Snapshots Share photos of vehicles in this sub-forum.

Might be finally getting a truck again...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-12-2009
ThatGuy's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kent, Ohio
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Might be finally getting a truck again...

AFter 2 years with a car... i might finally be getting back into a truck again. I had my options this time around, but im thinking im just going to stay with a Ranger :) With ohio winters being what they are, the fact that i have to always borrow my stepdads tacoma when i need to haul something, and with my car being as quick as it is (its going to get me in trouble, i know it lol) i just need to get back in a truck....

Here are my options... im trying to stay under $10,000... also im really itching for a regular car 4x4, just have always liked them.

All are automatics with the 3.0L in them...

Option 1.

2003 with 41K miles on it... $9000



Option 2.

2002 with 82K miles on it... $7500 (but i think they'll deal on it, they've had it a while)



Option 3.

2004 with 72K on it... all power options... $8700



Option 4.

2003 with 69K on it... $9500 (already has dual exhaust, tho needs adjusting, and clear corners)



And Last...

Option 5.

2003 with 73K on it... $8500



Let me know what you guys think... i have probably about a month or so before i can do anything. It would be nice to be back in a truck again... the car just isn't me lol

-Brad
 
  #2  
Old 01-12-2009
taknotes's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: nc
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I like option #3
 
  #3  
Old 01-12-2009
Lord Of War's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Thornton, Colorado
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Option #1 has the fewest miles. That would really catch my attention.
 
  #4  
Old 01-12-2009
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Lord Of War
Option #1 has the fewest miles. That would really catch my attention.
x2
 
  #5  
Old 01-12-2009
Silver's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: edenton,nc
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not a ext cab?
 
  #6  
Old 01-12-2009
Jazz921's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
option #2


and yeah, why not an extended cab?
 
  #7  
Old 01-12-2009
rolsmojave3's Avatar
Level III Supporter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Because regular cabs rock. I like that 04 with all power.
 
  #8  
Old 01-12-2009
TheBearJeweler's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Option 2 or 3. They are by far the nicest looking.
 
  #9  
Old 01-12-2009
freddie's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OH
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are any of those 4.0 4wd's???
 
  #10  
Old 01-12-2009
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by freddie
Are any of those 4.0 4wd's???
No all 3.0. 4.0 in regcab 4x4 was only in 01 and then brough back last year.


I vote number 1 do to the lower miles.
 
  #11  
Old 01-12-2009
freddie's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OH
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn... :( I vote for 1, 3 or 4. I like the Red #3, but I also like the black trucks.
 
  #12  
Old 01-12-2009
98liftedranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Posts: 12,538
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I like #3. But I'm partial to red. Also number 1.
 
  #14  
Old 01-12-2009
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I'm going with number 3
 
  #15  
Old 01-12-2009
wyldechild's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Option #4 should be eliminated right now...it looks like practically the same truck as number one...but has more miles, and is more expensive.

I would also say #1 because it seems like the best buy. It has the lowest miles, and is not too far off from the other trucks prices.

But all those trucks seem way over priced to me. A two wheel drive, 3.0 powered, reg cab ranger for 9k? I don't pay attention to Ranger resale values that much, but I do a bit. Seems like you should offer 6500
 
  #16  
Old 01-12-2009
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by wyldechild
Option #4 should be eliminated right now...it looks like practically the same truck as number one...but has more miles, and is more expensive.

I would also say #1 because it seems like the best buy. It has the lowest miles, and is not too far off from the other trucks prices.

But all those trucks seem way over priced to me. A two wheel drive, 3.0 powered, reg cab ranger for 9k? I don't pay attention to Ranger resale values that much, but I do a bit. Seems like you should offer 6500
All of them are 4x4. Learn to read n00b! lol j/k man
 
  #17  
Old 01-12-2009
RangerNDog's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Harrisonburg, VA
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I vote #1 due to the low miles. I got my 01 back in July with only 58K and #1 only has 41K.
 
  #18  
Old 01-12-2009
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I vote #3.
 
  #19  
Old 01-12-2009
Roddy's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
#3 for sure! (the loaded red one)

And i love the idea of a 4x4 regular cab!
 
  #20  
Old 01-12-2009
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
DO NOT GET NUMBER 1

Looking at the picture again it's been wrecked. Look at the front bumper!
 
  #21  
Old 01-12-2009
98liftedranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Posts: 12,538
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonic04Edge
DO NOT GET NUMBER 1

Looking at the picture again it's been wrecked. Look at the front bumper!
I don't see it.
 
  #22  
Old 01-12-2009
08rangerxl's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Under the Driver's side headlight you can see a big dent on the front bumper.
 
  #23  
Old 01-12-2009
98liftedranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Posts: 12,538
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Oh yeah I see it and the valance is all kinds of messed up.
 
  #24  
Old 01-12-2009
KLC's Avatar
KLC
KLC is offline
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Personally, from your choices, I would go with number three. It would be nice to find a Ranger with lower mileage though.
 
  #25  
Old 01-12-2009
a311fanam's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Westerly, RI
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
number 1
 


Quick Reply: Might be finally getting a truck again...



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 PM.