
  #302  
Old 07-21-2009
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
even 36s look funky..
 
  #303  
Old 07-21-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4
Those ballistic housings are fawking huge though!
well they look huge atleast..

and yea, i know what your talking about.. mega bucks..
have you seen ruff stuffs new housing? its not that big
 
  #304  
Old 07-21-2009
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Hey Zach I saw that ruff stuff sells those tube clamps also. If you wanted to get them and not have to wait for ballistic, that might be an option to look at.

Ruff Stuff's housing looks pretty nice too. I guess the model they got for it doesn't hurt either!
 
  #305  
Old 07-21-2009
SVT01RANGER's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West Eugene, OR
Posts: 3,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
looks good zach
 
  #306  
Old 07-21-2009
84socal's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: chino hills ,ca
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on the iroks 39.5 and smaller they use a slightly different tread design than the 42 s
the 42s dont look ballooned on any size rim but u have my vote on the iroks
beside its function over form anyways who cares what they look like as long as they work right



btw pitbulls dont work that great and their sizes are off by about an inch
 
  #307  
Old 07-21-2009
Pless215's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dewy Rose, GA
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i guess its time to wait for sema again so you can get another killer deal on tires
 
  #308  
Old 07-22-2009
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by zabeard
have you seen ruff stuffs new housing? its not that big
they look bigger than like a spider 9 housing. idk.. could just be me.
but they also cost like $80 less.

the ones they had plans for at school was massive.. like the pumpkin was probably twice the size it had to be.

Originally Posted by 84socal
on the iroks 39.5 and smaller they use a slightly different tread design than the 42 s
the 42s dont look ballooned on any size rim but u have my vote on the iroks
beside its function over form anyways who cares what they look like as long as they work right


btw pitbulls dont work that great and their sizes are off by about an inch
I've never really been impressed with the iroks performance to tell ya the truth.
 
  #309  
Old 07-22-2009
WowMike2001's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stevenson, WA
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Zach man! You need to get some dimple dies and do some custom plating on that thing - it would look SICK + Add some more sturdiness (not that its needed). Craft up a spot to mount up a fire saftey kit, and a highlift and lots of plating on teh sides + a spare or two.. yeah.. yum!
 
  #310  
Old 07-22-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
I just charged the shocks to 85 psi, i hope that is close. I read that Fox air shocks provide 1.15 pounds of spring force for every pound of nitrogen pressure. So I needed around 80 in/lb.

Lets just say last night sucked, I am not a fan of hard brake lines that you have to flare yourself. :)
 
  #311  
Old 07-22-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by WowMike2001
Zach man! You need to get some dimple dies and do some custom plating on that thing - it would look SICK + Add some more sturdiness (not that its needed). Craft up a spot to mount up a fire saftey kit, and a highlift and lots of plating on teh sides + a spare or two.. yeah.. yum!
it would be pretty cool but i dont have the tooling for it.
 
  #312  
Old 07-22-2009
034x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any particular reason you went with air shocks vs. coil-overs?
 
  #313  
Old 07-22-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
I got a deal on them. Its not permanent. I know they are not ideal for what I am going to do with the truck but I didnt want the 1200$ price tag of coilovers yet. Hopefully they work ok for me for a while, seems alot of people are starting to use them.

Jey have you guys used any 18" coilovers? What are they doing with springs? Last I read I didnt think anyone made a 20" coil?
 
  #314  
Old 07-22-2009
034x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zabeard
Jey have you guys used any 18" coilovers? What are they doing with springs? Last I read I didnt think anyone made a 20" coil?
We haven't used anything longer than a 16" shock. We use dual-rate on everything with a tender coil.
 
  #315  
Old 07-22-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Well even on the 16s they dont make an 18" main? I use dual rate too but I thought you wanted the main 2" longer than the travel so that the spring doesnt move off its pocket when fully extended?

Like my 14s I am using a 16" main and a 12" tender.
 
  #316  
Old 07-22-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Gearhead61
Hey Zach I saw that ruff stuff sells those tube clamps also. If you wanted to get them and not have to wait for ballistic, that might be an option to look at.

Ruff Stuff's housing looks pretty nice too. I guess the model they got for it doesn't hurt either!
good call!

i just ordered 4, i always forget they have multiple pages under each section.
 
  #317  
Old 07-22-2009
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by zabeard
Well even on the 16s they dont make an 18" main? I use dual rate too but I thought you wanted the main 2" longer than the travel so that the spring doesnt move off its pocket when fully extended?

Like my 14s I am using a 16" main and a 12" tender.
ever thought about using limit straps?

if i spent that much on coil overs i wouldn't want them acting as the limit strap.
 
  #318  
Old 07-22-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4
ever thought about using limit straps? it shouldn't go to the very end anyways...

if i spent that much on coil overs i wouldn't want them acting as the limit strap.
if you did that why not buy 14s?

i mean the problem is the slider between the main and the tender will catch on the shock body if the main isnt long enough. you really need like an 18" coil to cover the whole shaft and part of the body when full droop.


i do thinkin limit straps but i dont think you 'must' have them.

that is where my truck lacks. Limit straps and bump stops. LOL
 
  #319  
Old 07-22-2009
rngprerunner's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
18" springs exist. That's what I'm running, front and rear.
 
  #320  
Old 07-22-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Dual rate? what are the specs on your shocks jason?
 
  #321  
Old 07-22-2009
cory07ranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Corvallis,OR
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 84socal
on the iroks 39.5 and smaller they use a slightly different tread design than the 42 s
the 42s dont look ballooned on any size rim but u have my vote on the iroks
beside its function over form anyways who cares what they look like as long as they work right



btw pitbulls dont work that great and their sizes are off by about an inch
i totally disagree!!! in the rocks, slick and dry... My pitbulls performed better than the iroks. Iroks are a real good tire but my pitbulls just did better. Plus iroks chunk way too easy for my taste. Just cause everyone and their mom has iroks, doesn't mean they are all that great. Just IMO.
 
  #322  
Old 07-22-2009
rngprerunner's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by zabeard
Dual rate? what are the specs on your shocks jason?
Single 18". I'm running a single 600lbx18"x3" coil in the front on an 8" shock, and the rear is running a dual rate 300/400 with a 400lbx18"x3" lower spring and 300lbx16"x3" upper, on a 16" shock. All Eibach springs on SAW shocks.
 
  #323  
Old 07-22-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
did you have to use a spring compressor on the rear to get a 18 and a 16 on a 16" shock? i would imagine you did.
 
  #324  
Old 07-22-2009
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by zabeard
i do thinkin limit straps but i dont think you 'must' have them.

that is where my truck lacks. Limit straps and bump stops. LOL
meh
i'm willing to sacrifice travel to save hundreds of dollars in shocks.

Originally Posted by cory07ranger4x4
i totally disagree!!! in the rocks, slick and dry... My pitbulls performed better than the iroks. Iroks are a real good tire but my pitbulls just did better. Plus iroks chunk way too easy for my taste. Just cause everyone and their mom has iroks, doesn't mean they are all that great. Just IMO.
I've heard lots of stories with Iroks chunking.
 
  #325  
Old 07-22-2009
zabeard's Avatar
who?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4
I've heard lots of stories with Iroks chunking.

go look on pirate, every used set is nearly destroyed
 


Quick Reply: Project backhalf/3link



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 AM.