Thinking about going back to stock height
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
Thinking about going back to stock height
Any thoughts? It's a 35 minute drive to get to work and the mileage sucks with the bigger tires so I don't drive my truck any. I have a Saturn as a DD but when I go back home I don't trust driving it. Right now I just have a body lift and 32's with 4.10 gears. I still have my 3.73 rear end so I can put that back in. Just don't know what kind of rims to run if I do go stock. Any ideas?
.
Not true at all. I'm avg 26mpg with a 2.3 auto 4.10 gears right now. going back stock will make a BIG difference.
4cyl rangers can and do get good mpg stock or lowered. However the 3.0's and 4.0's will see minimal gains going from lifted to stock. I've owned all 3 engines included the old 2.3 and the new 2.3.
4.0 stock I got about 16-17 around town and lifted on 33's I got about 13-15mpg
3.0 stock I got 17-20mpg and lifted on 33's I got 15-17mpg.
With the older 2.3/2.5 you will likely avg around 20-24mpg, but with the new 2.3 duratec you can see as good as low to mid 30's stock. Lowest I have seen with my mazda was 22mpg avg on stock size tires.
To the OP if you want to go stock I say go stock and lower it. It would be a nice looking truck lowered and you can have more fun with it that way and probably be able to save for a 4x4 beater.
4cyl rangers can and do get good mpg stock or lowered. However the 3.0's and 4.0's will see minimal gains going from lifted to stock. I've owned all 3 engines included the old 2.3 and the new 2.3.
4.0 stock I got about 16-17 around town and lifted on 33's I got about 13-15mpg
3.0 stock I got 17-20mpg and lifted on 33's I got 15-17mpg.
With the older 2.3/2.5 you will likely avg around 20-24mpg, but with the new 2.3 duratec you can see as good as low to mid 30's stock. Lowest I have seen with my mazda was 22mpg avg on stock size tires.
To the OP if you want to go stock I say go stock and lower it. It would be a nice looking truck lowered and you can have more fun with it that way and probably be able to save for a 4x4 beater.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
Saving up for newer F150 or stroker since the job is paying good :)
It will go to stock for the time being. Then maybe lower. I always told myself though I wouldn't have a lowered truck but if I get my F150 then it will be the DD. Any ideas on rims that would look good stock and then lowered if I go to it? Thinking something black. Tired of cleaning chrome.
It will go to stock for the time being. Then maybe lower. I always told myself though I wouldn't have a lowered truck but if I get my F150 then it will be the DD. Any ideas on rims that would look good stock and then lowered if I go to it? Thinking something black. Tired of cleaning chrome.
Saving up for newer F150 or stroker since the job is paying good :)
It will go to stock for the time being. Then maybe lower. I always told myself though I wouldn't have a lowered truck but if I get my F150 then it will be the DD. Any ideas on rims that would look good stock and then lowered if I go to it? Thinking something black. Tired of cleaning chrome.
It will go to stock for the time being. Then maybe lower. I always told myself though I wouldn't have a lowered truck but if I get my F150 then it will be the DD. Any ideas on rims that would look good stock and then lowered if I go to it? Thinking something black. Tired of cleaning chrome.
yeah but if you want black...
Last edited by 99offroadrngr; Nov 20, 2012 at 08:10 AM.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
.
Not true at all. I'm avg 26mpg with a 2.3 auto 4.10 gears right now. going back stock will make a BIG difference.
4cyl rangers can and do get good mpg stock or lowered. However the 3.0's and 4.0's will see minimal gains going from lifted to stock. I've owned all 3 engines included the old 2.3 and the new 2.3.
4.0 stock I got about 16-17 around town and lifted on 33's I got about 13-15mpg
3.0 stock I got 17-20mpg and lifted on 33's I got 15-17mpg.
With the older 2.3/2.5 you will likely avg around 20-24mpg, but with the new 2.3 duratec you can see as good as low to mid 30's stock. Lowest I have seen with my mazda was 22mpg avg on stock size tires.
To the OP if you want to go stock I say go stock and lower it. It would be a nice looking truck lowered and you can have more fun with it that way and probably be able to save for a 4x4 beater.
Not true at all. I'm avg 26mpg with a 2.3 auto 4.10 gears right now. going back stock will make a BIG difference.
4cyl rangers can and do get good mpg stock or lowered. However the 3.0's and 4.0's will see minimal gains going from lifted to stock. I've owned all 3 engines included the old 2.3 and the new 2.3.
4.0 stock I got about 16-17 around town and lifted on 33's I got about 13-15mpg
3.0 stock I got 17-20mpg and lifted on 33's I got 15-17mpg.
With the older 2.3/2.5 you will likely avg around 20-24mpg, but with the new 2.3 duratec you can see as good as low to mid 30's stock. Lowest I have seen with my mazda was 22mpg avg on stock size tires.
To the OP if you want to go stock I say go stock and lower it. It would be a nice looking truck lowered and you can have more fun with it that way and probably be able to save for a 4x4 beater.
Imo, sell the unreliable dd car and use the money for gas money. The truck looks good the way it is.
At least lower it! Stock is boring lol
Mcleary was the main one I was talking to. He said "if you drive a ranger dont expect good mpg dd" Which is wrong. With my 2.3 duratec with automatic and 4.10 gears I avg 26mpg and last time I checked that's pretty good dd mpg. If it was a 5spd I'd see even better out of it.
I say leave it alone. Drive the ranger on the long trips or like others have said sell the saturn and just drive the ranger. Take the money from selling the car and get a tuner or a regear and you'll be good to go.
Although this would look awesome too, but it involves a lot of work taking a body lift off. I would love a slammed 2wd with the fr500's.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
I got a different bumper.
It wasn't hard putting the lift on. I helped put the lowering kit on the truck pictured so I know what that involves. I just need the time and space to do the stuff more than anything.
It wasn't hard putting the lift on. I helped put the lowering kit on the truck pictured so I know what that involves. I just need the time and space to do the stuff more than anything.







