New Ideas Have a new idea for your Ford Ranger? General discussion of new ideas for the Ford Ranger.
View Poll Results: Yes No Maybe
Yes
26.67%
No
60.00%
Maybe
13.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

More airflow for the Poor Guy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2006
  #1  
The Dtapes's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: CB Ch.14
More airflow for the Poor Guy?

Okay, heres the idea. What if you were to run some tubing from a high airflow area (ex. under the bumper or in grill), perhaps with a funnel type end up to the airbox intake AREA. Would that not produce more colder air and higher airflow for the intake tube? The way it is now, at least my 03 edge, the intake tube is behind the passenger headlight. In theory this would produce more air blowing around in that area, and all you would have to do is spend a couple bucks on 2" or 3" tubing, perhaps a cone on the end, and some way of straping the tube up to behind the headlight. If you got really fancy you could customize a way to fit the cone in the lower grill so air is forced up through the tube to behind the headlight. There would be no cutting, drilling, screwing, etc. and you could very easily remove it. Notice: This is in theory and I didnt say strap it directly to the intake, although it could produce interesting results on the highway. I plan to test the theory soon, and I'll record the results for everyone. What does everyone think? Yes No
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006
  #2  
KARPE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 2
From: Valrico, Fl 33594
you'll be cleaning it alot more often, and more tubing means more surface area for the Block to heat that cold air.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006
  #3  
Chucks05EDGE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: City, PA
When you route air through serious angles, and redirect the flow....you cause a restriction, not a "RAM" effect.

Do a search for "snorkle" from a few days ago, Gay-briel started the thread, I believe John Griggs explained it better in that thread, in relation to the snorkle being an ineffective primary intake...
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006
  #4  
TrailRateThisFx4's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
From: Royal Oak, Michigan
I bought a kit made for a rice burner. that turns your intake into a ram air...well i had it routed to where it was mounted on the lower grill in the vallance....Did not see any change in power or anything. but when it rained i would suck water up in to the air box....plus also when we get good rains here in the fall we seem to get flooded streets and that was one other reason i took it off cause thats i would need to do is drive into a puddel and suck up a ton of water. im just saying to waste the time and money...
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006
  #5  
The Dtapes's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: CB Ch.14
Hmm. I didnt think about the rain and moisture. Keep in mind im not trying a ram air directly to the intake though. Im thinking more of a 90 degree angle to the intake tube. Just to provide more air in the area.
For lack of a picture... _[
l l
The heat from the engine is to be kept in mind, but could be carefully routed
It would have to be disabled during wet and rainy patches also.
Also this wouldnt be ideal for off roading, just on road. Keep em comin.
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006
  #6  
graniteguy's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 1
From: Texas
you want to do something like this:
http://volantperformance.com/pdetail...=1&ID=16857151

Notice how it is not sealed. That's the key to water invasion. Leave a hole in the bottom. The truck will push air into the box, not into your motor. There will be no RAM, just the cooler air. There will be no negative effect like a snorkel if you do it like this. Also no water worries.

My Mach 1 is the same way. There's two entries into the airbox. One from the shaker hood scoop and one from the fender, so it's not sealed. It can be driven into a rainstorm with no worries.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006
  #7  
mx98ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: GA
i think its more of a restriction... ask around... i think a few people on r-f have tried and had crappy results
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006
  #8  
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 11
From: usa
persaonlly just get a air intake system that as designed properly. and get a bama programmer that will yeild the performace your looking for
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2006
  #9  
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,239
Likes: 3
From: Delaware
some folks have hacked up the airbox to get more air in there but its not something i would do
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006
  #10  
The Dtapes's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: CB Ch.14
Not Yet

I still havent tried it yet, Ive been slackin. I plan to put it in tommorow and road test it soon after.
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2006
  #11  
jrfx4level2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: franksville,Wisconsin
your idea would probably do about the same as the tornado fuel saver. It was supposed to increase air flow but i was reading that this actually does not increase horsepower or gas mileage. air flow sensor controls the air flow so this wont help..
unlike a good air filter that makes it easier for your engine to draw in air.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006
  #12  
Oasis's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 533
Likes: 2
From: Anaheim Hills, CA
so your just trying to get more air into the engine compartment, right? specifically near the air box.... I vote NO... I'm no saying you shouldn't do it... but it's gonna be a waste of some material and a few bucks. Don't get your hopes up...
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
btrauth
General Technical & Electrical
5
Oct 26, 2010 04:45 PM
fx4wannabe
OLD - Engine & Drivetrain
8
Mar 21, 2010 04:00 PM
otter8418
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
3
Feb 26, 2010 09:10 PM
drppdyllwrngr
OLD - Engine & Drivetrain
1
Jan 14, 2010 04:58 PM
RangerJustin
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
2
Mar 16, 2005 02:28 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 AM.