General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

Thinking about going back to stock height

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #1  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
Thinking about going back to stock height

Any thoughts? It's a 35 minute drive to get to work and the mileage sucks with the bigger tires so I don't drive my truck any. I have a Saturn as a DD but when I go back home I don't trust driving it. Right now I just have a body lift and 32's with 4.10 gears. I still have my 3.73 rear end so I can put that back in. Just don't know what kind of rims to run if I do go stock. Any ideas?

 
Attached Thumbnails Thinking about going back to stock height-img_20120520_162521.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #2  
wyldechild's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
From: Denver, Colorado
Leave it. The few extra MPG's isn't worth compromising the look IMO. Get a tuner and try to get some better MPGs out of it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #3  
Mcleary316's Avatar
Member

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 2
From: Lawrence, Kansas
Yeah if you own a ranger don't expect it to be a great dd as far as milage goes. Just keep the look.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #4  
timbits588's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: buffalo, ny
i say keep it. i think it looks really good. did you keep track of your mileage before the switch? how far off is it?
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #5  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
I was getting 21 stock. I get 15 now which I was fine with but now I have to drive so far to get anywhere down here.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #6  
timbits588's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: buffalo, ny
oh yeah that's definitely a drop. i guess I would sit down and do some calculations. if the gas savings comes out to be substantial, then i guess you gotta do what's best for you
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #7  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
I love the way it looks, believe me. I just am wanting to get my mileage back and reduce the wear and tear. It eats ball joints.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #8  
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 1
From: Madison. AL
.
Originally Posted by wyldechild
Leave it. The few extra MPG's isn't worth compromising the look IMO. Get a tuner and try to get some better MPGs out of it.
Originally Posted by Mcleary316
Yeah if you own a ranger don't expect it to be a great dd as far as milage goes. Just keep the look.
Not true at all. I'm avg 26mpg with a 2.3 auto 4.10 gears right now. going back stock will make a BIG difference.

4cyl rangers can and do get good mpg stock or lowered. However the 3.0's and 4.0's will see minimal gains going from lifted to stock. I've owned all 3 engines included the old 2.3 and the new 2.3.

4.0 stock I got about 16-17 around town and lifted on 33's I got about 13-15mpg

3.0 stock I got 17-20mpg and lifted on 33's I got 15-17mpg.

With the older 2.3/2.5 you will likely avg around 20-24mpg, but with the new 2.3 duratec you can see as good as low to mid 30's stock. Lowest I have seen with my mazda was 22mpg avg on stock size tires.


To the OP if you want to go stock I say go stock and lower it. It would be a nice looking truck lowered and you can have more fun with it that way and probably be able to save for a 4x4 beater.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #9  
99offroadrngr's Avatar
TOYOTA
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,713
Likes: 10
From: Massachusetts
i average 19.5 on econ tune on 33s but I can imagine with a 4cyl its probably pretty sluggish and requires higher RPMs. If you set it to stock height, I agree with Mike. Lower it!
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #10  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
Saving up for newer F150 or stroker since the job is paying good :)

It will go to stock for the time being. Then maybe lower. I always told myself though I wouldn't have a lowered truck but if I get my F150 then it will be the DD. Any ideas on rims that would look good stock and then lowered if I go to it? Thinking something black. Tired of cleaning chrome.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #11  
99offroadrngr's Avatar
TOYOTA
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,713
Likes: 10
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by robert99ranger
Saving up for newer F150 or stroker since the job is paying good :)

It will go to stock for the time being. Then maybe lower. I always told myself though I wouldn't have a lowered truck but if I get my F150 then it will be the DD. Any ideas on rims that would look good stock and then lowered if I go to it? Thinking something black. Tired of cleaning chrome.
I like staggered FR500s

yeah but if you want black...

 

Last edited by 99offroadrngr; Nov 20, 2012 at 08:10 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #12  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
These
17x9 Fr500 Mustang wheels w/ tires
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #13  
wyldechild's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
From: Denver, Colorado
Originally Posted by Sonic04Edge
.



Not true at all. I'm avg 26mpg with a 2.3 auto 4.10 gears right now. going back stock will make a BIG difference.

4cyl rangers can and do get good mpg stock or lowered. However the 3.0's and 4.0's will see minimal gains going from lifted to stock. I've owned all 3 engines included the old 2.3 and the new 2.3.

4.0 stock I got about 16-17 around town and lifted on 33's I got about 13-15mpg

3.0 stock I got 17-20mpg and lifted on 33's I got 15-17mpg.

With the older 2.3/2.5 you will likely avg around 20-24mpg, but with the new 2.3 duratec you can see as good as low to mid 30's stock. Lowest I have seen with my mazda was 22mpg avg on stock size tires.


To the OP if you want to go stock I say go stock and lower it. It would be a nice looking truck lowered and you can have more fun with it that way and probably be able to save for a 4x4 beater.
What's not true about what I said? I gave my opinion. There's no true or false about it.

Imo, sell the unreliable dd car and use the money for gas money. The truck looks good the way it is.

At least lower it! Stock is boring lol
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #14  
dixie_boysles's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 6
From: NC
leave it alone
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #15  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
Well the dd was free and it gets 34 mpg. It fine back and forth to work but its to much on it to drive it on long trips. It drank a quart in 1000 miles.

2/3 or 4/5?
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012
  #16  
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 1
From: Madison. AL
Originally Posted by wyldechild
What's not true about what I said? I gave my opinion. There's no true or false about it.

Imo, sell the unreliable dd car and use the money for gas money. The truck looks good the way it is.

At least lower it! Stock is boring lol
I didn't quote just you, but you did say a few(few means 2-3) wouldn't be worth it. However with him having a 4cyl it can make a much larger difference compared to doing it to a 3.0 or 4.0. Those would only gain a few in return. However if he lowered it he could see upwards to a 10-12mpg difference. He's getting 15mpg on 32's and going to a 25-26" tire on a 17" wheels will change the entire truck between mpgs and the way the truck drives.

Mcleary was the main one I was talking to. He said "if you drive a ranger dont expect good mpg dd" Which is wrong. With my 2.3 duratec with automatic and 4.10 gears I avg 26mpg and last time I checked that's pretty good dd mpg. If it was a 5spd I'd see even better out of it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012
  #17  
dixie_boysles's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,779
Likes: 6
From: NC
just buy you a beater and leave the truck alone!
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012
  #18  
98liftedranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,538
Likes: 4
From: California
I say leave it alone. Drive the ranger on the long trips or like others have said sell the saturn and just drive the ranger. Take the money from selling the car and get a tuner or a regear and you'll be good to go.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012
  #19  
wyldechild's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
From: Denver, Colorado
You should sell the car anyway and paint that powerdome to match!!!!
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012
  #20  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
It's getting painted. Been looking at places around here in Memphis to get it done. Just been waiting for harvest to get over with.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012
  #21  
Wingman108's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 382
Likes: 1
From: Burlington, MA
Originally Posted by 98liftedranger
I say leave it alone. Drive the ranger on the long trips or like others have said sell the saturn and just drive the ranger. Take the money from selling the car and get a tuner or a regear and you'll be good to go.
^ Ditto. and straighten that bumper out :P

Originally Posted by 99offroadrngr
I like staggered FR500s

Although this would look awesome too, but it involves a lot of work taking a body lift off. I would love a slammed 2wd with the fr500's.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012
  #22  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
I got a different bumper.

It wasn't hard putting the lift on. I helped put the lowering kit on the truck pictured so I know what that involves. I just need the time and space to do the stuff more than anything.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012
  #23  
01RangerEdge's Avatar
Scrambles the DeathDealer
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,579
Likes: 5
From: Jackson, MO
I've actually wanted to get a Saturn to DD to work, instead I'm getting a lift for the Ranger. I might still get one next spring.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012
  #24  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
Its not a fancy car at all but I get 34 mpg out of it and it rides decent. My dad gave it to me so can't beat that.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2012
  #25  
robert99ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
You think I would get mileage back if I dropped it to 4.56? I have 4.10 now and I have a hard time holding 70 going up a hill.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.