33" or 35's...im so stuck on what i want...
#1
10-03-2005
33" or 35's...im so stuck on what i want...
well my truck is fairly high for just a body lift..compared to some guys out there..having f-150 coils in the rear and 3" out of my torsions... but anyways, i want to fill out my truck better and some guys with 33's just seems like it could go bigger. but also i dont wanna regear or lose lots of flex.
i might get glass fenders...so
dam i hate decisions i cant make, 33's or 35's...oh and they'll be buckshots
i might get glass fenders...so
dam i hate decisions i cant make, 33's or 35's...oh and they'll be buckshots
#2
10-03-2005
Another turncoat Asian tire buyer...oh well. 
If you get 35's you'll certainly want to regear and if you've got 3.73's you'll probably want to even with 33's. Where are you now in terms of gearing?
The one warning about buying any larger tire: once you have them, you can't imagine having anything smaller again, lol. Now I'm on 35's everything else looks small and I have a real resistance to even the idea of going down in size when I think of it. So, just be warned, lol!
If you get 35's you'll certainly want to regear and if you've got 3.73's you'll probably want to even with 33's. Where are you now in terms of gearing?
The one warning about buying any larger tire: once you have them, you can't imagine having anything smaller again, lol. Now I'm on 35's everything else looks small and I have a real resistance to even the idea of going down in size when I think of it. So, just be warned, lol!
#3
10-03-2005
#4
10-03-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Colorado, Lone Tree
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
10-03-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Colorado, Lone Tree
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#8
10-03-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PUEBLO, CO
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
10-03-2005
) , and just happen to be coil over at that...i didnt mean "coils"..sorry 
...more like a helper spring. but yea i cramed em in there 
#12
10-03-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PUEBLO, CO
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wait, you have COILOVERS... On the rear of a STOCK ranger, from an application that DOESNT match?!?!?!?!!?
Thats worse that a honda civic with a huge airplane wing on the back. Useless pointless and no offense to you, dumb...
I would like to see pictures of this though please...
EDIT: BTW, shocks dont determine sag...
Thats worse that a honda civic with a huge airplane wing on the back. Useless pointless and no offense to you, dumb...
I would like to see pictures of this though please...
EDIT: BTW, shocks dont determine sag...
#13
10-03-2005
#15
10-03-2005
^^^ yup very true...thats why im prolly gett'n 33's for now for sure..
well like i said..not coilovers like yer think'n, more like a helper spring...like a dam R/C shock. they are nothing special guys....i needed shocks bad, got em free from a buddy who had em on his ranger.
oh and yes im dum..hah,
i meant..i killed my stockers..so i was so-cal'n around and my quad sank my *** end way to low, so i like the added hieght and load bearing abilities.
heres a pic..ive had em for a long time..though some have you have seen em..they still flex great
well like i said..not coilovers like yer think'n, more like a helper spring...like a dam R/C shock. they are nothing special guys....i needed shocks bad, got em free from a buddy who had em on his ranger.
oh and yes im dum..hah,
i meant..i killed my stockers..so i was so-cal'n around and my quad sank my *** end way to low, so i like the added hieght and load bearing abilities.
heres a pic..ive had em for a long time..though some have you have seen em..they still flex great
#16
10-03-2005
#17
10-03-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PUEBLO, CO
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger_Interceptor
^^^ yup very true...thats why im prolly gett'n 33's for now for sure..
well like i said..not coilovers like yer think'n, more like a helper spring...like a dam R/C shock. they are nothing special guys....i needed shocks bad, got em free from a buddy who had em on his ranger.
oh and yes im dum..hah,
i meant..i killed my stockers..so i was so-cal'n around and my quad sank my *** end way to low, so i like the added hieght and load bearing abilities.
heres a pic..ive had em for a long time..though some have you have seen em..they still flex great
well like i said..not coilovers like yer think'n, more like a helper spring...like a dam R/C shock. they are nothing special guys....i needed shocks bad, got em free from a buddy who had em on his ranger.
oh and yes im dum..hah,
i meant..i killed my stockers..so i was so-cal'n around and my quad sank my *** end way to low, so i like the added hieght and load bearing abilities.
heres a pic..ive had em for a long time..though some have you have seen em..they still flex great
i cant really see em that well...
but if it works i guess. I thought they were full on coilovers...
#18
10-03-2005
Originally Posted by Ranger_Interceptor
i meant..i killed my stockers..so i was so-cal'n around and my quad sank my *** end way to low, so i like the added hieght and load bearing abilities.
#19
10-03-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PUEBLO, CO
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
like gil sayed shocks dont sag your truck they might limit the hight if you put a lift and run stock lenth. but you can take out your shocks and your truck should sit at the same hight it more sounds like your springs are taking a s**t. now granted you might have screwed your shocks but that wont be the case...
well they are more of "helper" coils as he said and I understand. that can aid in retaining the ride height a bit. so i understand where hes comin from. still a little weird but if it works, whats the problem?
#20
10-03-2005
Originally Posted by SUPERGILDO
well they are more of "helper" coils as he said and I understand. that can aid in retaining the ride height a bit. so i understand where hes comin from. still a little weird but if it works, whats the problem?
#21
10-03-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PUEBLO, CO
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
no with his stockers gil he sayed his stockers was sagging the rear end come on follow gilly
yes you are right a little bit BUT...
Originally Posted by RangerInterceptor
i meant..i killed my stockers..so i was so-cal'n around and my quad sank my *** end way to low, so i like the added hieght and load bearing abilities.
follow me zachy...
#22
10-03-2005
#24
10-03-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PUEBLO, CO
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
