SOHC - 2.3L & 2.5L Lima Engines Discussions and Topics specific to the Lima 4 cylinder engines

Do I need the O2 sensor after the CAT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #1  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
Do I need the O2 sensor after the CAT?

Why is there two O2 sensors? My 96 Ranger 2.3 ltr has one O2 sensors in front of the Cat and one behind the Cat. I unpluged the one behind the Cat and can not tell any difference. No check engine lights or ill effects. I want to put on larger exhaust pipe and was wondering if I can ditch that second O2 sensor?? Do I need it? What does it do that the front one is not doing?
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #2  
Redbeard90's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #3  
Redbeard90's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
I'm no expert but I think it must monitor the performance of the converter. I can't believe it didn't set off the check engine light. I'd drive it for a while to make sure it doesn't do anything before you go ahead with your exhaust plans.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #4  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
The PCM infers conversion efficiency by comparing the ratio of the O2 sensor switch events before and after the cats. If the rear sensor is gone, you will get a CEL and trouble codes. It may take a couple or a few trips but it will happen.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #5  
timpat92855's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 3
From: Lousiville, MS
I had a ford tech tell me one day, the people that design vehicles always put things there for a reason...something to think about.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #6  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
The check engine light does work, but it's not come on since unplugging it and driving 15 miles.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #7  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
It takes a minimum of two trips with the same problem for the CEL to light. In the case of the Catalyst Monitor, it could take several trips because of the strict entry conditions for running the test.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #8  
timpat92855's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 3
From: Lousiville, MS
It will come on, the ecm is going to think the cat is no longer there and throw a code. rwenzing is right on the how it works part.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #9  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
So what does it do? It apparently doesn't change the fuel setting like the front sensor. As a Cat goes bad and clogs what good is it going to do measuring the efficiency before and after the Cat.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #10  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
No, the rear sensor does not affect fuel control at all. It is there to alert the driver and the state inspection station that the conversion efficiency of the cats has degraded to the point that it is no longer legal. Cat efficiency monitoring is mandated by the EPA.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2008
  #11  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
That makes since. So as long as I have a CAT but no 2nd sensor it should not effect the efficient running engine. right? If I don't get a CEL by this Friday, driving it every day between now and Friday. Do you think I would be ok to start my weekend project of changing the exhaust?
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008
  #12  
BlutoBodine's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 543
Likes: 3
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally Posted by bcoverss
That makes since. So as long as I have a CAT but no 2nd sensor it should not effect the efficient running engine. right? If I don't get a CEL by this Friday, driving it every day between now and Friday. Do you think I would be ok to start my weekend project of changing the exhaust?
You could still have a muffler shop wield in o2 bungs on the new pipe just so everything looks and works right. But like others have mentioned, rear o2 is just there to monitor how well the cat is working.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008
  #13  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
I really appreciate everyone's help and input. You've all given me good ideas and a lot to think about before I start my project.
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2008
  #14  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
You can turn the 02 off with a tuner.. you really dont need that 02 from what i have been told.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008
  #15  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
I have a code reader, but it doesn't change programing. Who makes the tuners that do this???
 
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2008
  #16  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
Of course today Friday the check engine light has come on. Will check the code when I get home, but it's probably something to do with the CAT sensor now being hooked up.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2008
  #17  
05Edge-04GT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by bcoverss
I have a code reader, but it doesn't change programing. Who makes the tuners that do this???
SCT and diablosport tuners had that option to turn off the rear 02's. Mine does. Im pretty sure the EPA made them take that option off though.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008
  #18  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
Wow those tuners are quite expensive! I cleared the CEL code which was the error code for the rear O2 sensor. I plugged the O2 sensor back up and tied it to the outside of the exhaust pipe so it would detect heat. Hopefully that will prevent the CEL, I'm to cheap to buy one of those expensive tuners.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008
  #19  
Takeda's Avatar
Level I Supporter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 9
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by bcoverss
Wow those tuners are quite expensive! I cleared the CEL code which was the error code for the rear O2 sensor. I plugged the O2 sensor back up and tied it to the outside of the exhaust pipe so it would detect heat. Hopefully that will prevent the CEL, I'm to cheap to buy one of those expensive tuners.

Sorry, that won't work. The O2 sensors have to be in the exhaust flow inside the exhaust pipe.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008
  #20  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by Takeda
Sorry, that won't work. The O2 sensors have to be in the exhaust flow inside the exhaust pipe.
No, no, no, no, no!~

If you want to run catless (Like I do in my Evo) then simply use 2 spark-plug defoulers to pull the sensor out of the flow so it doesn't smell all of the ****. I have been running this way since the car was 1 week old when I put my catless block-back exhaust on. 13500Miles, no CEL, no codes. Tuners have been doing this for years on turbo-cars.








You can turn off the o2 sensor right at the ECU, but I wouldn't buy a handheld "tuner" - All you need is the software for your ecu and laptop to put it on. Find out what hex address it is.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008
  #21  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
Thanks Jp7, I will give that a try. That looks like my answer without spending a fortune.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008
  #22  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
As you can see from the pictures I have 2 defoulers screwed together on there. I purchased them for about 4 or 5$.

You will need to use a drill press to open the first one up because the nose of your o2 sensor has a bigger diameter than the defouler. I used a 1/2" inch drill bit, and the o2 sensor had a .47" diameter, so it can just barely get any uncatalyzed exhaust.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008
  #23  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
Thanks for the info!!! You all are great! i'm so glad I found this forum.

Will report back with my results. This should do the trick. I picked up a sightly used Flowmaster muffler for $30 to go along with my changes.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008
  #24  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by bcoverss
Thanks for the info!!! You all are great! i'm so glad I found this forum.

Will report back with my results. This should do the trick. I picked up a sightly used Flowmaster muffler for $30 to go along with my changes.
I find it useful to join other forums for vehicles I do not own.

(for example, I joined the honda civic forum, just to find people to buy my LEDs)

You should join a Lancer Evo forum, or a Impreza STI forum if you are looking for ways to get around ECU/EPA stuff. This is how I learned to remove my converter and fool my ecu. Also disabled my EGR as well!
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2008
  #25  
bcoverss's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Central, FL
Back in the days before O2 sensors removing CATs resulted in better MPG's. Has that been your experience with your Evo??
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 PM.