2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Best Tuner for the 3.0 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2011
  #1  
d1zturbe3d's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: California
Best Tuner for the 3.0 ?

Hey guys I tried to do a search for tuners for the 3.0 but they were mostly older threads so I decided to try asking in a new one. First of all will getting a tuner for the 3.0 really make a noticeable difference? If so, What is the best tuner for the 3.0 out there ? those of you that have a tuner for the 3.0 what are your experiences?
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2011
  #2  
always dirty's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: stockton ca
Honestly, I wished I had saved my money. Its nice to be able to read codes and customize a few of the parameters, but I didnt notice that much of a difference, reguarding power and mpg.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2011
  #3  
d1zturbe3d's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: California
Damn really?
What tuner did you use and do you have a 3.0?
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2011
  #4  
Prerunner-Ranger's Avatar
Level I Supporter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 4
From: Lancaster, CA.
Go with Fred @ Rogue, his tunes rock.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2011
  #5  
d1zturbe3d's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: California
Do the tunes actually make a significant difference compared to stock ? I just want to be sure it's worth it before I drop that kind of money on a mod. What have you noticed after the tune?
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2011
  #6  
duuugh's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: PA
My buddy just got a Bully Dog for his 2004 F-150 and he loves it. Got 3 settings added power he didnt realize any difference in mpg though.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2011
  #7  
99offroadrngr's Avatar
TOYOTA
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,713
Likes: 10
From: Massachusetts
SCT Xcal3
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2011
  #8  
always dirty's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: stockton ca
Ive got the SCT x cal 2, bought it a few years ago. On a stock engine it may make a difference. I purchased it after I did underdrive pullies and a K&N FIPK system, so its hard to pinpoint. The readings from the butt dyno werent that impressive though. I know opinions are like ********, but Id suggest spending the cash on bolt ons before I bought the X cal. Fyi, Ive got a 3.0, ext cab, 2wd 5 speed.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2011
  #9  
d1zturbe3d's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: California
My truck is pretty much stock except for a thrush welded exhaust...always dirty so you recommend doing something like pulleys instead of a programmer?

I've heard about the SCT XCAL3 I'm just pretty much debating now if it'd worth the investment or if I should just spend the money on something else. I'm just curious to know how much of a noticeable there is with these programmers or if its just boloney.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2011
  #10  
Vonhanson's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 1
From: Glencoe, Minnesota
what do you all want out of the truck?

the 3.0 isn't very impressive thats what i used to have.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2011
  #11  
djfllmn's Avatar
Former Ford Parts Monkey
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 56
From: PA
^^^hence the 5.0 swap
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2011
  #12  
always dirty's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: stockton ca
Yep, thats my $0.02. I think the tuner is most beneficial to automatics. On top of the engine tune, Im pretty sure they actually firm the shifts somewhat, don't quote me on that though. Search the forum, but I think best bang for the buck is supposedly roller rockers. When it comes time for head gaskets, thats next if I can find em... Not sure if Fred sells anymore or not.
 

Last edited by always dirty; Sep 4, 2011 at 03:28 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2011
  #13  
RLong31's Avatar
The Ban Hammer
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 2
From: Monrovia, IN
I didn't notice much of a difference after I did the underdrive pulleys. Mpgs wise... maybe 1 mpg, if that... and more a seat of the pants feel than anything.

My next mod would be a tuner to firm up the shifts and get a towing and economy tune. I have a 4.0 tho...
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2011
  #14  
driveranger123's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Valdese,Nc
yeah wish i had more power in mine too its stock and dang the mpg does guzzle u would think it would be different but not at all a friend who works for napa has the 4.0 says it gets pretty good gas mileage thats strange !
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joshtank
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
12
Nov 3, 2009 11:02 PM
BBBB51
General Ford Ranger Discussion
1
Nov 27, 2007 01:18 PM
Rddvl23
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
4
Aug 3, 2005 11:18 AM
02FordFX4
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
6
Jun 26, 2005 09:54 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 AM.