Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech General discussion of wheels and tires for the Ford Ranger.

33's and 4:10 or 4:56?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2013
  #1  
FX403/STX96's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: MI
33's and 4:10 or 4:56?

For those running 33's are you happy with the stock 4:10 gears or wish you had installed 4:56's? I'm thinking 4:56 is the way to go to keep the tires turning in mud/sand and even on the highway. I'm not looking for charts to read, not worried about rpm's or mileage just looking for some real life experience from those that have that combo.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013
  #2  
01RangerEdge's Avatar
Scrambles the DeathDealer
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,579
Likes: 5
From: Jackson, MO
I'm satisfied with my 4.10's for the time being. I'm getting a tuner soon to hold me over until late next year. I'll get 4.56's then
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013
  #3  
Liftedgreen4x4's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: lorton,virginia
4:10's and no complaints here... I haven't really kept track of my mileage after the lift and tires but its not terrible.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013
  #4  
evilclown312's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,772
Likes: 1
From: Logan ohio
I never had a problem with my 4.10's
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013
  #5  
littlered's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 2
From: Lewistown, Mo
since you arent worried about mpg i would go with 4.56. I am currently running 4.88s with 33's and I dont have any problem at all turning all 4 tires due to the locker and l/s, handles hills a lot better, tows better and its fun to drive!
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #6  
vista4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 6
From: Beaver Falls, PA
I like my 4.10s for everyday driving. Off road is ehh.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #7  
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 9
From: Muskegon, Michigan
4.56 all the way. I pull down better mileage with 4.56 and 33's than i did with my 4.10 and 33's. Proper gearing is very important.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #8  
01RangerEdge's Avatar
Scrambles the DeathDealer
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,579
Likes: 5
From: Jackson, MO
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
4.56 all the way. I pull down better mileage with 4.56 and 33's than i did with my 4.10 and 33's. Proper gearing is very important.
Agreed. My mileage sucks now with the 4.10's. The tuner will help, then I can save for the 4.56's
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #9  
vista4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 6
From: Beaver Falls, PA
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
4.56 all the way. I pull down better mileage with 4.56 and 33's than i did with my 4.10 and 33's. Proper gearing is very important.
What kind of milage you get with 4.56s? I dont get too bad with 4.10s bout 18 or so usually.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #10  
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 9
From: Muskegon, Michigan
Originally Posted by vista4.0
What kind of milage you get with 4.56s? I dont get too bad with 4.10s bout 18 or so usually.
Last long trip I took I averaged 18.5 MPG. Best I ever got from my truck, better than I ever did stock was with 4.56 gears and 33's. Averaged 22 MPG's on a 700+ mile trip going 70 all highway.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #11  
wyldechild's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
From: Denver, Colorado
I'm satisfied enough with my 33's and 4.10's. It isn't bad. But 4.56's would be better.

My 91 octane performance tune helps though. I've "raced" an 04 4.0 with 31's and 4.10s from a dead stop to 50 or so. We were pretty even...I had him by maybe half a truck. His was an auto though, which is prob why I had him by a bit.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #12  
logan03CO's Avatar
Member

iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 16
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by wyldechild
I'm satisfied enough with my 33's and 4.10's. It isn't bad. But 4.56's would be better.
x2

I had this some setup for awhile, and had the same experiences. Just get a tuner and leave the regearing until you go over 33's - Then jump right to 4.88's.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #13  
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 9
From: Muskegon, Michigan
Originally Posted by wyldechild
I'm satisfied enough with my 33's and 4.10's. It isn't bad. But 4.56's would be better.

My 91 octane performance tune helps though. I've "raced" an 04 4.0 with 31's and 4.10s from a dead stop to 50 or so. We were pretty even...I had him by maybe half a truck. His was an auto though, which is prob why I had him by a bit.
Originally Posted by logan03CO
x2

I had this some setup for awhile, and had the same experiences. Just get a tuner and leave the regearing until you go over 33's - Then jump right to 4.88's.
I went one better with a tuner AND gears. A tuner helps no doubt but can never take place of proper gearing. My gear swap is one of my best mods I ever did for drive-ability, second would be my custom tunes.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #14  
logan03CO's Avatar
Member

iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 16
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
A tuner helps no doubt but can never take place of proper gearing.
I hear you there. That's why before I put my 35's on, I jumped right to the 4.88's.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #15  
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 9
From: Muskegon, Michigan
Originally Posted by logan03CO
I hear you there. That's why before I put my 35's on, I jumped right to the 4.88's.
Yeah a regear is a definite must with 35's. Thats really the only thing that has kept me from going to 35's, I dont want to regear again, but maybe thats a good thing. lol
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #16  
FULLSCALE's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,184
Likes: 4
From: Clinton, Ontario
I had 4.10s with 33's... no complaints!
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013
  #17  
99offroadrngr's Avatar
TOYOTA
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,713
Likes: 10
From: Massachusetts
i have 4.10 and 33s with a tune. 19.5MPG
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013
  #18  
ranger4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 2
From: cambridge, ontario
never tracked my mileage but 4.10s and 33s are not a problem. my truck never has any power issues on hills, loaded bed, off road. i have not towed with the tires on so i cant make any suggestions there.
i have no problem breaking the rear tires loose on pavement so i dont see any need to regear my truck at this point. i drive all highway everyday now and my fuel economy still seems decent
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2013
  #19  
big-blue-oval's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 457
Likes: 2
From: alberta
I run 33x10.50s with stock 4.10 gearing, and I have no complaints.

Wider tires and wheels would definitely suck the power right out of it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013
  #20  
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 9
From: Muskegon, Michigan
Originally Posted by FULLSCALE
I had 4.10s with 33's... no complaints!
Originally Posted by ranger4.0
never tracked my mileage but 4.10s and 33s are not a problem. my truck never has any power issues on hills, loaded bed, off road. i have not towed with the tires on so i cant make any suggestions there.
i have no problem breaking the rear tires loose on pavement so i dont see any need to regear my truck at this point. i drive all highway everyday now and my fuel economy still seems decent
Originally Posted by big-blue-oval
I run 33x10.50s with stock 4.10 gearing, and I have no complaints.

Wider tires and wheels would definitely suck the power right out of it.
I can pound a nail in with a pair of pliers too, sure it works but it doesnt make it the right tool for the job. lol
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013
  #21  
wyldechild's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
From: Denver, Colorado
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
I can pound a nail in with a pair of pliers too, sure it works but it doesnt make it the right tool for the job. lol
Ha, thats not really a fair comparison. Its better to compare a small hammer that still gets the job done fine...with a bit more work...compared to a big hammer that would make your life easier. The truck is going to work a bit harder...but not to the point that its bad for the truck.

Even a mile above sea level, I have enough power to get around fine. Up at 8k+ feet in the hills...it kinda sucks but is still manageable. Maybe i'm just used to it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013
  #22  
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 9
From: Muskegon, Michigan
Originally Posted by wyldechild
Ha, thats not really a fair comparison. Its better to compare a small hammer that still gets the job done fine...with a bit more work...compared to a big hammer that would make your life easier. The truck is going to work a bit harder...but not to the point that its bad for the truck.

Even a mile above sea level, I have enough power to get around fine. Up at 8k+ feet in the hills...it kinda sucks but is still manageable. Maybe i'm just used to it.
Ha ha ok, maybe not a fair analogy but my point still remains. I had no idea what I was missing until I re geared then I kicked myself for waiting so long!
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013
  #23  
01RangerEdge's Avatar
Scrambles the DeathDealer
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,579
Likes: 5
From: Jackson, MO
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
Ha ha ok, maybe not a fair analogy but my point still remains. I had no idea what I was missing until I re geared then I kicked myself for waiting so long!
I can't wait to regear. My mileage dropped immediately. I need my tuner to get here faster
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013
  #24  
StxDangerRanger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,315
Likes: 8
From: Michigan
I wasn't aware the 4.10's would be that bad on 33's.

What kind of cash did you guys drop on gears if you don't mind telling? I can do it myself, but it seems like it'd be a pain.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013
  #25  
99offroadrngr's Avatar
TOYOTA
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,713
Likes: 10
From: Massachusetts
ringpinion.com

i don't mind 4.10 and 33s. with the 4.0L i can break the rear tires loose on dry pavement without an issue, even on the economy tune.
4.56 would be pretty damn nice though
 

Last edited by 99offroadrngr; Jan 10, 2013 at 07:44 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 AM.