Rear axel replacements options
#29
Originally Posted by 034x4
Wait, your saying 35x12.50's are pizza cutters!?!?!???
I have 38x12.50's...THOSE are pizza cutters.
I have 38x12.50's...THOSE are pizza cutters.
#30
Originally Posted by SUPERGILDO
they are not dana axles. ford axles are not made by dana and dan are not made by ford. they have no affiliation. Although dana/spicer is used in pretty much every OE vehicle, a lot of the times manufaturers will use their own rear axles...
Originally Posted by 034x4
8.8.
9".
Dana 60.
Dana 70.
Corporate 14 bolt.
Rockwells.
I know i didn't mention alot, but i listed the ford axles, and then the axles stronger than them in that order.
9".
Dana 60.
Dana 70.
Corporate 14 bolt.
Rockwells.
I know i didn't mention alot, but i listed the ford axles, and then the axles stronger than them in that order.
Oh ok, where does like a dana 35 and dana 44 fit in.
#33
#34
#35
#38
#41
Originally Posted by Ranger1
and the stupid hybrid D30/28 thing we have must be even weaker then the D35. Man what was ford thinking using that POS hybrid thing when we have a pretty tough 8.8 in the back. That just doesn't make any sense to me.
But ultimately, whaddayah want for < $20k?
They were probably looking at their marketing research when they made that decision. They probably realized that 98% of Ranger owners only wanted a powered front axle to get their sorry asses out of snow banks and maybe up an occasional loose incline.. It should be painfully obvious that the Ranger is not designed to be a massivly heavy duty truck (for that look to the SuperDuty series), nor is it designed to be a uber-capable off-roader (Ford doesn't seem to cater to this market these days).
Quite simply you get what you pay for!
Last edited by NHBubba_Revisited; 11-14-2005 at 02:32 PM.
#42
oh my bad yeah Dana 35/28 hybrid is what we have. I guess I have a "things always get better" moto when it comes to cars and technology in general, and I can't say the newer trucks are better then the old TTB trucks. Maybe some aspects the newer trucks are better but as far as how much you can mod them and the options(aftermarket) availible they are not. I realize the ranger is not meant to be a heavy duty truck but they could have at least put a true D35 up front on at least some model(like the TTB trucks some had the 30/28 hybrid and some had a true 35 and it was easy to go to a D44).
Maybe if the aftermarket for the newer rangers would pick up I would have less to complain about. If moroso or somebody would make a more heavy duty front axel shafts and somebody would make a bolt in dana 44 upgrade. You would not hear me complain.
Maybe if the aftermarket for the newer rangers would pick up I would have less to complain about. If moroso or somebody would make a more heavy duty front axel shafts and somebody would make a bolt in dana 44 upgrade. You would not hear me complain.
#43
#45
#46
Originally Posted by 034x4
if you are swapping in axles and you look at anything less than a d44, i will slap you.
8.8 > d44
true d35's are only rear axles. The dana 30 is the front. 30's are stonger than 35's (ironically).
8.8 > d44
true d35's are only rear axles. The dana 30 is the front. 30's are stonger than 35's (ironically).
#47
Originally Posted by Big04Ranger
dana 35s are almost the same as a 7.5. and a D44 is similar to a 8.8
the year explorer that you want for disk brakes is 95-01.. i have a 91-94 style in my garage but its drum brakes.. im thinkin bout sellin it as i need the $$ i also have a dana 35 TTB that im gonna sell as well
the year explorer that you want for disk brakes is 95-01.. i have a 91-94 style in my garage but its drum brakes.. im thinkin bout sellin it as i need the $$ i also have a dana 35 TTB that im gonna sell as well
#49
After the problems I've had, I can't believe I'm about to defend Ford and the Ranger..
How about the fact that steering and road handling is far far better. How about the fact that camber doesn't go to hell as the suspension sags, causing unequal, premature tire wear. How about the fact that you can one finger your way down the interstate w/ IFS. Good luck doing that w/ TTB. I hear it's hell, relatively speaking.
Don't get me wrong, I'd have gone for a solid front myself, if I had the choice. In my mind it's more resiliant to damage and easier to maintain. But we'd have to take the downsides w/ that. And those downsides are an adverse effect on handling, and certianly a pretty sizable jump in vehicle costs. The torsion bar IFS system we have on the front ends of our Rangers is compact, handles fairly well, and is relatively cheap. That yeilds an affordable compact truck w/ decent road maners. You've got to give the system credit for what it yeilds. It isn't a complete 'POS'..
Besides, has yours given you any problems? Mine hasn't. While I have seen a guy grenade a hybrid D35 front diff, I'm still not convinced he didn't earn it. He hit that hole pretty damn hard from where I was sitting!
I don't know how you can blame Ford for the aftermarket options. I mean if aftermarket support was of higher priority, you probably should have bought a Jeep.
Easy to go to a D44?! Is that possible? Is there a D44 IFS system? And what would having a 'true' D35 front have bought you? Additional locker options? I'm not even sure that's the case. (Someone please comment on this!)
Truth be told I'm kind of surprised there isn't a greater aftermarket for the Ranger. It seems the 90's X gets a helluva lot more attention here than the Ranger does. I can only assume that that is because there are more X's out there. Or maybe more X owners are interested in modifying them. I am relatively confident that 90% of the Ranger owners out there have no interest in substantial power-train mods. I can only reason that that's why aftermarket makers don't pay careful attention to the Ranger. Although it's still surprising as there are so many Rangers out there.
That said, I bet the real money is in the full-size market.. so I bet that's where the attention goes.
Originally Posted by Ranger1
I guess I have a "things always get better" moto when it comes to cars and technology in general, and I can't say the newer trucks are better then the old TTB trucks.
Don't get me wrong, I'd have gone for a solid front myself, if I had the choice. In my mind it's more resiliant to damage and easier to maintain. But we'd have to take the downsides w/ that. And those downsides are an adverse effect on handling, and certianly a pretty sizable jump in vehicle costs. The torsion bar IFS system we have on the front ends of our Rangers is compact, handles fairly well, and is relatively cheap. That yeilds an affordable compact truck w/ decent road maners. You've got to give the system credit for what it yeilds. It isn't a complete 'POS'..
Besides, has yours given you any problems? Mine hasn't. While I have seen a guy grenade a hybrid D35 front diff, I'm still not convinced he didn't earn it. He hit that hole pretty damn hard from where I was sitting!
Originally Posted by Ranger1
Maybe some aspects the newer trucks are better but as far as how much you can mod them and the options(aftermarket) availible they are not.
Originally Posted by Ranger1
I realize the ranger is not meant to be a heavy duty truck but they could have at least put a true D35 up front on at least some model(like the TTB trucks some had the 30/28 hybrid and some had a true 35 and it was easy to go to a D44).
Originally Posted by Ranger1
Maybe if the aftermarket for the newer rangers would pick up I would have less to complain about.
That said, I bet the real money is in the full-size market.. so I bet that's where the attention goes.
#50
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
TTB isnt that bad, as long as everything in the front is tight. adding a lift and aggresive driving it gets worse.
i can steer down the interstate one fingered without major issues (the mudders like to follow the ruts in the road) and the allignment is pretty good. the toe likes to go out more than camber. installing camber adjusting bushing allivates that issue for the most part.
the TTB does ride 10x BETTER than the torsion bar IFS and, IMO, is able to withstand more abuse than the t-bar IFS in most cases.
i can steer down the interstate one fingered without major issues (the mudders like to follow the ruts in the road) and the allignment is pretty good. the toe likes to go out more than camber. installing camber adjusting bushing allivates that issue for the most part.
the TTB does ride 10x BETTER than the torsion bar IFS and, IMO, is able to withstand more abuse than the t-bar IFS in most cases.