Suspension Tech General discussion of suspension for the Ford Ranger.

D44 HighSteer Arms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #1  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
D44 HighSteer Arms

I am wanting to get my high steer arms so that i can have the knuckles drilled before i put it on the axle for the first time. A few questions

Is there an advantage to having a longer arm? If I got one with double holes it would be longer which i would think that would make it steer easier...

Or doesnt it matter and i can just get a short style and continue to put the tie rod in the stock location...
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #2  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Id go with parts mike highsteer arms. The problem with a two hole is its hard to get your panhard to match up with it, since it connects your draglink so far to the end of the axle. Where as a single hole with the draglink connected to the tie rod will be easyer to match up the panhard.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #3  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
I am going to take my panhard mount will be on the outside of the coil mount. I have a picture of an example but ill have to find it when i get home.

i dont want to use the drag link into the tie rod because i constantly have issues with my current setup and it turning/twisting the tie rod.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #4  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Originally Posted by zabeard
I am going to take my panhard mount will be on the outside of the coil mount. I have a picture of an example but ill have to find it when i get home.

i dont want to use the drag link into the tie rod because i constantly have issues with my current setup and it turning/twisting the tie rod.
Whats wrong with it turing the tierod? it can only turn so far and the joints are made to turn.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #5  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
as it twist that is inacuracy in the steering or delay. at least i think it seems that way. i would also think it wears the TRE out faster. if you try to turn the wheel real hard it will break the JAM nuts loose as well and trust me i tighten those suckers down tight.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #6  
2002FX4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
I don't have to deal with a panhard, but I prefere having the drag link connect to the steering arm rather than the tie rod. it would seem to give much more control of the steering due to the physics, as you are in control of a fixed point as opposed to pushing/pulling in between two points, with less leverage (hope that made sense).

There's parts mike highsteer arms as one option, as well as some available through http://www.ballisticfabrication.com/
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #7  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
That is my thought exactly, and i was looking at either ballistic or mikes
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #8  
Yomie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS
get a 2 hole for the pass side and a 1 hole on the drivers side (or you can get 2 2holes)

Run the draglink to the pass side forward hole and run the tierod to the 2 rear holes.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #9  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Originally Posted by Yomie
get a 2 hole for the pass side and a 1 hole on the drivers side (or you can get 2 2holes)

Run the draglink to the pass side forward hole and run the tierod to the 2 rear holes.
that still leaves him with the problem of getting his panhard to match up to the draglink
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #10  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
this is what i am thinking about for the panhard bar except double shear, ive seen it done on other trucks but this is the only picture i have. ignore the welded highsteer arm. :rollseyes:
 

Last edited by zabeard; Aug 26, 2008 at 09:43 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #11  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by Yomie
get a 2 hole for the pass side and a 1 hole on the drivers side (or you can get 2 2holes)

Run the draglink to the pass side forward hole and run the tierod to the 2 rear holes.

i figured that but does it make it steer easier because its further out from the pivot point?
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #12  
mazda98's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 550
Likes: 1
From: dalton,ga.
Originally Posted by zabeard
as it twist that is inacuracy in the steering or delay. at least i think it seems that way. i would also think it wears the TRE out faster. if you try to turn the wheel real hard it will break the JAM nuts loose as well and trust me i tighten those suckers down tight.
not to mention,i had the tre boot torn off by the tie rod twisting so i had to run my tie rod like rustys says to
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #13  
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 2
From: College Station, TX
Because you're acting on a longer lever arm, you'll be able to apply more torque to the knuckle and it should give you a slight mechanical advantage over the inner hole. The drawback to this is that your wheels won't turn quite as far or as fast for a given steering input.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #14  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
good point, reaction/steering speed is slow and i need a good turning radius as it is. i think i will go with the short ballistic arm with the hardware. its 100 bucks.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #15  
Yomie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS
you are not going to gain any increase in steering with long (2 hole) arms, the outer most hole is the same distance from the balljoint than the stock knuckle hole.

I don't see any problem matching the trac bar with the draglink with a full high steer setup. drop the trac bar mount on the frame side and curve the trac bar over the diff.

Running your drag link to a 'short' arm, or inner hole will cause your knuckles to turn farther than factory specs (assuming you are using some sort of stock steering box) and the axle shaft ears and u-joints to bind causing you to rip off a knuckle. The outer hole is designed for 8" of movement and the inner hole is 6", most steering boxes move 8".

do you see what i'm getting at
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #16  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Originally Posted by Yomie
you are not going to gain any increase in steering with long (2 hole) arms, the outer most hole is the same distance from the balljoint than the stock knuckle hole.

I don't see any problem matching the trac bar with the draglink with a full high steer setup. drop the trac bar mount on the frame side and curve the trac bar over the diff.

Running your drag link to a 'short' arm, or inner hole will cause your knuckles to turn farther than factory specs (assuming you are using some sort of stock steering box) and the axle shaft ears and u-joints to bind causing you to rip off a knuckle. The outer hole is designed for 8" of movement and the inner hole is 6", most steering boxes move 8".

do you see what i'm getting at

its physically impossible to get your panhard to be in the proper position with the two hole system, as you cant mount the panhard off the axle. And steering stops were made adjustable for a reason.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #17  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
does it really matter if its not the same? i mean i have seen a bunch of setups and if the angle is the same and it should swing in the same arc. if you look at jeeps the pitman arm and the frame mount of the panhard do not line up.

I think I am going to give it a shot, if it fails its just a matter of buying that one TRE with the Drag link hole and a shorter tie rod and drag link.

I was out measuring some stuff and I need to have the longer one otherwise there is no way it will fit, since that is the case I am going to get the Parts Mike ones.

also are there any wheel clearance issues with the longer ones? i would assume not because Yomie mentioned its the same length as stock.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #18  
Yomie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS
Originally Posted by redranger4.0
And steering stops were made adjustable for a reason.
Alright smart ***, go ahead and mount your draglink on the inner hole of the high steer arm, when your steering box turns a full 8" stroke and the arm will only go 6" see what happens, especially with hydro assist.


Originally Posted by redranger4.0
its physically impossible to get your panhard to be in the proper position with the two hole system, as you cant mount the panhard off the axle.
thats why you drop the frame side mount

Name:  DSCN2804.jpg
Views: 119
Size:  121.8 KB
Name:  roob078.jpg
Views: 117
Size:  97.0 KB
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #19  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
Originally Posted by Yomie
Alright smart ***, go ahead and mount your draglink on the inner hole of the high steer arm, when your steering box turns a full 8" stroke and the arm will only go 6" see what happens, especially with hydro assist.
I have parts mike SINGLE hole arms on my 44, obviously I havent run it yet as my truck is the longest SAS ever. But Out of the 10 or so people who run 44's in my club not one has a double hole arm. they are all single hole. Steering stops were put on axles for a reason. To limit the steering even though the steering box can go farther. not one of those guys has ever had a problem with them.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blackhawk
Suspension Tech
2
Sep 19, 2008 07:08 AM
Rooks
Drivetrain Tech
20
Nov 9, 2006 03:03 PM
Rooks
Drivetrain Tech
50
Nov 6, 2006 09:47 PM
got-dirty
Drivetrain Tech
36
Nov 5, 2006 12:57 PM
QWIKSNK
Drivetrain Tech
24
Jun 26, 2006 09:05 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:42 AM.