2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

ROUSh Cold Air Intake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-09-2007
Brando5105's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ROUSh Cold Air Intake?

Whats the deal with this intake? What makes this different from the stock ones.Roush Intake
 
  #2  
Old 10-09-2007
RangerMuse's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That looks just like the stock one to me!
 
  #3  
Old 10-09-2007
mroctober16's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i might be wrong, but i thought i think it has a cone filter. that box you see is just a heat shield.
 
  #4  
Old 10-10-2007
Silver's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: edenton,nc
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have one and a few other people do to
not bad for the price just replace the cheap paper cone filter

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]
 
  #5  
Old 10-10-2007
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Probably not going to do much for you but look fancy.
 
  #6  
Old 10-10-2007
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Brando5105
What makes this different from the stock ones. Roush Intake
It has no silencing and the fiberglass box has a very large opening to the high pressure area in the front of the truck. By appearances, it should also do a good job of shielding the intake from hot underhood air - probably as good as the stock filter box can. (Many so-called "cold air intakes", especially the cheapies, are exactly the opposite, with little or no shielding to prevent the filter from sucking hot air from the engine compartment.)

BTW, this is not a Roush-designed part. It was originally manufactured by SLP for the 2002/3 limited production Ranger Thunderbolt conversion. Roush bought the leftover parts inventory when production stopped, slapped their labels on the boxes and listed them on their website for large dollars. Later, the surplus was resold to Hillbank Motorsports who sold them primarily on eBay for a fraction of the Roush price. Indications are that ap_liquidators (the current eBay seller) is just another name for Hillbank.

At the time, SLP claimed that their intake and exhaust together made a 15 HP increase over a stock 4.0L (but somewhat less on a 3.0L). When I installed the intake alone on a 4.0L, the WOT intake roar was louder at all speeds and, FWIW, the butt dyno said that acceleration felt a little stronger, especially at highway speeds. I have no data to back that up.

Anyway, it is cheap compared to other intakes and easy enough to install but does require that 2 holes be drilled in the core support for the mounting tabs.

The original paper filter element (P/N P549405-016-190) was made by Donaldson and may no longer be available as a replacement. That shouldn't be a problem though - just swap in a universal nanofiber filter or oiled gauze filter when the time comes. Someone else did research on this and came up with K&N part number #RC-4650. Of course, the total price then roughly doubles which obviously makes it less attractive...
 
  #7  
Old 10-10-2007
Silver's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: edenton,nc
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rwenzing

The original paper filter element (P/N P549405-016-190) was made by Donaldson and may no longer be available as a replacement. That shouldn't be a problem though - just swap in a universal nanofiber filter or oiled gauze filter when the time comes. Someone else did research on this and came up with K&N part number #RC-4650. Of course, the total price then roughly doubles which obviously makes it less attractive...
Correct but you will have to mod the K&N filter because the unit incuding the rubber flange is too long for the intake box
A easy fix with a sharp utility knife just take about a 1" off the bottom rubber flange
At least thats what i did

On a side note if any one wonts my original paper filter just pay shipping
 
  #8  
Old 10-10-2007
Brando5105's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys. So is it a good intake on the cheaper end of the spectrum? Does anyother K&N fit it?
 

Last edited by Brando5105; 10-10-2007 at 10:15 AM.
  #9  
Old 10-10-2007
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What are you trying to accomplish with this intake?
 
  #10  
Old 10-10-2007
Silver's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: edenton,nc
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brando5105
Thanks guys. So is it a good intake on the cheaper end of the spectrum? Does anyother K&N fit it?
the reason i like it is the heat shield

there where a few other elements from K&N that will fit too
check them out here

http://www.knfilters.com/universal/universal.htm
 
  #11  
Old 10-10-2007
Brando5105's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FireRanger
What are you trying to accomplish with this intake?

Maybe a slight increase in gas Mileage, but really just better airflow without being to flashy



BTW what size filter does it take?
 
  #12  
Old 10-17-2007
Brando5105's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: El Cajon, CA
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
anyother info on this intake? to those who have this intake would you reconmend it
 

Last edited by Brando5105; 10-17-2007 at 08:47 PM.
  #13  
Old 12-15-2007
rangeredge_03's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: lubbock,tx
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
does an one have the roush cold air intake ?
 
  #14  
Old 07-11-2008
Hillyard's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Back from the dead!!!!!!!

Since Donaldson no longer makes the paper filter, what are my options for a paper cone filter? I would rather not go with a K&N if I don't have to but it is looking that way.

I went to Autozone and went through all their larger boxes and some guy comes over and said "woah, woah we can look that part number up for you." I replied back "ok" and we went back to the computer. He asked what make model it was from, "I told him it was from a 2003 Ford Ranger SLP." He said I'm not showing a model SLP, and he asked what engine, 3.0. He went over and got the panel filter and said this is what you need. I said well this is what came off of it...lol he said well then we don't have your part...

I tried to explain to him what an SLP was but he didn't care to learn.

I figured you guys might know...
 
  #15  
Old 07-11-2008
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boring, Oregon
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Grab measurements off the filter.....like inlet ID, height, width on the bottom of the element, width at top of element. .......and get an AEM Dryflo.

Also...I felt the most "power" with the stock tube and Thunderbolt/Roush/SLP box. Cool air shielded from the engine heat. I still want to get a custom tube mandrel bent intake tube, so i can run the roush box and a nice uncrushable tube. Would be killer.
 
  #16  
Old 07-11-2008
Silver's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: edenton,nc
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fx4wannabe01
Grab measurements off the filter.....like inlet ID, height, width on the bottom of the element, width at top of element. .......and get an AEM Dryflo.
thats what i did for the k&n replacement




Originally Posted by Fx4wannabe01

Also...I felt the most "power" with the stock tube and Thunderbolt/Roush/SLP box. Cool air shielded from the engine heat.

i say the same thing no matter what others say

Originally Posted by Fx4wannabe01
I still want to get a custom tube mandrel bent intake tube, so i can run the roush box and a nice uncrushable tube. Would be killer.

now that would be cool if you do let me know i may have you make me one too
 
  #17  
Old 07-11-2008
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Boring, Oregon
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
I tried it with my K&N tube......and to make it work, I would need to cut about 1.5" off the tube. And I didn't want to do that. I have yet to try it out on my MAC tube. I wanted to make a AEM/Roush/K&N hybrid. Still might just take the hack saw to them.

Of course....this is on a 4.0 using a 3.0 Roush intake. lol.
 
  #18  
Old 07-11-2008
Hillyard's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would need to get the 2.5" Dryflow Air Filter Short Neck 5" Element 21-201DK.

My concern is that it's only 5" in length compared the the K&Ns 7" length. Do you think it will matter that much?

On the other hand the Donaldson is a weird looking filter anyways.
 
  #19  
Old 07-11-2008
Silver's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: edenton,nc
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fx4wannabe01
I tried it with my K&N tube......and to make it work, I would need to cut about 1.5" off the tube. And I didn't want to do that. I have yet to try it out on my MAC tube. I wanted to make a AEM/Roush/K&N hybrid. Still might just take the hack saw to them.

Of course....this is on a 4.0 using a 3.0 Roush intake. lol.

i was going to try the same thing with my old k&n tube but rather than cutting it up i sold it
Originally Posted by Hillyard
I would need to get the 2.5" Dryflow Air Filter Short Neck 5" Element 21-201DK.

My concern is that it's only 5" in length compared the the K&Ns 7" length. Do you think it will matter that much?

On the other hand the Donaldson is a weird looking filter anyways.
ya i finaly threw out the paper filter after trying to give it away for a year lol

as in the size of the dry flow i dont see a problem with that size due to the old paper one you got with the kit originaly
 
  #20  
Old 08-27-2008
Hillyard's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I got the K&N air filter on and wow it has made a huge difference. The old Donaldson filter was on it's last leg. I could shake the dirt out of it but it didn't have that many miles on it. Hrmph. It didn't look like that great of a filter to begin with but the K&N fills the intake up nicely now.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RangerRunner96
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
5
08-29-2008 01:01 PM
rangeredge_03
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
56
02-05-2008 08:15 PM
RNGMSTR
2.3L & 2.5L I4 Tech
0
03-26-2006 09:54 AM
RicksTJR
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
7
03-21-2006 06:27 AM
04edge
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
5
03-18-2005 09:07 AM



Quick Reply: ROUSh Cold Air Intake?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 PM.