2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Exhaust size

Old Jul 12, 2007
  #1  
04blackedge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Exhaust size

Hey guys im getting a SI-DO Flowmaster 40, what size what i get, im going to get 2.5" in but what size should i get out? I read 2" is fine to keep torque but what about 2.25"? What do you guys have/like?
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #2  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
Since you have a 3.0, I would say 2" duals for sure...lol.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #3  
04BlackFX4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
From: Maine
2''? nah go with 2.25'' thats what a lot of people run here... when i had my ranger i had 2.25'' and it sounded good. no bigger than 2.5'' thats when you lose backpressure and power is decreased..
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #4  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
You will loose back pressure the larger you go....

The gibson exhaust kit for rangers is 2.5" in and dual 1.75" out. People who have it like it and notice a power and torque increase, so why is 2" duals too small?
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #5  
04BlackFX4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
From: Maine
i didn't say it was too small, i figure since the stock piping on rangers is 2'' INlet, you need to go a little bit bigger for the outlets. well at least on my old ranger the inlet pipe was 2 inch.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #6  
Mike9825's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 489
Likes: 1
From: Willard OH
I'd say 2.5" in and 2.25" out duals just for the same reasons everyone else posted. -Mike-
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #7  
DaGGer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: East Windsor, CT
I agree, are engines dont' really produce much low end power so if you go with 2.25" dual outs it will help the top end I'm guessing.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #8  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
This is on the Gm trucks site I belong to, now look at the pipe sizes and the engine size, this is on a 350 Chevy. So for me it makes sense to use 2" duals since you only have a 3.0 V6 and not a 5.7 liter V8.



I'm not the exhaust expert by any means, but from my research I have found that those that use a single in/dual out muffler can usually maintain their low end if they use slightly smaller pipes running out the back. Then cap it off with a bigger echo chamber for the sound/look.

For instance, on my 5.7 I am using a Flow 40 series single 3" in and dual 2.25" out and it kept my low end in place while giving me the high end and mpg gains I desire. Another forum member, noted he used the same exhaust system and was able to maintain his low end as well while getting the duals out back and the sound he desired.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #9  
04BlackFX4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
From: Maine
with my 5.2L i have 3'' inlet 2.5'' outlet and its perfect. how long it usually take for a flowmaster to break in fully? (on a v8)
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #10  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
Usually a few months on any motor. (I do believe)
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #11  
04BlackFX4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
From: Maine
alrighty then. i just got it put on maybe 2 weeks ago.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #12  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
Originally Posted by Ranger Kid17
with my 5.2L i have 3'' inlet 2.5'' outlet and its perfect. how long it usually take for a flowmaster to break in fully? (on a v8)
Dual 2.5"? in any event, on a V8 that may be ok. Remember, he is a 3.0. That isn't a very big motor....
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007
  #13  
04BlackFX4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 1
From: Maine
oh yea 2.5'' is too big for the 3.0, maybe even the 4.0. 2.5'' outlet on a v8 isnt bad at all.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #14  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
Ideally, if you go 2.5" in, to equal a 2.5" out (single), you would need dual 1.75" pipes, so 2" is plenty. If I read correctly, even D. has dual 2" out, and his motor is built.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #15  
04blackedge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
I can't find any flowmasters that are 2.5" in 2" out. All the ones i see are 3"/2.5" or the rare 2.5"/2.25". Do they make 2.5"/2"?
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #16  
DCRVP's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Riverview, Fl
Mines 3" in 2.5" out
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #17  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
a 2.5in and a 2.25 out will be fine. IMO even on a 3.0.

the flowmaster is restrictive enough that you can go a little bigger on the outlet pipes.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #18  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
I can't find any flowmasters that are 2.5" in 2" out. All the ones i see are 3"/2.5" or the rare 2.5"/2.25". Do they make 2.5"/2"?
Yes they do, they have it on there web site. Hold on, I'll get the link....

Here ya go....

http://www.flowmastermufflers.com/pr...oducts_id=3399
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #19  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by greygooseranger
Ideally, if you go 2.5" in, to equal a 2.5" out (single), you would need dual 1.75" pipes, so 2" is plenty. If I read correctly, even D. has dual 2" out, and his motor is built.

D is running a free flow open muffler, like the borla or magnaflow design.

If you run the restrictive flowmaster with baffles and such then you can run a little bigger pipes.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #20  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
Originally Posted by zabeard
a 2.5in and a 2.25 out will be fine. IMO even on a 3.0.

the flowmaster is restrictive enough that you can go a little bigger on the outlet pipes.
Well if you do the formula, to keep the flow up on a 2.5" inlet pipe, the duals would need to be 1.75. So even if the flowmaster is more restrictive, 2" duals are big enough. IMO
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #21  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by greygooseranger
Well if you do the formula, to keep the flow up on a 2.5" inlet pipe, the duals would need to be 1.75. So even if the flowmaster is more restrictive, 2" duals are big enough. IMO

2.25 is pushing it but it will work fine with not much loss in backpressure.

I know some people are running 2.5in and dual 2.5 out. that is big imo

but hey I am just running 2.25 SI and 2.25 SO. and loving it.

I have been down the road of dual exhausts. you dont get performance from duals.

Performance is the best and most efficient flow from your engine.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #22  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
2.5" is too big I agree... 2.25 might be ok on a 4.0 but I still think that dual 2's is plenty on a 3.0. I am in the same boat as you, 2.25 all the way, but I have a 2.5 flowmaster coming (single in/out) so I will see if there is any loss or gain here soon....
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #23  
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Arizona
On my 4.0 I have 2.5" Header back exhaust with a borla turbo muffler with straight through SI/SO..... I would have gone 2.25 had I gone dual. I think 2" would be better for a 3.0 personally. Well D has 2" and Nickster has 2.5" true dual. I eventually plan on doing 2.5" true dual when I go SC
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2007
  #24  
BB2's Avatar
BB2
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: PA
I run a flowmaster 40 si do 2.5 all the way out infront of the right rear tire. I did notice a very small decrease in power, but the sound is pretty deep for a 3.0. The larger pipe woln't hurt my engine will it?
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2007
  #25  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
^^^^ No it wont hurt it, but like you said, you loose low end power, and to me, thats VERY important.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 PM.