2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

long trip + 400 pound engine in bed= great MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2007
  #1  
LowMaz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Sterling/ Amherst, MA
long trip + 400 pound engine in bed= great MPG

On my trip to Virginia and back, I got amazingly good gas mileage.

I filled up five times and the calculated MPG of each tank was 20,21, 23, and 24

I was so shocked that driving a long distance even with a load in the bed gave me great gas mileage... I never thought Id be gettin around 20 mpg with my trcu so the 23 and 24 were shocking.

I guess have a CAI in my old airbox with the silencer removed help me here. The silencer removal was done last week and my i think its workin on gettin the cold air in there.

I also only ran 87 gas which I have never done. I usually run 89 all the time, or sometimes I do 88 at one of the stations in town.
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2007
  #2  
gearhead299's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Pennington, NJ
thats about the same as what i get, just gotta drive sane keep up with the maintenance and the 3.0 can do alright
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2007
  #3  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
My 4.0L loaded down with a bed full of fire wood............26mpg!
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2007
  #4  
pastfinder's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 1
From: Washington, DC
I like hauling large rocks for landscaping purposes, and hauling 300 pounds of stone gave me a 3-4 MPG increase....gotta love it :)
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2007
  #5  
TommyC's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 2
From: CA
Hrmm, this is interesting information, I like weight in my bed as it makes the ride better. Do you guys think you got better MPG because you were cruising at a slower speed with your loads?
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2007
  #6  
rolla_guy72's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, AK
Well, I have been getting around 18-19mpg here lately and I have over 160miles on 1/2 tank right now, and I usually get better mileage on the bottom end of the tank, so we'll see...

My guess is the weather.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2007
  #7  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
When i go up north I probably have 2-300 punds worth of crap in the bed (under a tonneau cover) plus the GF, the dog and a row boat (loaded and ready to roll 650 pounds) and I get 24 with my 4.oh......

Of course I have a 3.55 with 2WD, a 5 spd. and a few mods......
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2007
  #8  
franger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: litchfield,ct
lol geeze graygooseranger ya callin the g/f fat? lol j/k


mike
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2007
  #9  
Bhavesh's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 507
Likes: 2
From: City, State
^ lol
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2007
  #10  
b3kbruiser's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 713
Likes: 2
From: DFW Area, Tx
Maybe the weight in the rear helps grip better, requiring less torque to go? I dunno
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007
  #11  
Mazdaman99's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Perry, Florida
"I guess have a CAI in my old airbox with the silencer removed help me here. The silencer removal was done last week and my i think its workin on gettin the cold air in there."
how do you remove the silencer?? what does it do??
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007
  #12  
Danny818's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Santa Maria, CA
weird...but it does seem that you get better mileage when carrying a heavy lod.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007
  #13  
SouthernMudSlinger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: Demorest,Ga
Originally Posted by b3kbruiser
Maybe the weight in the rear helps grip better, requiring less torque to go? I dunno
If anything, it would require more torque.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007
  #14  
2003stealthedge's Avatar
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
From: The ILL State
i got better mpg towing my mustang when i brought it home from KY.
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007
  #15  
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 2
From: College Station, TX
Hmm this might be good to know. i've got 400 lbs of axles in the bed and I'll be towing a 2200 lb zuki. Hope I can get that good of mileage too!
 
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2007
  #16  
Bhavesh's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 507
Likes: 2
From: City, State
could it have to do with momentum?

ie. if you're rolling on highway and you coast more because you're maintaining speed, the injectors will shut off for a longer period of time
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007
  #17  
ks ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 273
Likes: 1
From: KS
Yeah, well my truck was getting.....14, 11, 13 mpg and last tank i got... 15.2!! wooo! not ha. Monday I'm gonna replace plugs,wires, fuelfilter, air filter, change oil, get the radiator flushed, change tranny fluid. Maybe that will help.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007
  #18  
catfish hunter's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Harrisonburg, VA
well, i drove a tanks worth of miles and got 2 mgp less when i was hauling a 600-lb small block. not sure how you explain your results.
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2007
  #19  
drarkansas's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL
My wife and I bought a load of harwood floors in Georgia a few years ago. I hauled it all back down to Florida in my previous truck, the 04 F150 FX4 with the 5.4 V8. I never had gotten even close to 20 for highway miles, but figured the mileage on that trip at 21.9. I thought about keeping it in the bed permanently!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jldevlin
Trip & Trail Reports
0
Jul 15, 2013 12:05 AM
dirtcrew51m
General Ford Ranger Discussion
2
May 24, 2010 08:24 PM
Marcaronio
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
23
May 11, 2007 08:11 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:41 PM.