General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

New Truck??? (pics!!!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-03-2007
BB2's Avatar
BB2
BB2 is offline
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Truck??? (pics!!!)

I work at a car dealership and we just got a great trade in. It is a 99 ranger, 3.0 or 4.0, dunno, auto, 3 inch body lift and 31 inch thornturds which are completly bald! Anyhow, it runs and looks good, so I thought, hey maybe I'll get this. I don't know what engine it has, I'm thinking the 3.0 but either way I took a pic so you guys could possibly tell me what it is. What would you pay for a truck like this? It has 91000 miles on it. I was told that the price is gonna be close to 6000 bucks! I don't have that and I personally don't think it is worth it. Let me know what you think!

Name:  022707_1715a.jpg
Views: 42
Size:  37.2 KB

Name:  022707_1715b.jpg
Views: 34
Size:  33.8 KB

Name:  030207_1620a2.jpg
Views: 42
Size:  42.7 KB

Name:  030207_1738a.jpg
Views: 26
Size:  16.7 KB

Name:  030207_2057a.jpg
Views: 57
Size:  48.6 KB

Name:  030207_2057b.jpg
Views: 39
Size:  46.1 KB

Name:  030207_2058a.jpg
Views: 42
Size:  56.5 KB

Name:  030307_1242a.jpg
Views: 54
Size:  42.7 KB
And on another note, my buddy got his b2 stuck in the snow last night. Didn't get home till 1:30, then I got up and went back to work to finish detailing "my" truck or the ranger! LOL!

Name:  030307_0023a.jpg
Views: 28
Size:  67.7 KB
 
  #2  
Old 03-03-2007
gumby's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: indy
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats a 3.0
 
  #3  
Old 03-03-2007
evnmn3's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^I agree

And honestly, I dont think its worth it.
 
  #4  
Old 03-03-2007
ScottG's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lewiston, Maine
Posts: 4,926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, i wouldnt pay 6k for that
 
  #5  
Old 03-03-2007
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
depending on the motor somewhere around $4500 and btw where is the tailgate?
 
  #6  
Old 03-03-2007
jtslmn720's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent State, Kent Ohio
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
i paid 6k out the door for mine 18 months ago for basically the same truck with 20k less miles..only mines 2wd so i dont think its worth it...
 
  #7  
Old 03-03-2007
BigRed911's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to work at car dealership, and if they are telling you that they are selling it for 6k, that only means that they took it in for like 3k. So before you buy it, talk to your manager and ask what they took it in for and just pay that.

Its a sweet truck, but better meats on there and nicer rims and you are golden...Good luck
 
  #8  
Old 03-03-2007
IronRanger92's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
around here it is.. i could get close to 8k for mine on the front lot at the dealership, and i have 150k miles.. thats someone who just wanted a 4x4 ranger
 
  #9  
Old 03-03-2007
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Charlestown, IN
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
depending on the motor somewhere around $4500 and btw where is the tailgate?
i was wondering the same thing....i wouldn't pay that!
 
  #10  
Old 03-03-2007
Freelander's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I paid 6K for a 98 version of that truck, with 30,000 less miles and a 4.0. I don't really think it's worth that. Plus that BL and bald 31's should bring the price down even more.
 
  #12  
Old 03-03-2007
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Demorest,Ga
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bought my 00 6 months ago for 5600 after tax......4cyl and 138k miles on it when I bought it.........it was exactly what I wanted, thats why I paid more for it.......if it was just a regular ranger with a color like white or something, I wouldn't have bought it for that much.
 
  #13  
Old 03-03-2007
BB2's Avatar
BB2
BB2 is offline
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I'm just gonna hold off and look around, unless he offers like 3000 or 3500. Then I may change my mine. It is exactly what I want except no, 4.0 or 5 speed. My parents woln't let me lift my b2, and wouldn't let me lift a ranger if I got one. But will let me buy this already lifted one, go figure. Oh, yeah, it has a tailgate, the guy who had it had a net tailgate on it and took it with him. The one hinge for the tailgate is off, we have it, but we don't have the "nut" that holds the hinge to the truck, we have bolts, no nuts or whatever is back there. It needs a new tailgate though, it musta started eating out and he painted it primer, we painted it green where he had primer, looks okay from a distance. I'd probly go to a junkyard to get one or just a net would be fine. I wouldn't be doing much heavy hauling to need a tailgate, would be nice to have one though. So I'm off ranger hunting tomorrow, 4.0, 5 speed, 4x4 and what are the best gears they came with? I'm guessing 4.10 L/S, like the b2s?
 
  #14  
Old 03-04-2007
FMD's Avatar
FMD
FMD is offline
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Amherst NY
Posts: 3,873
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
my understanding is the 3.55's are for pure power but lot lest mpg, and the 4.10s give u slightly less power yet MUCH better mpg
 
  #15  
Old 03-04-2007
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i would only pay 4000 for that since its only got the 3.0
 
  #16  
Old 03-04-2007
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by FMD
my understanding is the 3.55's are for pure power but lot lest mpg, and the 4.10s give u slightly less power yet MUCH better mpg
WHAT...... um no.... 3.55 is for better MPG and less power off the line... and 4.10 is better responce but less MPG... wtf are you thinking...
 
  #17  
Old 03-04-2007
IronRanger92's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
WHAT...... um no.... 3.55 is for better MPG and less power off the line... and 4.10 is better responce but less MPG... wtf are you thinking...
agreed.. night and day difference in my truck compared to my moms.. 4.10s in mine, 3.73s in hers.. mine will burn the back tire off and get up and go, hers kinda.. eh
 
  #18  
Old 03-04-2007
franger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: litchfield,ct
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wouldnt pay 6 for that. mine is a 99 reg cab 3.0 4x4 offroad, and when i got it it had 100k on it, and i paid 4000 and it was in mint condition. but that does look like a nice clean truck, and if i read your post correctly, you did say the tires were bald? this could mean there was a lot of tire spinning action which would lead me to believe that this truck has suffered some sort of abuse.

anyways, good luck
mike
 
  #19  
Old 03-04-2007
BB2's Avatar
BB2
BB2 is offline
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, the tires are bald, but they are severly cupped. It needs aligned like I need to win the lottery! They are thornturds as well, suck on and off road and wear like its going out of style. I'd get some bfgs or something. I've never seen that truck covered in mud when the previous owner had it. It may have been beat, but it still runs good and looks good, I'll think about it. And yes, 6000 is way too much, I wouldn't pay anymore than 4000.
 
  #20  
Old 03-04-2007
SHOman86's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lakeland, Fl
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
u mean to tell me u work at the dealer and they wouldnt give it to u at cost? wow that sucks. i work at a dealer and anything we get i can get at cost. we have a few rangers...nice ones at that. but with me havin a kid on the way i would have one. i would have a 05 black fx4 rockin some mt classic IIs but then again its not worth it to trade it for a family sedan plus i need something good with gas. back on topic no its not worth 6k
 
  #21  
Old 03-04-2007
MonsterGuy's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
WHAT...... um no.... 3.55 is for better MPG and less power off the line... and 4.10 is better responce but less MPG... wtf are you thinking...
also agree with zach!
 
  #22  
Old 03-04-2007
BB2's Avatar
BB2
BB2 is offline
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I went truck shopping today and found nothing in my price range that was worth looking at. But, I did continue my search tonight on the internet, after a well diserved nap, and I found one of the nicest done rangers I have ever seen in my life. I think I might call tomorrow to find out more about it. I still think that 5000 for a 96 is a little high as well. Why am I finding all these sweet trucks that are overpiced! Grrrrr!

Anyhow, here is the link to the truck. Nobody better buy it! Unless they plan on giving it to me! LOL! Thanks for all the responses!

http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.jsp?car_id=218282537&dealer_id=54250377&car_ye ar=1996&model=RANGER&num_records=25&make2=&start_y ear=1981&keywordsfyc=&keywordsrep=&engine=6+Cylind er&certified=&body_code=32&fuel=Gasoline&search_ty pe=both&distance=300&make=FORD&color=&min_price=0& body_style=TRUCKS&drive=4+wheel+drive&default_sort =priceDESC&max_mileage=&style_flag=2&sort_type=pri ceDESC&address=16830&advanced=y&end_year=2007&door s=&transmission=Manual&max_price=6000&cardist=243
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chris98
Snapshots
16
10-17-2012 06:57 AM
Downey
Snapshots
13
03-01-2011 08:49 PM
dcrymes99ranger
Meet & Greet Photos
11
03-09-2010 05:09 PM
Rosemont
General Ford Ranger Discussion
25
10-10-2005 09:40 PM



Quick Reply: New Truck??? (pics!!!)



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 PM.