ROUSh Cold Air Intake?
#1
ROUSh Cold Air Intake?
Whats the deal with this intake? What makes this different from the stock ones.Roush Intake
#6
Originally Posted by Brando5105
What makes this different from the stock ones. Roush Intake
BTW, this is not a Roush-designed part. It was originally manufactured by SLP for the 2002/3 limited production Ranger Thunderbolt conversion. Roush bought the leftover parts inventory when production stopped, slapped their labels on the boxes and listed them on their website for large dollars. Later, the surplus was resold to Hillbank Motorsports who sold them primarily on eBay for a fraction of the Roush price. Indications are that ap_liquidators (the current eBay seller) is just another name for Hillbank.
At the time, SLP claimed that their intake and exhaust together made a 15 HP increase over a stock 4.0L (but somewhat less on a 3.0L). When I installed the intake alone on a 4.0L, the WOT intake roar was louder at all speeds and, FWIW, the butt dyno said that acceleration felt a little stronger, especially at highway speeds. I have no data to back that up.
Anyway, it is cheap compared to other intakes and easy enough to install but does require that 2 holes be drilled in the core support for the mounting tabs.
The original paper filter element (P/N P549405-016-190) was made by Donaldson and may no longer be available as a replacement. That shouldn't be a problem though - just swap in a universal nanofiber filter or oiled gauze filter when the time comes. Someone else did research on this and came up with K&N part number #RC-4650. Of course, the total price then roughly doubles which obviously makes it less attractive...
#7
Originally Posted by rwenzing
The original paper filter element (P/N P549405-016-190) was made by Donaldson and may no longer be available as a replacement. That shouldn't be a problem though - just swap in a universal nanofiber filter or oiled gauze filter when the time comes. Someone else did research on this and came up with K&N part number #RC-4650. Of course, the total price then roughly doubles which obviously makes it less attractive...
A easy fix with a sharp utility knife just take about a 1" off the bottom rubber flange
At least thats what i did
On a side note if any one wonts my original paper filter just pay shipping
#10
Originally Posted by Brando5105
Thanks guys. So is it a good intake on the cheaper end of the spectrum? Does anyother K&N fit it?
there where a few other elements from K&N that will fit too
check them out here
http://www.knfilters.com/universal/universal.htm
#11
#14
Back from the dead!!!!!!!
Since Donaldson no longer makes the paper filter, what are my options for a paper cone filter? I would rather not go with a K&N if I don't have to but it is looking that way.
I went to Autozone and went through all their larger boxes and some guy comes over and said "woah, woah we can look that part number up for you." I replied back "ok" and we went back to the computer. He asked what make model it was from, "I told him it was from a 2003 Ford Ranger SLP." He said I'm not showing a model SLP, and he asked what engine, 3.0. He went over and got the panel filter and said this is what you need. I said well this is what came off of it...lol he said well then we don't have your part...
I tried to explain to him what an SLP was but he didn't care to learn.
I figured you guys might know...
Since Donaldson no longer makes the paper filter, what are my options for a paper cone filter? I would rather not go with a K&N if I don't have to but it is looking that way.
I went to Autozone and went through all their larger boxes and some guy comes over and said "woah, woah we can look that part number up for you." I replied back "ok" and we went back to the computer. He asked what make model it was from, "I told him it was from a 2003 Ford Ranger SLP." He said I'm not showing a model SLP, and he asked what engine, 3.0. He went over and got the panel filter and said this is what you need. I said well this is what came off of it...lol he said well then we don't have your part...
I tried to explain to him what an SLP was but he didn't care to learn.
I figured you guys might know...
#15
Grab measurements off the filter.....like inlet ID, height, width on the bottom of the element, width at top of element. .......and get an AEM Dryflo.
Also...I felt the most "power" with the stock tube and Thunderbolt/Roush/SLP box. Cool air shielded from the engine heat. I still want to get a custom tube mandrel bent intake tube, so i can run the roush box and a nice uncrushable tube. Would be killer.
Also...I felt the most "power" with the stock tube and Thunderbolt/Roush/SLP box. Cool air shielded from the engine heat. I still want to get a custom tube mandrel bent intake tube, so i can run the roush box and a nice uncrushable tube. Would be killer.
#16
i say the same thing no matter what others say
now that would be cool if you do let me know i may have you make me one too
#17
I tried it with my K&N tube......and to make it work, I would need to cut about 1.5" off the tube. And I didn't want to do that. I have yet to try it out on my MAC tube. I wanted to make a AEM/Roush/K&N hybrid. Still might just take the hack saw to them.
Of course....this is on a 4.0 using a 3.0 Roush intake. lol.
Of course....this is on a 4.0 using a 3.0 Roush intake. lol.
#18
#19
I tried it with my K&N tube......and to make it work, I would need to cut about 1.5" off the tube. And I didn't want to do that. I have yet to try it out on my MAC tube. I wanted to make a AEM/Roush/K&N hybrid. Still might just take the hack saw to them.
Of course....this is on a 4.0 using a 3.0 Roush intake. lol.
Of course....this is on a 4.0 using a 3.0 Roush intake. lol.
i was going to try the same thing with my old k&n tube but rather than cutting it up i sold it
as in the size of the dry flow i dont see a problem with that size due to the old paper one you got with the kit originaly
#20
I got the K&N air filter on and wow it has made a huge difference. The old Donaldson filter was on it's last leg. I could shake the dirt out of it but it didn't have that many miles on it. Hrmph. It didn't look like that great of a filter to begin with but the K&N fills the intake up nicely now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RangerRunner96
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
5
08-29-2008 01:01 PM