2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

flowmaster 40

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2008
  #1  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
flowmaster 40

Im pretty sure im going to be getting a flowmaster 40 series muffler si/do. Im wondering what sounds better on a 3.0, an original 40, super 40, or delta flow? Also, for all you guys that have this exhaust, did you buy it as a kit, or buy the parts separately?
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008
  #2  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
On these trucks......they all pretty much sound the same. It's when you add two cylinders and a carburater is when they start changing sounds. MOST folks run a Delta Flow 40, as that's whats usually avaliable....I've ran a super40 and currently running an original 40....and the original 40 is slightly louder than the super 40. The delta flows, are quieter than the originals. One thing about the delta flow 40s, they have ALOT more avaliable in/out/size combos.....2.25 in, dual 2 out. that sorta thing. One duals you can get in the super 40 is the 3 in/2.5 out.

Hoped i helped a little.....i know you have a 3.0, but just tryin' to help.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008
  #3  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
Thanks, yea it helped a lot. What do you think would be a good size for piping. 2.5?
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008
  #4  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
Also, did you buy your exhaust as a kit, or buy the parts separately?
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008
  #5  
timpat92855's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 3
From: Lousiville, MS
i got the orginal 40 3in in and 2.5 out and its loud and i love it...you have to buy the muffler then get a muffler shop to run the pipe...i love my flow makes my 4 banger sound like a mustang
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008
  #6  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
Yea Im pretty sure im going to get the flowmaster original 40. I just have to decide on what size piping im going to run.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008
  #7  
DKM's Avatar
DKM
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: NH
I have an Original 40 dumped before the rear axle. SI/DO 3'' in 2.5'' out and it's loud as hell. I love it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008
  #8  
RazorsEDGE's Avatar
There's no lifeguard in the gene pool
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
I got the original 40 si/si dumped before the rear axle. I love the way it sounds. 2.5" in and out.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008
  #9  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
Yea its a hard decision. Im leaning towards 2.5 in, 2.5 out.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008
  #10  
Dangerranger01's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 2
From: Boring/Corvallis, Oregon
You really don't need 2.5 in/2.5 out......on my brother's truck, fx4wannabe, he's got 2.5 all th way, and he wishes he got 2.25 all the way. And he's a got a 4.0.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008
  #11  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Dangers exactly right, for the 3.0 you will be fine with 2.25 and 2 out, but I think its even better if you get it sized down to 1.75, then you can put whatever size tips on there and won't lose a lot of backpressure. I'm no expert tho so I could be wrong.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008
  #13  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
Ok so the 2.5 piping sounds worse than the 2.25? I guess i will downsize it then. Would 2.25 all around sound good?
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008
  #14  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Thing is.....for what power we put out in our trucks, combined with displacement.....you really don't need 2.5. Heck, my 450hp 406ci chevy uses dual 2.5s. As my brother said above, I wish i went with 2.25 on mine. Lost some power w/ 2.5. The muffler...that's really no biggie what the sizes are, the shop can enlarge or use those transitions things to change the size. Like the Super 40 is only avaliable in 3 in/2.5 dual out.

I wouldn't say 2.5 sounds worse, just performs worse...and you honestly don't need pipe that big.

4.0 calls for 2.5 in/dual 2 out.....i'd do 2.25 in/dual 1.75 or 2 out for a 3.0L.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008
  #15  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
So if I get 2' piping compared to the 2.25, will I lose any sound?
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008
  #16  
Hiemsnox's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Beavercreek, OH
has anyone tried the new Flowmaster 44 series?
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2008
  #17  
WowMike2001's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 4
From: Stevenson, WA
Originally Posted by Dangerranger01
You really don't need 2.5 in/2.5 out......on my brother's truck, fx4wannabe, he's got 2.5 all th way, and he wishes he got 2.25 all the way. And he's a got a 4.0.
Yeah, my current is a 2.25 dual out right now.. works perfect, nice and aggressive when you romp on it without it sounding muffled... nice bark to the engine =)

Soon as I get my JBA headers and my other stuff installed over the next 2 days.. I'll make a video.. comparing my stock truck with just the exhaust.. compared to me now with a CAI and headers
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008
  #18  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Originally Posted by Hiemsnox
has anyone tried the new Flowmaster 44 series?
A Flowmaster Super 44 is the same as a Super 40, but in a smaller case.....more compact. 4x8 vs 5x10 cases. I had a Super 40 and loved it. I'm trying out an original 40. Both mufflers were used in different exhaust setups...so that changes it as well. On my 406ci chevy, the super 40 is pretty mellow at idle and cruising...then when you romp on it, its MEAN! The Original 40 on the same truck, is loud and beefy at idle, and when you romp on it, it's mean, even more meaner than the super 40. Hope i helped.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2008
  #19  
Hiemsnox's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Beavercreek, OH
helped me understand a but more about the differant setups, but now i dont know if i want a original 40, super 40 or 44
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008
  #20  
WowMike2001's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 4
From: Stevenson, WA
Originally Posted by Hiemsnox
helped me understand a but more about the differant setups, but now i dont know if i want a original 40, super 40 or 44
Big, Bigger, and Biggest.. from Origional to Super to 44... what do you want? We cant really describe it unless you tell us what your looking for...
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008
  #21  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Ive ran so many different mufflers just for 2 reasons......1. "I wonder what this sounds like on my truck". And 2. IT's cheap to swap mufflers. Okay....maybe not "cheap" but it's relatively cheap to swap out. $65 here, 5 months later $50 for a new one, 6 months later.....

I've had stock, Dynomax Ultra Flow Oval, Magnaflow, Cherry Bomb Glasspack, Flowmaster Super 40, and currently Flowmaster Original 40.

Pretty much, any Flowmaster 40 series all pretty much sound the same. Original 40 doesn't have the delta flow technology, and from my experience and alot of other peoples experieces, the delta flow makes it a little quieter. But it's got better flow than the Original. And the Deltas are better in the interior resonance department.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2008
  #22  
Hiemsnox's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Beavercreek, OH
Originally Posted by WowMike2001
Big, Bigger, and Biggest.. from Origional to Super to 44... what do you want? We cant really describe it unless you tell us what your looking for...
I'm looking for something with a deep tone that sounds healthy but really i dont want something that dies away at higher RPM's
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008
  #23  
01 ranger 4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
From: Vacaville, CA
ive got the oricinal 40 series with 2.25 out duals sound mean at idle but the higher the rpms the more ricey it sounds especially for a 3.0
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008
  #24  
Trigger01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18,788
Likes: 4
From: Knoxville, TN
I like the sound of the super 40 personally, but it's to loud for me on my truck. I like my Borla.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008
  #25  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
How is the cab noise noise with the original 40?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:16 PM.