2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Whipple vs 4.0SOHC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #1  
Muddy02Edge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Bonner Springs, Kansas
Whipple vs 4.0SOHC

I need more power outta my truck, for about the same amount of money i could find a wrecked 4.0 ranger and part it out from what i need and sell whatevers good and still be ahead of supercharger, as far as reliability is concerned. Anybody know of a good info site on the 4.0SOHC?
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #2  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Muddy02Edge
I need more power outta my truck, for about the same amount of money i could find a wrecked 4.0 ranger and part it out from what i need and sell whatevers good and still be ahead of supercharger, as far as reliability is concerned. Anybody know of a good info site on the 4.0SOHC?
You will need to find a donor with a good transmission, too. The 3.0 transmission case won't bolt to a 4.0L and both 4.0L transmissions are rated for higher torque.

Also, you will need to swap the PCM, engine/trans wiring harness and Y-pipe. In all likelihood, your 02 Edge already has an 8.8 axle that you will need to handle the output of the 4.0L.

The most logical donor would be a 2002 but a 2001~2003 should be very compatible. 2003's have no EGR which is a reliablility plus, IMO. Supposedly, the 2003-up have the tensioner problem completely fixed ... The 2004+ have wiring and intake differences but could be adapted if necessary.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #3  
Wowak's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 2
From: Merritt Island, FL
I've been weighing this same choice myself. The 4.0 gets terrible fuel milage, but the whipple dictates high-octane fuel. The dark-horse 3rd candidate is a 5.0 swap. That would afford me more power than a 4.0, with fuel economy comparable to a mildly modded 3.0, but the initial expense and difficulty would be greater on an order of magnitude.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #4  
NHBubba_Revisited's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere, XYZ
How much worse is the 4.0's mileage than the (stock) 3.0's? I thought the EPA spec was something like 1-2 MPG at best..
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #5  
Roach2004's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 3
From: Houston, TX
Get a car! I bet the whipple would sound tight though!
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #6  
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 2
From: College Station, TX
Power output would be about the same for each one. Personally, I say sell your truck and buy a 4.0 ranger and save yourself the headache.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #7  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Wowak
I've been weighing this same choice myself. The 4.0 gets terrible fuel milage, but the whipple dictates high-octane fuel. The dark-horse 3rd candidate is a 5.0 swap. That would afford me more power than a 4.0, with fuel economy comparable to a mildly modded 3.0, but the initial expense and difficulty would be greater on an order of magnitude.
I think the key to a 5.0 swap with acceptable FE is the axle ratio. We had a '96 2WD F150 S/C 5.0L manual w/3.08 axle and ~29" tires. It would get 20+ MPG @ 70 per, better than my 4.0L Ranger ever has. The F150 was no drag racer but it had enough go to leave most traffic behind.

It weighed about the same as my porker Level II. I don't know if it would be a good idea to go all the way to 3.08 but 3.31 should be about right on a Ranger with 31" tires.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #8  
NHBubba_Revisited's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere, XYZ
What kind of mileage do you see these days Bob? I suppose you should qualify that w/ how you drive it..

I've been baybing it lately (early shifts, no more than 2k except on the Interstate, and never more than 70 MPH). I'm seeing mileage as high as 18-20 MPG. .. Which I find a pleasant surprise..
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #9  
Mudhippy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 1
From: Santa Barbara, CA
ride a bike
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #10  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by NHBubba
What kind of mileage do you see these days Bob? I suppose you should qualify that w/ how you drive it..

I've been baybing it lately (early shifts, no more than 2k except on the Interstate, and never more than 70 MPH). I'm seeing mileage as high as 18-20 MPG. .. Which I find a pleasant surprise..
The best I can do on a highway trip is about 19 MPG at 70 MPH. I don't pay much attention to around town but it is definitely a lot lower than that.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #11  
NHBubba_Revisited's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere, XYZ
Sounds like we're on the same page.. Driving 'normally' I see 16-17 MPG combined.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #12  
Scallion02EDGE's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
i got 21mpg highway with my 4.0 before the programmer...and 22mpg now with the chip. I usually cruise between 70 and 85mph depending on traffic. I think i get good mileage highway cause my gears are 3.55
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005
  #13  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Scallion02EDGE
i got 21mpg highway with my 4.0 before the programmer...and 22mpg now with the chip. I usually cruise between 70 and 85mph depending on traffic. I think i get good mileage highway cause my gears are 3.55
Compared to mine, you have taller axle gearing, lighter weight, lower 2WD powertrain friction, narrower tires, a programmer and a more fuel economy friendly overdrive ratio (0.75 vs 0.79 on the manual). It all adds up.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2005
  #14  
Muddy02Edge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Bonner Springs, Kansas
Well selling it is out of the question, I love my truck, plus i couldn't get the tremor system with a 4.0. Also a 4.0 would be better bet for me over supercharger, I was just curious of any write ups on the swap, found alot for the ohv engine, and a few for the ohv to sohc but none 3.0 to sohc.

thanks for the tips bob, rwenzing
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005
  #16  
Muddy02Edge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Bonner Springs, Kansas
D, could you give me any tips that helped you? I wont be doing to swap , anytime soon, next summer at the earliest and thats if everything goes ok im between more power or lift to do first. I live in kansas so there arent really any emissions at all
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005
  #17  
ToughFord's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
the only think i know of is www.suppersixmotorsports.com as of right now all thats availible thru them is ported and polished and a valve job heads... they say soon to come a matching cam
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95offroadx
Drivetrain Tech
12
Feb 9, 2009 01:51 PM
duffman84
Drivetrain Tech
0
Feb 26, 2008 06:31 AM
Urandaman
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
20
Oct 10, 2007 11:05 PM
95offroadx
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
17
Sep 21, 2007 04:05 PM
l2en
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
41
Mar 11, 2007 09:10 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 PM.